Cargando…

Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature

PURPOSE: The purpose of this bibliometric study was to summarize European orthopedic literature produced by EFORT memberships between 2009 and 2019 and to identify the 100 most cited articles, analyzing the characteristics that made them so interesting for the orthopedic scientific world. METHOD: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mani, Olimpia, Nucci, Anna Maria, Scaglione, Michelangelo, Bonicoli, Enrico, Parchi, Paolo Domenico, Piolanti, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212934
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i3.9512
_version_ 1783734349958479872
author Mani, Olimpia
Nucci, Anna Maria
Scaglione, Michelangelo
Bonicoli, Enrico
Parchi, Paolo Domenico
Piolanti, Nicola
author_facet Mani, Olimpia
Nucci, Anna Maria
Scaglione, Michelangelo
Bonicoli, Enrico
Parchi, Paolo Domenico
Piolanti, Nicola
author_sort Mani, Olimpia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this bibliometric study was to summarize European orthopedic literature produced by EFORT memberships between 2009 and 2019 and to identify the 100 most cited articles, analyzing the characteristics that made them so interesting for the orthopedic scientific world. METHOD: A search of the literature was conducted using Clarivate Analytics Web of Science in the subject category “orthopaedics”; then the results were summarized using Web of Science tools. RESULTS: A total of 160.375 articles were found: most of these were produced by England. In particular the most prolific institution was the University of London. Analyzing in detail the 100 most cited publications emerged that most of them were review published in journal with high impact factor (Q1). The University of Oxford was the institution with the greatest number of contributions (13%). The most cited topics were osteoarthritis (24%), followed by orthopedic basic science (22%). Bio-materials was the most common topic by ordering the 100 analyzed articles according to “usage count”, a recent indicator of the level of interest in a specific item. Conclusion: This bibliometric study can be useful to identify topics of interest for future scientific research and to outline the features that make some publications more interesting than others. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8343746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83437462021-08-23 Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature Mani, Olimpia Nucci, Anna Maria Scaglione, Michelangelo Bonicoli, Enrico Parchi, Paolo Domenico Piolanti, Nicola Acta Biomed Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this bibliometric study was to summarize European orthopedic literature produced by EFORT memberships between 2009 and 2019 and to identify the 100 most cited articles, analyzing the characteristics that made them so interesting for the orthopedic scientific world. METHOD: A search of the literature was conducted using Clarivate Analytics Web of Science in the subject category “orthopaedics”; then the results were summarized using Web of Science tools. RESULTS: A total of 160.375 articles were found: most of these were produced by England. In particular the most prolific institution was the University of London. Analyzing in detail the 100 most cited publications emerged that most of them were review published in journal with high impact factor (Q1). The University of Oxford was the institution with the greatest number of contributions (13%). The most cited topics were osteoarthritis (24%), followed by orthopedic basic science (22%). Bio-materials was the most common topic by ordering the 100 analyzed articles according to “usage count”, a recent indicator of the level of interest in a specific item. Conclusion: This bibliometric study can be useful to identify topics of interest for future scientific research and to outline the features that make some publications more interesting than others. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2021 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8343746/ /pubmed/34212934 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i3.9512 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Mani, Olimpia
Nucci, Anna Maria
Scaglione, Michelangelo
Bonicoli, Enrico
Parchi, Paolo Domenico
Piolanti, Nicola
Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature
title Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature
title_full Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature
title_fullStr Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature
title_short Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature
title_sort bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of european orthopaedic literature
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212934
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i3.9512
work_keys_str_mv AT maniolimpia bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature
AT nucciannamaria bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature
AT scaglionemichelangelo bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature
AT bonicolienrico bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature
AT parchipaolodomenico bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature
AT piolantinicola bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature