Cargando…

Rheumatology education in India: a survey-based cross sectional study

This study aimed at understanding the perception and perspectives of rheumatology trainees about specialist training in India. Rheumatology trainees (Doctorate of Medicine, Diplomate of National Board) in Indian universities (2010 onwards) were contacted to complete a validated e-survey consisting o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Latika, Khan, Hiba, Sinha, Mehul, Misra, Durga P., Kharbanda, Rajat, Chatterjee, Tulika, Nune, Arvind, Agarwal, Vikas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34357454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04962-9
_version_ 1783734235272577024
author Gupta, Latika
Khan, Hiba
Sinha, Mehul
Misra, Durga P.
Kharbanda, Rajat
Chatterjee, Tulika
Nune, Arvind
Agarwal, Vikas
author_facet Gupta, Latika
Khan, Hiba
Sinha, Mehul
Misra, Durga P.
Kharbanda, Rajat
Chatterjee, Tulika
Nune, Arvind
Agarwal, Vikas
author_sort Gupta, Latika
collection PubMed
description This study aimed at understanding the perception and perspectives of rheumatology trainees about specialist training in India. Rheumatology trainees (Doctorate of Medicine, Diplomate of National Board) in Indian universities (2010 onwards) were contacted to complete a validated e-survey consisting of 41 questions to evaluate the current rheumatology training in India. Of 53 respondents (M:F 3.4:1, mean age 37 years ± 12.7), 81.1% trained at government hospitals, and 15.1% trained at private hospitals. During training period, 37.5% respondents were exposed to 6–7 h of didactics/week. They treated nearly 175 patients (175 ± 35.4) per week and reported a reasonable level of independence in management of patients with common rheumatic diseases (RDs) during their training (7.5 ± 0.7 SD). However, nearly one-third of the trainees were not exposed to basic immunology and laboratory techniques. Similarly, placement in the radiology department was not a part of the curriculum for nearly half of the trainees, 80% were not confident to manage paediatric RDs and soft tissue rheumatism. Almost 60% did not feel comfortable in addressing ancillary care including patient counselling as they had not received formal training. Among the participants, 59% were not satisfied by the current system of assessment, 86.8% suggested for multiple time point-based assessment systems and 45.3% preferred objective and subjective assessment in final examinations. Rheumatology training in India offers notable exposure to patients and independence in managing cases. However, there is an unmet need for improvement in training in the field of laboratory, radiology and ancillary care, and to overhaul assessment system by including objective evaluation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-021-04962-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8343210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83432102021-08-06 Rheumatology education in India: a survey-based cross sectional study Gupta, Latika Khan, Hiba Sinha, Mehul Misra, Durga P. Kharbanda, Rajat Chatterjee, Tulika Nune, Arvind Agarwal, Vikas Rheumatol Int Observational Research This study aimed at understanding the perception and perspectives of rheumatology trainees about specialist training in India. Rheumatology trainees (Doctorate of Medicine, Diplomate of National Board) in Indian universities (2010 onwards) were contacted to complete a validated e-survey consisting of 41 questions to evaluate the current rheumatology training in India. Of 53 respondents (M:F 3.4:1, mean age 37 years ± 12.7), 81.1% trained at government hospitals, and 15.1% trained at private hospitals. During training period, 37.5% respondents were exposed to 6–7 h of didactics/week. They treated nearly 175 patients (175 ± 35.4) per week and reported a reasonable level of independence in management of patients with common rheumatic diseases (RDs) during their training (7.5 ± 0.7 SD). However, nearly one-third of the trainees were not exposed to basic immunology and laboratory techniques. Similarly, placement in the radiology department was not a part of the curriculum for nearly half of the trainees, 80% were not confident to manage paediatric RDs and soft tissue rheumatism. Almost 60% did not feel comfortable in addressing ancillary care including patient counselling as they had not received formal training. Among the participants, 59% were not satisfied by the current system of assessment, 86.8% suggested for multiple time point-based assessment systems and 45.3% preferred objective and subjective assessment in final examinations. Rheumatology training in India offers notable exposure to patients and independence in managing cases. However, there is an unmet need for improvement in training in the field of laboratory, radiology and ancillary care, and to overhaul assessment system by including objective evaluation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-021-04962-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8343210/ /pubmed/34357454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04962-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Observational Research
Gupta, Latika
Khan, Hiba
Sinha, Mehul
Misra, Durga P.
Kharbanda, Rajat
Chatterjee, Tulika
Nune, Arvind
Agarwal, Vikas
Rheumatology education in India: a survey-based cross sectional study
title Rheumatology education in India: a survey-based cross sectional study
title_full Rheumatology education in India: a survey-based cross sectional study
title_fullStr Rheumatology education in India: a survey-based cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Rheumatology education in India: a survey-based cross sectional study
title_short Rheumatology education in India: a survey-based cross sectional study
title_sort rheumatology education in india: a survey-based cross sectional study
topic Observational Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34357454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04962-9
work_keys_str_mv AT guptalatika rheumatologyeducationinindiaasurveybasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT khanhiba rheumatologyeducationinindiaasurveybasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT sinhamehul rheumatologyeducationinindiaasurveybasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT misradurgap rheumatologyeducationinindiaasurveybasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT kharbandarajat rheumatologyeducationinindiaasurveybasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT chatterjeetulika rheumatologyeducationinindiaasurveybasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT nunearvind rheumatologyeducationinindiaasurveybasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT agarwalvikas rheumatologyeducationinindiaasurveybasedcrosssectionalstudy