Cargando…
Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature
PURPOSE: The purpose of this bibliometric study was to summarize European orthopedic literature produced by EFORT memberships between 2009 and 2019 and to identify the 100 most cited articles, analyzing the characteristics that made them so interesting for the orthopedic scientific world. METHOD: A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mattioli 1885
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212934 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i3.9512 |
_version_ | 1783734349958479872 |
---|---|
author | Mani, Olimpia Nucci, Anna Maria Scaglione, Michelangelo Bonicoli, Enrico Parchi, Paolo Domenico Piolanti, Nicola |
author_facet | Mani, Olimpia Nucci, Anna Maria Scaglione, Michelangelo Bonicoli, Enrico Parchi, Paolo Domenico Piolanti, Nicola |
author_sort | Mani, Olimpia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this bibliometric study was to summarize European orthopedic literature produced by EFORT memberships between 2009 and 2019 and to identify the 100 most cited articles, analyzing the characteristics that made them so interesting for the orthopedic scientific world. METHOD: A search of the literature was conducted using Clarivate Analytics Web of Science in the subject category “orthopaedics”; then the results were summarized using Web of Science tools. RESULTS: A total of 160.375 articles were found: most of these were produced by England. In particular the most prolific institution was the University of London. Analyzing in detail the 100 most cited publications emerged that most of them were review published in journal with high impact factor (Q1). The University of Oxford was the institution with the greatest number of contributions (13%). The most cited topics were osteoarthritis (24%), followed by orthopedic basic science (22%). Bio-materials was the most common topic by ordering the 100 analyzed articles according to “usage count”, a recent indicator of the level of interest in a specific item. Conclusion: This bibliometric study can be useful to identify topics of interest for future scientific research and to outline the features that make some publications more interesting than others. (www.actabiomedica.it) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8343746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Mattioli 1885 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83437462021-08-23 Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature Mani, Olimpia Nucci, Anna Maria Scaglione, Michelangelo Bonicoli, Enrico Parchi, Paolo Domenico Piolanti, Nicola Acta Biomed Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this bibliometric study was to summarize European orthopedic literature produced by EFORT memberships between 2009 and 2019 and to identify the 100 most cited articles, analyzing the characteristics that made them so interesting for the orthopedic scientific world. METHOD: A search of the literature was conducted using Clarivate Analytics Web of Science in the subject category “orthopaedics”; then the results were summarized using Web of Science tools. RESULTS: A total of 160.375 articles were found: most of these were produced by England. In particular the most prolific institution was the University of London. Analyzing in detail the 100 most cited publications emerged that most of them were review published in journal with high impact factor (Q1). The University of Oxford was the institution with the greatest number of contributions (13%). The most cited topics were osteoarthritis (24%), followed by orthopedic basic science (22%). Bio-materials was the most common topic by ordering the 100 analyzed articles according to “usage count”, a recent indicator of the level of interest in a specific item. Conclusion: This bibliometric study can be useful to identify topics of interest for future scientific research and to outline the features that make some publications more interesting than others. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2021 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8343746/ /pubmed/34212934 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i3.9512 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mani, Olimpia Nucci, Anna Maria Scaglione, Michelangelo Bonicoli, Enrico Parchi, Paolo Domenico Piolanti, Nicola Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature |
title | Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature |
title_full | Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature |
title_fullStr | Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature |
title_short | Bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of European Orthopaedic literature |
title_sort | bibliometric trend analysis in a decade of european orthopaedic literature |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212934 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i3.9512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maniolimpia bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature AT nucciannamaria bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature AT scaglionemichelangelo bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature AT bonicolienrico bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature AT parchipaolodomenico bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature AT piolantinicola bibliometrictrendanalysisinadecadeofeuropeanorthopaedicliterature |