Cargando…
Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: To date, there are no consensus guidelines for management of lymphatic leak in groin vascular reconstruction patients. The goal of this study is to review the relevant literature to determine alternatives for treatment and to design an evidence-based algorithm to minimize cost and morbid...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8342245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352953 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.02075 |
_version_ | 1783734029507362816 |
---|---|
author | Nicksic, Peter John Condit, Kevin Michael Nayar, Harry Siva Michelotti, Brett Foster |
author_facet | Nicksic, Peter John Condit, Kevin Michael Nayar, Harry Siva Michelotti, Brett Foster |
author_sort | Nicksic, Peter John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To date, there are no consensus guidelines for management of lymphatic leak in groin vascular reconstruction patients. The goal of this study is to review the relevant literature to determine alternatives for treatment and to design an evidence-based algorithm to minimize cost and morbidity and maximize efficacy. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Two independent reviewers applied agreed-upon inclusion and exclusion criteria to eligible records. Studies that included patients who underwent groin dissection for oncologic diagnoses and level 5 data were excluded. Interventions were then categorized by efficacy using predetermined criteria. RESULTS: Our search yielded 333 records, of which eight studies were included. In four studies, the success of lymphatic ligation ranged from 75% to 100%, with average days to resolution ranging from 0 to 9. Conservative management in the form of elevation, compression, and bedrest may prolong time to resolution of lymphatic leak (14–24 days) and therefore cost. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients should be offered early operative intervention in the form of lymphatic ligation with or without a primary muscle flap. If the patient is not an operative candidate, a trial of conservative management should be attempted before other nonsurgical interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8342245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83422452021-08-12 Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review Nicksic, Peter John Condit, Kevin Michael Nayar, Harry Siva Michelotti, Brett Foster Arch Plast Surg Extremity/Lymphedema BACKGROUND: To date, there are no consensus guidelines for management of lymphatic leak in groin vascular reconstruction patients. The goal of this study is to review the relevant literature to determine alternatives for treatment and to design an evidence-based algorithm to minimize cost and morbidity and maximize efficacy. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Two independent reviewers applied agreed-upon inclusion and exclusion criteria to eligible records. Studies that included patients who underwent groin dissection for oncologic diagnoses and level 5 data were excluded. Interventions were then categorized by efficacy using predetermined criteria. RESULTS: Our search yielded 333 records, of which eight studies were included. In four studies, the success of lymphatic ligation ranged from 75% to 100%, with average days to resolution ranging from 0 to 9. Conservative management in the form of elevation, compression, and bedrest may prolong time to resolution of lymphatic leak (14–24 days) and therefore cost. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients should be offered early operative intervention in the form of lymphatic ligation with or without a primary muscle flap. If the patient is not an operative candidate, a trial of conservative management should be attempted before other nonsurgical interventions. Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2021-07 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8342245/ /pubmed/34352953 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.02075 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Extremity/Lymphedema Nicksic, Peter John Condit, Kevin Michael Nayar, Harry Siva Michelotti, Brett Foster Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review |
title | Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review |
title_full | Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review |
title_short | Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review |
title_sort | algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review |
topic | Extremity/Lymphedema |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8342245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352953 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.02075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nicksicpeterjohn algorithmicapproachtothelymphaticleakaftervascularreconstructionasystematicreview AT conditkevinmichael algorithmicapproachtothelymphaticleakaftervascularreconstructionasystematicreview AT nayarharrysiva algorithmicapproachtothelymphaticleakaftervascularreconstructionasystematicreview AT michelottibrettfoster algorithmicapproachtothelymphaticleakaftervascularreconstructionasystematicreview |