Cargando…

Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: analysis of patients’ satisfaction

BACKGROUND. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the patient-reported outcome after immediate ADM-assisted implant- based breast reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients underwent breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2019 have been retrospectively divided into group A (partial subp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Innocenti, Alessandro, Melita, Dario, Affortunati, Marco, Susini, Tommaso, Innocenti, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212931
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i3.9916
_version_ 1783734350190215168
author Innocenti, Alessandro
Melita, Dario
Affortunati, Marco
Susini, Tommaso
Innocenti, Marco
author_facet Innocenti, Alessandro
Melita, Dario
Affortunati, Marco
Susini, Tommaso
Innocenti, Marco
author_sort Innocenti, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the patient-reported outcome after immediate ADM-assisted implant- based breast reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients underwent breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2019 have been retrospectively divided into group A (partial subpectoral implant and ADM and group B (expander/implant). For each patient we evaluated retrospectively postoperative complications and patients’ satisfaction. RESULTS: 26 patients from the case group and 40 from the control group completed the BREAST-Q. The incidence of complications in the cases was 18.4%, while in the control group was 20.4%. We found no statistical difference in most of the domains and in the mean score of the questionnaire (mean score cases=69.0±14.4 vs controls=68.4±15.7; p=0.888). A significant difference results only in the domains Q2a and Q2b, sensation of rippling. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ADM in one-stage reconstruction allows to perform breast reconstruction in only one surgery, with similar complication rates and patient satisfaction. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8343747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83437472021-08-23 Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: analysis of patients’ satisfaction Innocenti, Alessandro Melita, Dario Affortunati, Marco Susini, Tommaso Innocenti, Marco Acta Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the patient-reported outcome after immediate ADM-assisted implant- based breast reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients underwent breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2019 have been retrospectively divided into group A (partial subpectoral implant and ADM and group B (expander/implant). For each patient we evaluated retrospectively postoperative complications and patients’ satisfaction. RESULTS: 26 patients from the case group and 40 from the control group completed the BREAST-Q. The incidence of complications in the cases was 18.4%, while in the control group was 20.4%. We found no statistical difference in most of the domains and in the mean score of the questionnaire (mean score cases=69.0±14.4 vs controls=68.4±15.7; p=0.888). A significant difference results only in the domains Q2a and Q2b, sensation of rippling. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ADM in one-stage reconstruction allows to perform breast reconstruction in only one surgery, with similar complication rates and patient satisfaction. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2021 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8343747/ /pubmed/34212931 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i3.9916 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Innocenti, Alessandro
Melita, Dario
Affortunati, Marco
Susini, Tommaso
Innocenti, Marco
Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: analysis of patients’ satisfaction
title Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: analysis of patients’ satisfaction
title_full Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: analysis of patients’ satisfaction
title_fullStr Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: analysis of patients’ satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: analysis of patients’ satisfaction
title_short Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: analysis of patients’ satisfaction
title_sort immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: analysis of patients’ satisfaction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212931
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i3.9916
work_keys_str_mv AT innocentialessandro immediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionwithtwostageexpanderimplantreconstructionversusonestagereconstructionwithacellulardermalmatrixanalysisofpatientssatisfaction
AT melitadario immediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionwithtwostageexpanderimplantreconstructionversusonestagereconstructionwithacellulardermalmatrixanalysisofpatientssatisfaction
AT affortunatimarco immediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionwithtwostageexpanderimplantreconstructionversusonestagereconstructionwithacellulardermalmatrixanalysisofpatientssatisfaction
AT susinitommaso immediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionwithtwostageexpanderimplantreconstructionversusonestagereconstructionwithacellulardermalmatrixanalysisofpatientssatisfaction
AT innocentimarco immediateimplantbasedbreastreconstructionwithtwostageexpanderimplantreconstructionversusonestagereconstructionwithacellulardermalmatrixanalysisofpatientssatisfaction