Cargando…

The efficacy of different bandaging methods in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: A prospective, randomized study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of 3MTM CobanTM 2 layer system and conventional multi-layer short-stretch bandaging in terms of volume reduction, ultrasonographic measurements, functional status, and quality of life (QoL) in the treatment of patients with b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaman, Ayşegül, Borman, Pınar, İnanlı, Adeviye, Kul, Fatma, Karahan, Sevilay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396066
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2021.6287
_version_ 1783734220201394176
author Yaman, Ayşegül
Borman, Pınar
İnanlı, Adeviye
Kul, Fatma
Karahan, Sevilay
author_facet Yaman, Ayşegül
Borman, Pınar
İnanlı, Adeviye
Kul, Fatma
Karahan, Sevilay
author_sort Yaman, Ayşegül
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of 3MTM CobanTM 2 layer system and conventional multi-layer short-stretch bandaging in terms of volume reduction, ultrasonographic measurements, functional status, and quality of life (QoL) in the treatment of patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, single-blind, randomized study included a total of 60 BCRL patients (60 females; mean age 54.9±9.6 years; range, 30 to 73 years). The patients were randomly allocated to Group 1 (n=30) and Group 2 (n=30). Both groups received complex decongestive therapy (CDT) including skin care, lymphedema exercises, and manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) combined with traditional multi-layer short-stretch bandaging five times per week for three weeks in Group 1 and with 3MTM CobanTM 2 layer system bandaging two times per week for three weeks in Group 2. Differences in volumes, excess volumes, ultrasonographic measurements, QoL, and functional assessment scores were evaluated at baseline, after three weeks of intensive treatment period, and at two months of follow-up. Functional status was evaluated by the Quick Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH), while the QoL was assessed using the Turkish version of Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm (LYMQOL-Arm). The duration and easiness of applying bandages by physiotherapists and comfortableness of bandages according to patients and physiotherapists were also evaluated using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The demographic and clinical properties were similar between the groups. There were significant improvements in the volumes, excess volumes, ultrasonographic measures, functional scores, and QoL scores in both groups at the end of treatment. The improvements were sustained at two months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The 3MTM CobanTM 2 layer bandaging as a part of CDT twice a week for a period of three weeks can significantly reduce the volume and improve the disability and impaired QoL, similar to conventional short-stretch multi-layer bandages. In addition, treatment with this layer system enables a time-efficient, easy, and comfortable application of bandaging with increased mobility of the upper extremity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8343160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83431602021-08-13 The efficacy of different bandaging methods in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: A prospective, randomized study Yaman, Ayşegül Borman, Pınar İnanlı, Adeviye Kul, Fatma Karahan, Sevilay Turk J Phys Med Rehabil Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of 3MTM CobanTM 2 layer system and conventional multi-layer short-stretch bandaging in terms of volume reduction, ultrasonographic measurements, functional status, and quality of life (QoL) in the treatment of patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, single-blind, randomized study included a total of 60 BCRL patients (60 females; mean age 54.9±9.6 years; range, 30 to 73 years). The patients were randomly allocated to Group 1 (n=30) and Group 2 (n=30). Both groups received complex decongestive therapy (CDT) including skin care, lymphedema exercises, and manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) combined with traditional multi-layer short-stretch bandaging five times per week for three weeks in Group 1 and with 3MTM CobanTM 2 layer system bandaging two times per week for three weeks in Group 2. Differences in volumes, excess volumes, ultrasonographic measurements, QoL, and functional assessment scores were evaluated at baseline, after three weeks of intensive treatment period, and at two months of follow-up. Functional status was evaluated by the Quick Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH), while the QoL was assessed using the Turkish version of Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm (LYMQOL-Arm). The duration and easiness of applying bandages by physiotherapists and comfortableness of bandages according to patients and physiotherapists were also evaluated using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The demographic and clinical properties were similar between the groups. There were significant improvements in the volumes, excess volumes, ultrasonographic measures, functional scores, and QoL scores in both groups at the end of treatment. The improvements were sustained at two months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The 3MTM CobanTM 2 layer bandaging as a part of CDT twice a week for a period of three weeks can significantly reduce the volume and improve the disability and impaired QoL, similar to conventional short-stretch multi-layer bandages. In addition, treatment with this layer system enables a time-efficient, easy, and comfortable application of bandaging with increased mobility of the upper extremity. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8343160/ /pubmed/34396066 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2021.6287 Text en Copyright © 2021, Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yaman, Ayşegül
Borman, Pınar
İnanlı, Adeviye
Kul, Fatma
Karahan, Sevilay
The efficacy of different bandaging methods in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: A prospective, randomized study
title The efficacy of different bandaging methods in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: A prospective, randomized study
title_full The efficacy of different bandaging methods in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: A prospective, randomized study
title_fullStr The efficacy of different bandaging methods in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: A prospective, randomized study
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of different bandaging methods in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: A prospective, randomized study
title_short The efficacy of different bandaging methods in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: A prospective, randomized study
title_sort efficacy of different bandaging methods in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a prospective, randomized study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34396066
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2021.6287
work_keys_str_mv AT yamanaysegul theefficacyofdifferentbandagingmethodsinpatientswithbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT bormanpınar theefficacyofdifferentbandagingmethodsinpatientswithbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT inanlıadeviye theefficacyofdifferentbandagingmethodsinpatientswithbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT kulfatma theefficacyofdifferentbandagingmethodsinpatientswithbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT karahansevilay theefficacyofdifferentbandagingmethodsinpatientswithbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT yamanaysegul efficacyofdifferentbandagingmethodsinpatientswithbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT bormanpınar efficacyofdifferentbandagingmethodsinpatientswithbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT inanlıadeviye efficacyofdifferentbandagingmethodsinpatientswithbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT kulfatma efficacyofdifferentbandagingmethodsinpatientswithbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT karahansevilay efficacyofdifferentbandagingmethodsinpatientswithbreastcancerrelatedlymphedemaaprospectiverandomizedstudy