Cargando…

Essential Infantile Esotropia: A Course of Treatment From Our Experience

Background: Essential infantile esotropia (EIE) is the most common type of childhood esotropia. Although its classical approach is surgical, less invasive techniques have been proposed as an adjunct or alternative to traditional surgery. Among them, chemodenervation with botulinum toxin (BT) has bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pensiero, Stefano, Diplotti, Laura, Presotto, Marianna, Ronfani, Luca, Barbi, Egidio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8342806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34368027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.695841
_version_ 1783734138245742592
author Pensiero, Stefano
Diplotti, Laura
Presotto, Marianna
Ronfani, Luca
Barbi, Egidio
author_facet Pensiero, Stefano
Diplotti, Laura
Presotto, Marianna
Ronfani, Luca
Barbi, Egidio
author_sort Pensiero, Stefano
collection PubMed
description Background: Essential infantile esotropia (EIE) is the most common type of childhood esotropia. Although its classical approach is surgical, less invasive techniques have been proposed as an adjunct or alternative to traditional surgery. Among them, chemodenervation with botulinum toxin (BT) has been investigated, showing variable and sometimes conflicting results. Objectives: To compare the outcomes of bilateral BT injection and traditional surgery in a pediatric population with EIE in order to optimize and standardize the therapeutic approach. Other purposes are to evaluate whether early intervention may prevent the onset of vertical ocular deviation (which is part of the clinical picture of EIE) and/or influence the development of fine stereopsis, and also to assess changes in refractive status over time among the enrolled population. Methods: A retrospective consecutive cohort study was conducted in 86 children aged 0–48 months who underwent correction of EIE. The primary intervention in naïve subjects was either bilateral BT injection (36 subjects, “BT group”) or strabismus surgery (50 subjects, “surgery group”). Results: Overall, BT chemodenervation (one or two injections) was effective in 13 (36.1%) subjects. With regard to residual deviation angle, the outcomes at least 5 years after the last intervention were overlapping in children receiving initial treatment with either injection or surgery; however, the success rate of primary intervention in the surgery group was higher, and the average number of interventions necessary to achieve orthotropia was smaller. Both early treatment with chemodenervation and surgery at a later age were not found to prevent the onset of vertical ocular deviation, whereas, surprisingly, the percentage of subjects developing fine stereopsis was higher in the surgery group. Finally, with regard to the change in refractive status over time, most of the subjects increased their initial hyperopia, whereas 10% became myopic. Conclusions: Our data suggest that a single bilateral BT injection by age 2 years should be considered as the first-line treatment of EIE without vertical component; whereas, traditional surgery should be considered as the first-line treatment for all other cases and in subjects unresponsive to primary single BT injection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8342806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83428062021-08-07 Essential Infantile Esotropia: A Course of Treatment From Our Experience Pensiero, Stefano Diplotti, Laura Presotto, Marianna Ronfani, Luca Barbi, Egidio Front Pediatr Pediatrics Background: Essential infantile esotropia (EIE) is the most common type of childhood esotropia. Although its classical approach is surgical, less invasive techniques have been proposed as an adjunct or alternative to traditional surgery. Among them, chemodenervation with botulinum toxin (BT) has been investigated, showing variable and sometimes conflicting results. Objectives: To compare the outcomes of bilateral BT injection and traditional surgery in a pediatric population with EIE in order to optimize and standardize the therapeutic approach. Other purposes are to evaluate whether early intervention may prevent the onset of vertical ocular deviation (which is part of the clinical picture of EIE) and/or influence the development of fine stereopsis, and also to assess changes in refractive status over time among the enrolled population. Methods: A retrospective consecutive cohort study was conducted in 86 children aged 0–48 months who underwent correction of EIE. The primary intervention in naïve subjects was either bilateral BT injection (36 subjects, “BT group”) or strabismus surgery (50 subjects, “surgery group”). Results: Overall, BT chemodenervation (one or two injections) was effective in 13 (36.1%) subjects. With regard to residual deviation angle, the outcomes at least 5 years after the last intervention were overlapping in children receiving initial treatment with either injection or surgery; however, the success rate of primary intervention in the surgery group was higher, and the average number of interventions necessary to achieve orthotropia was smaller. Both early treatment with chemodenervation and surgery at a later age were not found to prevent the onset of vertical ocular deviation, whereas, surprisingly, the percentage of subjects developing fine stereopsis was higher in the surgery group. Finally, with regard to the change in refractive status over time, most of the subjects increased their initial hyperopia, whereas 10% became myopic. Conclusions: Our data suggest that a single bilateral BT injection by age 2 years should be considered as the first-line treatment of EIE without vertical component; whereas, traditional surgery should be considered as the first-line treatment for all other cases and in subjects unresponsive to primary single BT injection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8342806/ /pubmed/34368027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.695841 Text en Copyright © 2021 Pensiero, Diplotti, Presotto, Ronfani and Barbi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Pensiero, Stefano
Diplotti, Laura
Presotto, Marianna
Ronfani, Luca
Barbi, Egidio
Essential Infantile Esotropia: A Course of Treatment From Our Experience
title Essential Infantile Esotropia: A Course of Treatment From Our Experience
title_full Essential Infantile Esotropia: A Course of Treatment From Our Experience
title_fullStr Essential Infantile Esotropia: A Course of Treatment From Our Experience
title_full_unstemmed Essential Infantile Esotropia: A Course of Treatment From Our Experience
title_short Essential Infantile Esotropia: A Course of Treatment From Our Experience
title_sort essential infantile esotropia: a course of treatment from our experience
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8342806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34368027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.695841
work_keys_str_mv AT pensierostefano essentialinfantileesotropiaacourseoftreatmentfromourexperience
AT diplottilaura essentialinfantileesotropiaacourseoftreatmentfromourexperience
AT presottomarianna essentialinfantileesotropiaacourseoftreatmentfromourexperience
AT ronfaniluca essentialinfantileesotropiaacourseoftreatmentfromourexperience
AT barbiegidio essentialinfantileesotropiaacourseoftreatmentfromourexperience