Cargando…
ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis
CONTEXT: Morbidity and mortality amongst extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) in developing nations has not been well studied. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate survival until discharge, short- and long-term morbidities of ELBW and ELGANs in LMICs. DATA SOURCES: C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8342042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255352 |
_version_ | 1783734001725341696 |
---|---|
author | Ramaswamy, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Abiramalatha, Thangaraj Bandyopadhyay, Tapas Shaik, Nasreen Banu Bandiya, Prathik Nanda, Debasish Pullattayil S., Abdul Kareem Murki, Srinivas Roehr, Charles Christoph |
author_facet | Ramaswamy, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Abiramalatha, Thangaraj Bandyopadhyay, Tapas Shaik, Nasreen Banu Bandiya, Prathik Nanda, Debasish Pullattayil S., Abdul Kareem Murki, Srinivas Roehr, Charles Christoph |
author_sort | Ramaswamy, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Morbidity and mortality amongst extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) in developing nations has not been well studied. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate survival until discharge, short- and long-term morbidities of ELBW and ELGANs in LMICs. DATA SOURCES: CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective and retrospective observational studies were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Four authors extracted data independently. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to synthesize data, modified QUIPS scale to evaluate quality of studies and GRADE approach to ascertain the certainty of evidence (CoE). RESULTS: 192 studies enrolling 22,278 ELBW and 18,338 ELGANs were included. Survival was 34% (95% CI: 31% - 37%) (CoE–low) for ELBW and 39% (34% - 44%) (CoE—moderate) for ELGANs. For ELBW neonates, the survival for low-income (LI), lower middle-income (LMI) and upper middle income (UMI) countries was 18% (11% - 28%), 28% (21% - 35%) and 39% (36% - 42%), respectively. For ELGANs, it was 13% (8% - 20%) for LI, 28% (21% - 36%) for LMI and 48% (42% - 53%) for UMI countries. There was no difference in survival between two epochs: 2000–2009 and 2010–2020. Except for necrotising enterocolitis [ELBW and ELGANs—8% (7% - 10%)] and periventricular leukomalacia [ELBW—7% (4% - 11%); ELGANs—6% (5%-7%)], rates of all other morbidities were higher compared to developed nations. Rates of neurodevelopmental impairment was 17% (7% - 34%) in ELBW neonates and 29% (23% - 37%) in ELGANs. LIMITATIONS: CoE was very low to low for all secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality and morbidity amongst ELBW and ELGANs is still a significant burden in LMICs. CoE was very low to low for all the secondary outcomes, emphasizing the need for high quality prospective cohort studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020222873). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8342042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83420422021-08-06 ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis Ramaswamy, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Abiramalatha, Thangaraj Bandyopadhyay, Tapas Shaik, Nasreen Banu Bandiya, Prathik Nanda, Debasish Pullattayil S., Abdul Kareem Murki, Srinivas Roehr, Charles Christoph PLoS One Research Article CONTEXT: Morbidity and mortality amongst extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) in developing nations has not been well studied. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate survival until discharge, short- and long-term morbidities of ELBW and ELGANs in LMICs. DATA SOURCES: CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective and retrospective observational studies were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Four authors extracted data independently. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to synthesize data, modified QUIPS scale to evaluate quality of studies and GRADE approach to ascertain the certainty of evidence (CoE). RESULTS: 192 studies enrolling 22,278 ELBW and 18,338 ELGANs were included. Survival was 34% (95% CI: 31% - 37%) (CoE–low) for ELBW and 39% (34% - 44%) (CoE—moderate) for ELGANs. For ELBW neonates, the survival for low-income (LI), lower middle-income (LMI) and upper middle income (UMI) countries was 18% (11% - 28%), 28% (21% - 35%) and 39% (36% - 42%), respectively. For ELGANs, it was 13% (8% - 20%) for LI, 28% (21% - 36%) for LMI and 48% (42% - 53%) for UMI countries. There was no difference in survival between two epochs: 2000–2009 and 2010–2020. Except for necrotising enterocolitis [ELBW and ELGANs—8% (7% - 10%)] and periventricular leukomalacia [ELBW—7% (4% - 11%); ELGANs—6% (5%-7%)], rates of all other morbidities were higher compared to developed nations. Rates of neurodevelopmental impairment was 17% (7% - 34%) in ELBW neonates and 29% (23% - 37%) in ELGANs. LIMITATIONS: CoE was very low to low for all secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality and morbidity amongst ELBW and ELGANs is still a significant burden in LMICs. CoE was very low to low for all the secondary outcomes, emphasizing the need for high quality prospective cohort studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020222873). Public Library of Science 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8342042/ /pubmed/34352883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255352 Text en © 2021 Ramaswamy et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ramaswamy, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Abiramalatha, Thangaraj Bandyopadhyay, Tapas Shaik, Nasreen Banu Bandiya, Prathik Nanda, Debasish Pullattayil S., Abdul Kareem Murki, Srinivas Roehr, Charles Christoph ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | elbw and elgan outcomes in developing nations–systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8342042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramaswamyviraraghavanvadakkencherry elbwandelganoutcomesindevelopingnationssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT abiramalathathangaraj elbwandelganoutcomesindevelopingnationssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bandyopadhyaytapas elbwandelganoutcomesindevelopingnationssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shaiknasreenbanu elbwandelganoutcomesindevelopingnationssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bandiyaprathik elbwandelganoutcomesindevelopingnationssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nandadebasish elbwandelganoutcomesindevelopingnationssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pullattayilsabdulkareem elbwandelganoutcomesindevelopingnationssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT murkisrinivas elbwandelganoutcomesindevelopingnationssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT roehrcharleschristoph elbwandelganoutcomesindevelopingnationssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |