Cargando…

Patient outcomes after electrical injury – a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION: People exposed to electrical injuries are often admitted to hospital for observation. Current evidence suggests that patients who have a normal ECG on admission after a low-voltage injury, with no loss of consciousness or initial cardiac arrest may be discharged home after a short obse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Jamal, Stenkula, Charlotte, Omar, Sherwan, Ghanima, Josef, Bremtun, Fredrik Førsund, Bergan, Jonas, Raouf, Nezar, Ghanima, Waleed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00920-3
_version_ 1783734441131114496
author Ahmed, Jamal
Stenkula, Charlotte
Omar, Sherwan
Ghanima, Josef
Bremtun, Fredrik Førsund
Bergan, Jonas
Raouf, Nezar
Ghanima, Waleed
author_facet Ahmed, Jamal
Stenkula, Charlotte
Omar, Sherwan
Ghanima, Josef
Bremtun, Fredrik Førsund
Bergan, Jonas
Raouf, Nezar
Ghanima, Waleed
author_sort Ahmed, Jamal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: People exposed to electrical injuries are often admitted to hospital for observation. Current evidence suggests that patients who have a normal ECG on admission after a low-voltage injury, with no loss of consciousness or initial cardiac arrest may be discharged home after a short observation time. Currently, there are no established standards for the duration of monitoring after electric shock, but 24 h of observation is the most commonly adopted approach. We carried out a retrospective study of patients admitted after electrical injuries to determine the in-hospital outcomes and 30-day mortality in these patients. METHODS: We performed a chart review of all patients with electrical injuries admitted to Østfold Hospital, Norway between the years 2001 and 2019, to determine in-hospital and 30-day mortality and the frequency of various cardiac and non-cardiac complications. RESULTS: Mean age of 465 included patients (88% males) was 31 years. Of all injuries, 329 (71%) were work-related, 17 (3.7%) involved loss of consciousness. Furthermore, 29/437 (6.6%) were high voltage (> 1000 V), and 243/401 (60.6%) were transthoracic injuries. 369 (79.4%) were discharged same day. None of the admitted patients died in hospital nor did any die within 30 days of admission, yielding a 30-day mortality of 0% (95% CI 0–0.8). At admission troponin was elevated in three (0.6%) patients, creatinine kinase (CK) in 30 (6.5%) and creatinine in six (1.3%). Electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities were described in 85 (18%) patients. No serious arrhythmias were detected. When comparing high- vs low-voltage or transthoracic vs other injuries, there were no significant differences between most of the outcomes, except for more ECG abnormalities in the transthoracic group, whereas more patients had elevated CK, and fewer discharged the same day in high-voltage injuries. CONCLUSION: No in-hospital nor 30-day mortality or serious arrhythmias were encountered in those who were assessed, regardless of the type of injury. Troponin and creatinine were rarely elevated. It seems that conscious patients admitted with a normal ECG following a low-voltage injury may safely be discharged home after a quick clinical assessment including ECG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8344194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83441942021-08-09 Patient outcomes after electrical injury – a retrospective study Ahmed, Jamal Stenkula, Charlotte Omar, Sherwan Ghanima, Josef Bremtun, Fredrik Førsund Bergan, Jonas Raouf, Nezar Ghanima, Waleed Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: People exposed to electrical injuries are often admitted to hospital for observation. Current evidence suggests that patients who have a normal ECG on admission after a low-voltage injury, with no loss of consciousness or initial cardiac arrest may be discharged home after a short observation time. Currently, there are no established standards for the duration of monitoring after electric shock, but 24 h of observation is the most commonly adopted approach. We carried out a retrospective study of patients admitted after electrical injuries to determine the in-hospital outcomes and 30-day mortality in these patients. METHODS: We performed a chart review of all patients with electrical injuries admitted to Østfold Hospital, Norway between the years 2001 and 2019, to determine in-hospital and 30-day mortality and the frequency of various cardiac and non-cardiac complications. RESULTS: Mean age of 465 included patients (88% males) was 31 years. Of all injuries, 329 (71%) were work-related, 17 (3.7%) involved loss of consciousness. Furthermore, 29/437 (6.6%) were high voltage (> 1000 V), and 243/401 (60.6%) were transthoracic injuries. 369 (79.4%) were discharged same day. None of the admitted patients died in hospital nor did any die within 30 days of admission, yielding a 30-day mortality of 0% (95% CI 0–0.8). At admission troponin was elevated in three (0.6%) patients, creatinine kinase (CK) in 30 (6.5%) and creatinine in six (1.3%). Electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities were described in 85 (18%) patients. No serious arrhythmias were detected. When comparing high- vs low-voltage or transthoracic vs other injuries, there were no significant differences between most of the outcomes, except for more ECG abnormalities in the transthoracic group, whereas more patients had elevated CK, and fewer discharged the same day in high-voltage injuries. CONCLUSION: No in-hospital nor 30-day mortality or serious arrhythmias were encountered in those who were assessed, regardless of the type of injury. Troponin and creatinine were rarely elevated. It seems that conscious patients admitted with a normal ECG following a low-voltage injury may safely be discharged home after a quick clinical assessment including ECG. BioMed Central 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8344194/ /pubmed/34362435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00920-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ahmed, Jamal
Stenkula, Charlotte
Omar, Sherwan
Ghanima, Josef
Bremtun, Fredrik Førsund
Bergan, Jonas
Raouf, Nezar
Ghanima, Waleed
Patient outcomes after electrical injury – a retrospective study
title Patient outcomes after electrical injury – a retrospective study
title_full Patient outcomes after electrical injury – a retrospective study
title_fullStr Patient outcomes after electrical injury – a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Patient outcomes after electrical injury – a retrospective study
title_short Patient outcomes after electrical injury – a retrospective study
title_sort patient outcomes after electrical injury – a retrospective study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00920-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedjamal patientoutcomesafterelectricalinjuryaretrospectivestudy
AT stenkulacharlotte patientoutcomesafterelectricalinjuryaretrospectivestudy
AT omarsherwan patientoutcomesafterelectricalinjuryaretrospectivestudy
AT ghanimajosef patientoutcomesafterelectricalinjuryaretrospectivestudy
AT bremtunfredrikførsund patientoutcomesafterelectricalinjuryaretrospectivestudy
AT berganjonas patientoutcomesafterelectricalinjuryaretrospectivestudy
AT raoufnezar patientoutcomesafterelectricalinjuryaretrospectivestudy
AT ghanimawaleed patientoutcomesafterelectricalinjuryaretrospectivestudy