Cargando…

South African Regulatory Authority: The Impact of Reliance on the Review Process Leading to Improved Patient Access

Background: The aims of this study were to compare the overall regulatory review timelines achieved by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) in 2020 to the timelines historically achieved by the Medicines Control Council (MCC). This study also aimed to evaluate the regulato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keyter, Andrea, Salek, Sam, Danks, Lorraine, Nkambule, Portia, Semete-Makokotlela, Boitumelo, Walker, Stuart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8342884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34366850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.699063
_version_ 1783734157343457280
author Keyter, Andrea
Salek, Sam
Danks, Lorraine
Nkambule, Portia
Semete-Makokotlela, Boitumelo
Walker, Stuart
author_facet Keyter, Andrea
Salek, Sam
Danks, Lorraine
Nkambule, Portia
Semete-Makokotlela, Boitumelo
Walker, Stuart
author_sort Keyter, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Background: The aims of this study were to compare the overall regulatory review timelines achieved by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) in 2020 to the timelines historically achieved by the Medicines Control Council (MCC). This study also aimed to evaluate the regulatory review processes and the good review practices that have been implemented by SAHPRA to support the assessment of new chemical entities and generic product applications for market authorization in the business-as-usual and backlog process streams. Methods: A questionnaire was completed and verified by SAHPRA to describe the structure of the organization, the resources available, the process for regulatory review of new chemical entities and generic products and the level of implementation of good review practices and regulatory decision-making practices for market authorization. Data were collected and analyzed on the overall approval timelines for new chemical entities and generic products registered by SAHPRA in 2020 in the business-as-usual and backlog process streams. Results: A full, independent scientific review was conducted for all new chemical entities and generic product applications in the business-as-usual stream. Facilitated regulatory pathways were introduced for the review of new chemical entities and generic products in the backlog stream. As a result, the timelines for approval of applications in the backlog stream were 68% quicker for both new chemical entities and generics, using facilitated regulatory pathways, such as abridged and verification review models. Conclusion: The comparisons made through this study provided insight into the improvements that have been made through the establishment of SAHPRA and the transition in 2018 from the MCC. The re-engineered processes that have been developed and implemented by SAHPRA to address the backlog in the review of the applications for market authorization have demonstrated a decrease in the overall median approval times. The expansion of these processes into the routine review of medical products will contribute to the enhanced regulatory performance of SAHPRA and patients’ access to new medicines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8342884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83428842021-08-07 South African Regulatory Authority: The Impact of Reliance on the Review Process Leading to Improved Patient Access Keyter, Andrea Salek, Sam Danks, Lorraine Nkambule, Portia Semete-Makokotlela, Boitumelo Walker, Stuart Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: The aims of this study were to compare the overall regulatory review timelines achieved by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) in 2020 to the timelines historically achieved by the Medicines Control Council (MCC). This study also aimed to evaluate the regulatory review processes and the good review practices that have been implemented by SAHPRA to support the assessment of new chemical entities and generic product applications for market authorization in the business-as-usual and backlog process streams. Methods: A questionnaire was completed and verified by SAHPRA to describe the structure of the organization, the resources available, the process for regulatory review of new chemical entities and generic products and the level of implementation of good review practices and regulatory decision-making practices for market authorization. Data were collected and analyzed on the overall approval timelines for new chemical entities and generic products registered by SAHPRA in 2020 in the business-as-usual and backlog process streams. Results: A full, independent scientific review was conducted for all new chemical entities and generic product applications in the business-as-usual stream. Facilitated regulatory pathways were introduced for the review of new chemical entities and generic products in the backlog stream. As a result, the timelines for approval of applications in the backlog stream were 68% quicker for both new chemical entities and generics, using facilitated regulatory pathways, such as abridged and verification review models. Conclusion: The comparisons made through this study provided insight into the improvements that have been made through the establishment of SAHPRA and the transition in 2018 from the MCC. The re-engineered processes that have been developed and implemented by SAHPRA to address the backlog in the review of the applications for market authorization have demonstrated a decrease in the overall median approval times. The expansion of these processes into the routine review of medical products will contribute to the enhanced regulatory performance of SAHPRA and patients’ access to new medicines. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8342884/ /pubmed/34366850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.699063 Text en Copyright © 2021 Keyter, Salek, Danks, Nkambule, Semete-Makokotlela and Walker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Keyter, Andrea
Salek, Sam
Danks, Lorraine
Nkambule, Portia
Semete-Makokotlela, Boitumelo
Walker, Stuart
South African Regulatory Authority: The Impact of Reliance on the Review Process Leading to Improved Patient Access
title South African Regulatory Authority: The Impact of Reliance on the Review Process Leading to Improved Patient Access
title_full South African Regulatory Authority: The Impact of Reliance on the Review Process Leading to Improved Patient Access
title_fullStr South African Regulatory Authority: The Impact of Reliance on the Review Process Leading to Improved Patient Access
title_full_unstemmed South African Regulatory Authority: The Impact of Reliance on the Review Process Leading to Improved Patient Access
title_short South African Regulatory Authority: The Impact of Reliance on the Review Process Leading to Improved Patient Access
title_sort south african regulatory authority: the impact of reliance on the review process leading to improved patient access
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8342884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34366850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.699063
work_keys_str_mv AT keyterandrea southafricanregulatoryauthoritytheimpactofrelianceonthereviewprocessleadingtoimprovedpatientaccess
AT saleksam southafricanregulatoryauthoritytheimpactofrelianceonthereviewprocessleadingtoimprovedpatientaccess
AT dankslorraine southafricanregulatoryauthoritytheimpactofrelianceonthereviewprocessleadingtoimprovedpatientaccess
AT nkambuleportia southafricanregulatoryauthoritytheimpactofrelianceonthereviewprocessleadingtoimprovedpatientaccess
AT semetemakokotlelaboitumelo southafricanregulatoryauthoritytheimpactofrelianceonthereviewprocessleadingtoimprovedpatientaccess
AT walkerstuart southafricanregulatoryauthoritytheimpactofrelianceonthereviewprocessleadingtoimprovedpatientaccess