Cargando…

Update on Noma: systematic review on classification, outcomes and follow-up of patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after Noma disease

INTRODUCTION: Noma is a significant yet neglected disease which affects some of the least developed countries in the world. The long-term benefit and safety of Noma surgical reconstructive missions have recently been under scrutiny due to a perceived lack of measurable outcomes and appropriate follo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Speiser, Sophie, Langridge, Benjamin, Birkl, Moira Melina, Kubiena, Harald, Rodgers, Will
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046303
_version_ 1783734456991875072
author Speiser, Sophie
Langridge, Benjamin
Birkl, Moira Melina
Kubiena, Harald
Rodgers, Will
author_facet Speiser, Sophie
Langridge, Benjamin
Birkl, Moira Melina
Kubiena, Harald
Rodgers, Will
author_sort Speiser, Sophie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Noma is a significant yet neglected disease which affects some of the least developed countries in the world. The long-term benefit and safety of Noma surgical reconstructive missions have recently been under scrutiny due to a perceived lack of measurable outcomes and appropriate follow-up. This study analyses and reports on classifications, outcome measurement tools and follow-up for reconstructive surgery after Noma disease. METHODS: This systematic review was undertaken following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The three medical databases Medline, EMBASE and Web of Sciences were searched, articles published between 1 January 1983 and 15 April 2020 were included. All primary evidence on reconstructive surgery following Noma disease, reporting data on outcome after surgery, follow-up time and complications were included. Extracted data were aggregated to generate overall and population corrected mean outcomes and complication rates. RESULTS: Out of 1393 identified records, 31 studies including 1110 Noma patients were analysed. NOITULP and Montandon/WHO were the most commonly used classification systems. Mouth opening (MO) and complication rates were the two most often reported outcomes. Overall mean complication rate was 44%, reported by 24 studies. Postoperative MO was reported by eight publications, of which, five reported long-term outcomes (>12 months). Mean MO improved by 20 mm when compared with mean population weighted preoperative MO (7 mm). At long-term follow-up, MO decreased to 20 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Studies reporting on neglected diseases in developing countries often lack methodological rigour. Surgeons should be mindful during patient examination by using a classification system that allows to compare preoperative versus postoperative state of disease. Short-term mission surgery is a vital part of healthcare delivery to underdeveloped and poor regions. Future missions should aim at sustainable partnerships with local healthcare providers to ensure postoperative care and long-term patient-oriented follow-up. A shift towards a diagonal treatment delivery approach, whereby local surgeons and healthcare staff are educated and empowered, should be actively promoted. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020181931.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8344268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83442682021-08-20 Update on Noma: systematic review on classification, outcomes and follow-up of patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after Noma disease Speiser, Sophie Langridge, Benjamin Birkl, Moira Melina Kubiena, Harald Rodgers, Will BMJ Open Global Health INTRODUCTION: Noma is a significant yet neglected disease which affects some of the least developed countries in the world. The long-term benefit and safety of Noma surgical reconstructive missions have recently been under scrutiny due to a perceived lack of measurable outcomes and appropriate follow-up. This study analyses and reports on classifications, outcome measurement tools and follow-up for reconstructive surgery after Noma disease. METHODS: This systematic review was undertaken following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The three medical databases Medline, EMBASE and Web of Sciences were searched, articles published between 1 January 1983 and 15 April 2020 were included. All primary evidence on reconstructive surgery following Noma disease, reporting data on outcome after surgery, follow-up time and complications were included. Extracted data were aggregated to generate overall and population corrected mean outcomes and complication rates. RESULTS: Out of 1393 identified records, 31 studies including 1110 Noma patients were analysed. NOITULP and Montandon/WHO were the most commonly used classification systems. Mouth opening (MO) and complication rates were the two most often reported outcomes. Overall mean complication rate was 44%, reported by 24 studies. Postoperative MO was reported by eight publications, of which, five reported long-term outcomes (>12 months). Mean MO improved by 20 mm when compared with mean population weighted preoperative MO (7 mm). At long-term follow-up, MO decreased to 20 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Studies reporting on neglected diseases in developing countries often lack methodological rigour. Surgeons should be mindful during patient examination by using a classification system that allows to compare preoperative versus postoperative state of disease. Short-term mission surgery is a vital part of healthcare delivery to underdeveloped and poor regions. Future missions should aim at sustainable partnerships with local healthcare providers to ensure postoperative care and long-term patient-oriented follow-up. A shift towards a diagonal treatment delivery approach, whereby local surgeons and healthcare staff are educated and empowered, should be actively promoted. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020181931. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8344268/ /pubmed/34353795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046303 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Global Health
Speiser, Sophie
Langridge, Benjamin
Birkl, Moira Melina
Kubiena, Harald
Rodgers, Will
Update on Noma: systematic review on classification, outcomes and follow-up of patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after Noma disease
title Update on Noma: systematic review on classification, outcomes and follow-up of patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after Noma disease
title_full Update on Noma: systematic review on classification, outcomes and follow-up of patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after Noma disease
title_fullStr Update on Noma: systematic review on classification, outcomes and follow-up of patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after Noma disease
title_full_unstemmed Update on Noma: systematic review on classification, outcomes and follow-up of patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after Noma disease
title_short Update on Noma: systematic review on classification, outcomes and follow-up of patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after Noma disease
title_sort update on noma: systematic review on classification, outcomes and follow-up of patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after noma disease
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34353795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046303
work_keys_str_mv AT speisersophie updateonnomasystematicreviewonclassificationoutcomesandfollowupofpatientsundergoingreconstructivesurgeryafternomadisease
AT langridgebenjamin updateonnomasystematicreviewonclassificationoutcomesandfollowupofpatientsundergoingreconstructivesurgeryafternomadisease
AT birklmoiramelina updateonnomasystematicreviewonclassificationoutcomesandfollowupofpatientsundergoingreconstructivesurgeryafternomadisease
AT kubienaharald updateonnomasystematicreviewonclassificationoutcomesandfollowupofpatientsundergoingreconstructivesurgeryafternomadisease
AT rodgerswill updateonnomasystematicreviewonclassificationoutcomesandfollowupofpatientsundergoingreconstructivesurgeryafternomadisease