Cargando…

Comparison of Vandenbos procedure or Winograd method for ingrown toenail

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the outcomes of the Winograd method and Vandenbos procedure used to treat an ingrown toenail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2017 and February 2020, a total of 145 patients (65 males, 80 females; mean age: 31.45 years; range, 13 to 61 years) who were tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karacan, Erkan, Ertilav, Devran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145819
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2021.36
_version_ 1783734373980307456
author Karacan, Erkan
Ertilav, Devran
author_facet Karacan, Erkan
Ertilav, Devran
author_sort Karacan, Erkan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the outcomes of the Winograd method and Vandenbos procedure used to treat an ingrown toenail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2017 and February 2020, a total of 145 patients (65 males, 80 females; mean age: 31.45 years; range, 13 to 61 years) who were treated with Winograd or Vandenbos procedure for an ingrown toenail were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 70 underwent the Winograd method (Group 1) and 75 underwent the Vandenbos procedure (Group 2). Postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, demographic data, recurrence/complication rates, and satisfaction of patients were recorded. RESULTS: The mean recovery time was 11.8±2.6 days in Group 1 and 18.0±2.1 days in Group 2 (p<0.001). The mean VAS score was 3.9±0.7 in Group 1 and 7.2±1.0 in Group 2 (p<0.001) during the first postoperative week. Of the patients, 56 (80%) of 70 patients in Group 1 and 74 (98%) of 75 patients in Group 2 were satisfied with the surgery (p<0.001). In terms of cosmetics, 60 (85%) of the patients in Group 1 and 74 (98%) of the patients in Group 2 were satisfied (p=0.003). Recurrence was observed in 10 (14%) patients in Group 1, while no recurrence was observed in Group 2. Six (8.7%) patients in Group 1 and one (1.3%) patient in Group 2 developed complications. CONCLUSION: Low recurrence rates, high satisfaction, and good cosmetic results can be achieved with the Vandenbos procedure, while recovery time and return to work are faster with the Winograd method. The appropriate surgical technique should be selected based on the individual patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8343846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83438462021-08-13 Comparison of Vandenbos procedure or Winograd method for ingrown toenail Karacan, Erkan Ertilav, Devran Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the outcomes of the Winograd method and Vandenbos procedure used to treat an ingrown toenail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2017 and February 2020, a total of 145 patients (65 males, 80 females; mean age: 31.45 years; range, 13 to 61 years) who were treated with Winograd or Vandenbos procedure for an ingrown toenail were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 70 underwent the Winograd method (Group 1) and 75 underwent the Vandenbos procedure (Group 2). Postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, demographic data, recurrence/complication rates, and satisfaction of patients were recorded. RESULTS: The mean recovery time was 11.8±2.6 days in Group 1 and 18.0±2.1 days in Group 2 (p<0.001). The mean VAS score was 3.9±0.7 in Group 1 and 7.2±1.0 in Group 2 (p<0.001) during the first postoperative week. Of the patients, 56 (80%) of 70 patients in Group 1 and 74 (98%) of 75 patients in Group 2 were satisfied with the surgery (p<0.001). In terms of cosmetics, 60 (85%) of the patients in Group 1 and 74 (98%) of the patients in Group 2 were satisfied (p=0.003). Recurrence was observed in 10 (14%) patients in Group 1, while no recurrence was observed in Group 2. Six (8.7%) patients in Group 1 and one (1.3%) patient in Group 2 developed complications. CONCLUSION: Low recurrence rates, high satisfaction, and good cosmetic results can be achieved with the Vandenbos procedure, while recovery time and return to work are faster with the Winograd method. The appropriate surgical technique should be selected based on the individual patient. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8343846/ /pubmed/34145819 http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2021.36 Text en Copyright © 2021, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karacan, Erkan
Ertilav, Devran
Comparison of Vandenbos procedure or Winograd method for ingrown toenail
title Comparison of Vandenbos procedure or Winograd method for ingrown toenail
title_full Comparison of Vandenbos procedure or Winograd method for ingrown toenail
title_fullStr Comparison of Vandenbos procedure or Winograd method for ingrown toenail
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Vandenbos procedure or Winograd method for ingrown toenail
title_short Comparison of Vandenbos procedure or Winograd method for ingrown toenail
title_sort comparison of vandenbos procedure or winograd method for ingrown toenail
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145819
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2021.36
work_keys_str_mv AT karacanerkan comparisonofvandenbosprocedureorwinogradmethodforingrowntoenail
AT ertilavdevran comparisonofvandenbosprocedureorwinogradmethodforingrowntoenail