Cargando…
Efficacy of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in the Subgroup of Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from the NALA Trial
BACKGROUND: Neratinib has efficacy in central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We report outcomes among patients with CNS metastases at baseline from the phase III NALA trial of neratinib plus capecitabine (N + C) versus lapatinib plus capecitabine (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8342591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/onco.13830 |
_version_ | 1783734102937042944 |
---|---|
author | Hurvitz, Sara A. Saura, Cristina Oliveira, Mafalda Trudeau, Maureen E. Moy, Beverly Delaloge, Suzette Gradishar, William Kim, Sung‐Bae Haley, Barbara Ryvo, Larisa Dai, Ming‐Shen Milovanov, Vladimir Alarcón, Jesús Kalmadi, Sujith Cronemberger, Eduardo Souza, Cristiano Landeiro, Luciana Bose, Ron Bebchuk, Judith Kabbinavar, Fairooz Bryce, Richard Keyvanjah, Kiana Brufsky, Adam M. |
author_facet | Hurvitz, Sara A. Saura, Cristina Oliveira, Mafalda Trudeau, Maureen E. Moy, Beverly Delaloge, Suzette Gradishar, William Kim, Sung‐Bae Haley, Barbara Ryvo, Larisa Dai, Ming‐Shen Milovanov, Vladimir Alarcón, Jesús Kalmadi, Sujith Cronemberger, Eduardo Souza, Cristiano Landeiro, Luciana Bose, Ron Bebchuk, Judith Kabbinavar, Fairooz Bryce, Richard Keyvanjah, Kiana Brufsky, Adam M. |
author_sort | Hurvitz, Sara A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neratinib has efficacy in central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We report outcomes among patients with CNS metastases at baseline from the phase III NALA trial of neratinib plus capecitabine (N + C) versus lapatinib plus capecitabine (L + C). MATERIALS AND METHODS: NALA was a randomized, active‐controlled trial in patients who received two or more previous HER2‐directed regimens for HER2‐positive MBC. Patients with asymptomatic/stable brain metastases (treated or untreated) were eligible. Patients were assigned to N + C (neratinib 240 mg per day, capecitabine 750 mg/m(2) twice daily) or L + C (lapatinib 1,250 mg per day, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily) orally. Independently adjudicated progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and CNS endpoints were considered. RESULTS: Of 621 patients enrolled, 101 (16.3%) had known CNS metastases at baseline (N + C, n = 51; L + C, n = 50); 81 had received prior CNS‐directed radiotherapy and/or surgery. In the CNS subgroup, mean PFS through 24 months was 7.8 months with N + C versus 5.5 months with L + C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–1.05), and mean OS through 48 months was 16.4 versus 15.4 months (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.59–1.38). At 12 months, cumulative incidence of interventions for CNS disease was 25.5% for N + C versus 36.0% for L + C, and cumulative incidence of progressive CNS disease was 26.2% versus 41.6%, respectively. In patients with target CNS lesions at baseline (n = 32), confirmed intracranial objective response rates were 26.3% and 15.4%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: These analyses suggest improved PFS and CNS outcomes with N + C versus L + C in patients with CNS metastases from HER2‐positive MBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In a subgroup of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2‐positive breast cancer after two or more previous HER2‐directed regimens, the combination of neratinib plus capecitabine was associated with improved progression‐free survival and CNS outcomes compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine. These findings build on previous phase II and III studies describing efficacy of neratinib in the prevention and treatment of CNS metastases, and support a role for neratinib as a systemic treatment option in the management of patients with HER2‐positive brain metastases following antibody‐based HER2‐directed therapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8342591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83425912021-08-11 Efficacy of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in the Subgroup of Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from the NALA Trial Hurvitz, Sara A. Saura, Cristina Oliveira, Mafalda Trudeau, Maureen E. Moy, Beverly Delaloge, Suzette Gradishar, William Kim, Sung‐Bae Haley, Barbara Ryvo, Larisa Dai, Ming‐Shen Milovanov, Vladimir Alarcón, Jesús Kalmadi, Sujith Cronemberger, Eduardo Souza, Cristiano Landeiro, Luciana Bose, Ron Bebchuk, Judith Kabbinavar, Fairooz Bryce, Richard Keyvanjah, Kiana Brufsky, Adam M. Oncologist Breast Cancer BACKGROUND: Neratinib has efficacy in central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We report outcomes among patients with CNS metastases at baseline from the phase III NALA trial of neratinib plus capecitabine (N + C) versus lapatinib plus capecitabine (L + C). MATERIALS AND METHODS: NALA was a randomized, active‐controlled trial in patients who received two or more previous HER2‐directed regimens for HER2‐positive MBC. Patients with asymptomatic/stable brain metastases (treated or untreated) were eligible. Patients were assigned to N + C (neratinib 240 mg per day, capecitabine 750 mg/m(2) twice daily) or L + C (lapatinib 1,250 mg per day, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily) orally. Independently