Cargando…

Implanted subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal bioscaffold seeded with hepatocyte-like cells: functional evaluation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The X-linked bleeding disorder, hemophilia A, is caused by defective production of factor VIII (FVIII). Hemophilic patients require regular FVIII infusions. Recombinant factor replacement poses the safest line of therapy. However, its main drawbacks are high expenses and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fares, Amal Elham, Gabr, Hala, ShamsEldeen, Asmaa Mohammed, Farghali, Haithem A. M., Rizk, Mazen Mohamed Salem Mohamed, Mahmoud, Bassem Essam, Tammam, Ahmed Bakr Ahmed, Mahmoud, Ayman Magdy Ahmed, Suliman, Alaa Abdulfattah Mahmoud, Ayyad, Mohamed Abdelhamid Ali, Ahmed, Sahar Hassan, Hassan, Rokia Mohamad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02531-2
_version_ 1783734433550958592
author Fares, Amal Elham
Gabr, Hala
ShamsEldeen, Asmaa Mohammed
Farghali, Haithem A. M.
Rizk, Mazen Mohamed Salem Mohamed
Mahmoud, Bassem Essam
Tammam, Ahmed Bakr Ahmed
Mahmoud, Ayman Magdy Ahmed
Suliman, Alaa Abdulfattah Mahmoud
Ayyad, Mohamed Abdelhamid Ali
Ahmed, Sahar Hassan
Hassan, Rokia Mohamad
author_facet Fares, Amal Elham
Gabr, Hala
ShamsEldeen, Asmaa Mohammed
Farghali, Haithem A. M.
Rizk, Mazen Mohamed Salem Mohamed
Mahmoud, Bassem Essam
Tammam, Ahmed Bakr Ahmed
Mahmoud, Ayman Magdy Ahmed
Suliman, Alaa Abdulfattah Mahmoud
Ayyad, Mohamed Abdelhamid Ali
Ahmed, Sahar Hassan
Hassan, Rokia Mohamad
author_sort Fares, Amal Elham
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The X-linked bleeding disorder, hemophilia A, is caused by defective production of factor VIII (FVIII). Hemophilic patients require regular FVIII infusions. Recombinant factor replacement poses the safest line of therapy. However, its main drawbacks are high expenses and the higher liability for formation of inhibitors. Recent studies confirmed the ability of bone marrow-derived stem cells to secrete FVIII. This study aims to generate bioscaffold from decellularized liver and subsequently seed it with trans-differentiated human stem cells into hepatic-like cells. This scaffold can then be implanted intraperitoneally or subcutaneously to provide FVIII. METHODS: After generation of the bioscaffold, seeding of discoid scaffolds with trans-differentiated human hepatocyte-like cells was performed. Then, the generated organoid was implanted into peritoneal cavity or subcutaneous tissue of experimental rats. RESULTS: Serum human FVIII was significantly increased in rats subjected to subcutaneous implantation compared intraperitoneal implantation. Immunostaining for detecting Cytokeratin 19 and human anti-globulin confirmed the presence of mature human hepatocytes that were significantly increased in subcutaneous implanted scaffold compared to the intraperitoneal one. CONCLUSION: Implantation of decellularized bioscaffold seeded with trans-differentiated stem cells in rats was successful to establish production of FVIII. Subcutaneous implantation showed higher FVIII levels than intraperitoneal implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8344159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83441592021-08-09 Implanted subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal bioscaffold seeded with hepatocyte-like cells: functional evaluation Fares, Amal Elham Gabr, Hala ShamsEldeen, Asmaa Mohammed Farghali, Haithem A. M. Rizk, Mazen Mohamed Salem Mohamed Mahmoud, Bassem Essam Tammam, Ahmed Bakr Ahmed Mahmoud, Ayman Magdy Ahmed Suliman, Alaa Abdulfattah Mahmoud Ayyad, Mohamed Abdelhamid Ali Ahmed, Sahar Hassan Hassan, Rokia Mohamad Stem Cell Res Ther Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The X-linked bleeding disorder, hemophilia A, is caused by defective production of factor VIII (FVIII). Hemophilic patients require regular FVIII infusions. Recombinant factor replacement poses the safest line of therapy. However, its main drawbacks are high expenses and the higher liability for formation of inhibitors. Recent studies confirmed the ability of bone marrow-derived stem cells to secrete FVIII. This study aims to generate bioscaffold from decellularized liver and subsequently seed it with trans-differentiated human stem cells into hepatic-like cells. This scaffold can then be implanted intraperitoneally or subcutaneously to provide FVIII. METHODS: After generation of the bioscaffold, seeding of discoid scaffolds with trans-differentiated human hepatocyte-like cells was performed. Then, the generated organoid was implanted into peritoneal cavity or subcutaneous tissue of experimental rats. RESULTS: Serum human FVIII was significantly increased in rats subjected to subcutaneous implantation compared intraperitoneal implantation. Immunostaining for detecting Cytokeratin 19 and human anti-globulin confirmed the presence of mature human hepatocytes that were significantly increased in subcutaneous implanted scaffold compared to the intraperitoneal one. CONCLUSION: Implantation of decellularized bioscaffold seeded with trans-differentiated stem cells in rats was successful to establish production of FVIII. Subcutaneous implantation showed higher FVIII levels than intraperitoneal implantation. BioMed Central 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8344159/ /pubmed/34362466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02531-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fares, Amal Elham
Gabr, Hala
ShamsEldeen, Asmaa Mohammed
Farghali, Haithem A. M.
Rizk, Mazen Mohamed Salem Mohamed
Mahmoud, Bassem Essam
Tammam, Ahmed Bakr Ahmed
Mahmoud, Ayman Magdy Ahmed
Suliman, Alaa Abdulfattah Mahmoud
Ayyad, Mohamed Abdelhamid Ali
Ahmed, Sahar Hassan
Hassan, Rokia Mohamad
Implanted subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal bioscaffold seeded with hepatocyte-like cells: functional evaluation
title Implanted subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal bioscaffold seeded with hepatocyte-like cells: functional evaluation
title_full Implanted subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal bioscaffold seeded with hepatocyte-like cells: functional evaluation
title_fullStr Implanted subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal bioscaffold seeded with hepatocyte-like cells: functional evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Implanted subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal bioscaffold seeded with hepatocyte-like cells: functional evaluation
title_short Implanted subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal bioscaffold seeded with hepatocyte-like cells: functional evaluation
title_sort implanted subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal bioscaffold seeded with hepatocyte-like cells: functional evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02531-2
work_keys_str_mv AT faresamalelham implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation
AT gabrhala implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation
AT shamseldeenasmaamohammed implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation
AT farghalihaithemam implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation
AT rizkmazenmohamedsalemmohamed implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation
AT mahmoudbassemessam implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation
AT tammamahmedbakrahmed implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation
AT mahmoudaymanmagdyahmed implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation
AT sulimanalaaabdulfattahmahmoud implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation
AT ayyadmohamedabdelhamidali implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation
AT ahmedsaharhassan implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation
AT hassanrokiamohamad implantedsubcutaneousversusintraperitonealbioscaffoldseededwithhepatocytelikecellsfunctionalevaluation