Cargando…

Differential effects of HIF2α antagonist and HIF2α silencing in renal cancer and sensitivity to repurposed drugs

BACKGROUND: In clear cell renal cell carcinoma, 80% of cases have biallelic inactivation of the VHL gene, leading to constitutive activation of both HIF1α and HIF2α. As HIF2α is the driver of the disease promoting tumour growth and metastasis, drugs targeting HIF2α have been developed. However, resi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnaiz, Esther, Miar, Ana, Bridges, Esther, Prasad, Naveen, Hatch, Stephanie B., Ebner, Daniel, Lawrie, Charles H., Harris, Adrian L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08616-8
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In clear cell renal cell carcinoma, 80% of cases have biallelic inactivation of the VHL gene, leading to constitutive activation of both HIF1α and HIF2α. As HIF2α is the driver of the disease promoting tumour growth and metastasis, drugs targeting HIF2α have been developed. However, resistance is common, therefore new therapies are needed. METHODS: We assessed the effect of the HIF2α antagonist PT2385 in several steps of tumour development and performed RNAseq to identify genes differentially expressed upon treatment. A drug screening was used to identify drugs with antiproliferative effects on VHL-mutated HIF2α-expressing cells and could increase effectiveness of PT2385. RESULTS: PT2385 did not reduce cell proliferation or clonogenicity but, in contrast to the genetic silencing of HIF2α, it reduced in vitro cell invasion. Many HIF-inducible genes were down-regulated upon PT2385 treatment, whereas some genes involved in cell migration or extracellular matrix were up-regulated. HIF2α was associated with resistance to statins, addition to PT2385 did not increase the sensitivity. Conclusions: this study shows key differences between inhibiting a target versus knockdown, which are potentially targetable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08616-8.