adjudicated progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and CNS endpoints were considered. RESULTS: Of 621 patients enrolled, 101 (16.3%) had known CNS metastases at baseline (N + C, n = 51; L + C, n = 50); 81 had received prior CNS‐directed radiotherapy and/or surgery. In the CNS subgroup, mean PFS through 24 months was 7.8 months with N + C versus 5.5 months with L + C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–1.05), and mean OS through 48 months was 16.4 versus 15.4 months (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.59–1.38). At 12 months, cumulative incidence of interventions for CNS disease was 25.5% for N + C versus 36.0% for L + C, and cumulative incidence of progressive CNS disease was 26.2% versus 41.6%, respectively. In patients with target CNS lesions at baseline (n = 32), confirmed intracranial objective response rates were 26.3% and 15.4%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: These analyses suggest improved PFS and CNS outcomes with N + C versus L + C in patients with CNS metastases from HER2‐positive MBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In a subgroup of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2‐positive breast cancer after two or more previous HER2‐directed regimens, the combination of neratinib plus capecitabine was associated with improved progression‐free survival and CNS outcomes compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine. These findings build on previous phase II and III studies describing efficacy of neratinib in the prevention and treatment of CNS metastases, and support a role for neratinib as a systemic treatment option in the management of patients with HER2‐positive brain metastases following antibody‐based HER2‐directed therapies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-06-07 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8342591/ /pubmed/34028126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/onco.13830 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Breast Cancer Hurvitz, Sara A. Saura, Cristina Oliveira, Mafalda Trudeau, Maureen E. Moy, Beverly Delaloge, Suzette Gradishar, William Kim, Sung‐Bae Haley, Barbara Ryvo, Larisa Dai, Ming‐Shen Milovanov, Vladimir Alarcón, Jesús Kalmadi, Sujith Cronemberger, Eduardo Souza, Cristiano Landeiro, Luciana Bose, Ron Bebchuk, Judith Kabbinavar, Fairooz Bryce, Richard Keyvanjah, Kiana Brufsky, Adam M. Efficacy of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in the Subgroup of Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from the NALA Trial |
title | Efficacy of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in the Subgroup of Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from the NALA Trial |
title_full | Efficacy of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in the Subgroup of Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from the NALA Trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in the Subgroup of Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from the NALA Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in the Subgroup of Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from the NALA Trial |
title_short | Efficacy of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in the Subgroup of Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from the NALA Trial |
title_sort | efficacy of neratinib plus capecitabine in the subgroup of patients with central nervous system involvement from the nala trial |
topic | Breast Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8342591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/onco.13830 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hurvitzsaraa efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT sauracristina efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT oliveiramafalda efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT trudeaumaureene efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT moybeverly efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT delalogesuzette efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT gradisharwilliam efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT kimsungbae efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT haleybarbara efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT ryvolarisa efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT daimingshen efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT milovanovvladimir efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT alarconjesus efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT kalmadisujith efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT cronembergereduardo efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT souzacristiano efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT landeiroluciana efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT boseron efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT bebchukjudith efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT kabbinavarfairooz efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT brycerichard efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT keyvanjahkiana efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial AT brufskyadamm efficacyofneratinibpluscapecitabineinthesubgroupofpatientswithcentralnervoussysteminvolvementfromthenalatrial |