Cargando…

Evaluation of RNA isolation methods for microRNA quantification in a range of clinical biofluids

BACKGROUND: Extracellular microRNAs (miRNAs), released from cells into biofluids, have emerged as promising biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Several RNA isolation methods are available for the analysis of these cell-free miRNAs by RT-qPCR. Not all methods, however, are equally suit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roest, Henk P., IJzermans, Jan N. M., van der Laan, Luc J. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12896-021-00706-6
_version_ 1783734434019672064
author Roest, Henk P.
IJzermans, Jan N. M.
van der Laan, Luc J. W.
author_facet Roest, Henk P.
IJzermans, Jan N. M.
van der Laan, Luc J. W.
author_sort Roest, Henk P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extracellular microRNAs (miRNAs), released from cells into biofluids, have emerged as promising biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Several RNA isolation methods are available for the analysis of these cell-free miRNAs by RT-qPCR. Not all methods, however, are equally suitable for different biofluids. Here, we extracted total RNA from four very diverse biofluids: serum, urine, bile, and graft preservation fluid (perfusate). Four different protocols were used: a phenol-chloroform extraction and alcohol precipitation in combination with a precipitation carrier (QP) and three different column-based isolation methods, one with phenol-chloroform extraction (RN) and two without (NG and CU). For this range of clinical biofluid samples, we evaluated the potential of these different RNA isolation methods assessing recovery efficiency and the co-purification of RT-qPCR inhibiting compounds. RESULTS: Differences were observed between each of the RNA isolation methods in the recovery of cel-miR-39, a synthetic miRNA spiked in during the workup procedure, and for endogenous miRNAs. Co-purification of heparin, a known RT-qPCR inhibitor, was assessed using heparinase I during cDNA synthesis. RT-qPCR detection of synthetic miRNAs cel-miR-39, spiked in during RNA workup, cel-miR-54, spiked in during cDNA synthesis, and endogenous miRNAs was strongly improved in the presence of heparinase I for some, but not all, isolation methods. Other, co-isolated RT-qPCR inhibitors were not identified, except for biliverdin, which co-isolated from some bile samples with one of the methods. In addition, we observed that serum and urine contain compounds that enhance the binding of heparin to certain solid-phase columns. CONCLUSIONS: For reliable measurements of miRNA-based biomarkers in biofluids, optimization of RNA isolation procedures is recommended as methods can differ in miRNA detection and in co-purification of RT-qPCR inhibitory compounds. Heparinase I treatment confirmed that heparin appeared to be the major RT-qPCR inhibiting compound, but also biliverdin, co-isolated from bile, could interfere with detection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12896-021-00706-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8344161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83441612021-08-09 Evaluation of RNA isolation methods for microRNA quantification in a range of clinical biofluids Roest, Henk P. IJzermans, Jan N. M. van der Laan, Luc J. W. BMC Biotechnol Research Article BACKGROUND: Extracellular microRNAs (miRNAs), released from cells into biofluids, have emerged as promising biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Several RNA isolation methods are available for the analysis of these cell-free miRNAs by RT-qPCR. Not all methods, however, are equally suitable for different biofluids. Here, we extracted total RNA from four very diverse biofluids: serum, urine, bile, and graft preservation fluid (perfusate). Four different protocols were used: a phenol-chloroform extraction and alcohol precipitation in combination with a precipitation carrier (QP) and three different column-based isolation methods, one with phenol-chloroform extraction (RN) and two without (NG and CU). For this range of clinical biofluid samples, we evaluated the potential of these different RNA isolation methods assessing recovery efficiency and the co-purification of RT-qPCR inhibiting compounds. RESULTS: Differences were observed between each of the RNA isolation methods in the recovery of cel-miR-39, a synthetic miRNA spiked in during the workup procedure, and for endogenous miRNAs. Co-purification of heparin, a known RT-qPCR inhibitor, was assessed using heparinase I during cDNA synthesis. RT-qPCR detection of synthetic miRNAs cel-miR-39, spiked in during RNA workup, cel-miR-54, spiked in during cDNA synthesis, and endogenous miRNAs was strongly improved in the presence of heparinase I for some, but not all, isolation methods. Other, co-isolated RT-qPCR inhibitors were not identified, except for biliverdin, which co-isolated from some bile samples with one of the methods. In addition, we observed that serum and urine contain compounds that enhance the binding of heparin to certain solid-phase columns. CONCLUSIONS: For reliable measurements of miRNA-based biomarkers in biofluids, optimization of RNA isolation procedures is recommended as methods can differ in miRNA detection and in co-purification of RT-qPCR inhibitory compounds. Heparinase I treatment confirmed that heparin appeared to be the major RT-qPCR inhibiting compound, but also biliverdin, co-isolated from bile, could interfere with detection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12896-021-00706-6. BioMed Central 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8344161/ /pubmed/34362351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12896-021-00706-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roest, Henk P.
IJzermans, Jan N. M.
van der Laan, Luc J. W.
Evaluation of RNA isolation methods for microRNA quantification in a range of clinical biofluids
title Evaluation of RNA isolation methods for microRNA quantification in a range of clinical biofluids
title_full Evaluation of RNA isolation methods for microRNA quantification in a range of clinical biofluids
title_fullStr Evaluation of RNA isolation methods for microRNA quantification in a range of clinical biofluids
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of RNA isolation methods for microRNA quantification in a range of clinical biofluids
title_short Evaluation of RNA isolation methods for microRNA quantification in a range of clinical biofluids
title_sort evaluation of rna isolation methods for microrna quantification in a range of clinical biofluids
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12896-021-00706-6
work_keys_str_mv AT roesthenkp evaluationofrnaisolationmethodsformicrornaquantificationinarangeofclinicalbiofluids
AT ijzermansjannm evaluationofrnaisolationmethodsformicrornaquantificationinarangeofclinicalbiofluids
AT vanderlaanlucjw evaluationofrnaisolationmethodsformicrornaquantificationinarangeofclinicalbiofluids