Cargando…
Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study
INTRODUCTION: The Salford Lung Studies (SLS) were real-world randomised controlled trials set within UK primary care that assessed the effectiveness and safety of initiating once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol versus continuing usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34357561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01827-2 |
_version_ | 1783734465075347456 |
---|---|
author | Meeraus, Wilhelmine Fry, Mark Yeatman, Richard Pimenta, Jeanne M. Astrom, Jamila Barth, Alan McCorkindale, Sheila Jones, Rupert Leather, David |
author_facet | Meeraus, Wilhelmine Fry, Mark Yeatman, Richard Pimenta, Jeanne M. Astrom, Jamila Barth, Alan McCorkindale, Sheila Jones, Rupert Leather, David |
author_sort | Meeraus, Wilhelmine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Salford Lung Studies (SLS) were real-world randomised controlled trials set within UK primary care that assessed the effectiveness and safety of initiating once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol versus continuing usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Data were collected for a relatively short period, limiting the study of long-term outcomes. To broaden the capture of SLS patients’ data, we undertook the Extended SLS (Ext-SLS), aiming to better understand the patient disease journey and the effects of treatment in a real-world setting, through collection of patient-level data. Here, we present study design information and the challenges and learnings gathered in creating the Ext-SLS. METHODS: The Ext-SLS was intended to augment the SLS by collecting retrospective and prospective (up to 10 years from consent) primary and secondary care electronic health record (EHR) data and patient questionnaires. After ethics approval, general practitioners (GPs) obtained consent from SLS patients remotely (mean 3.2 years post-SLS completion). To facilitate GPs identifying eligible patients, a novel EHR-based approach flagged SLS patients who were alive and registered with their original GP. An automated system sent consent forms/questionnaires to patients. Medical data were collected via EHRs; primary care data were extracted from GPs’ systems whilst secondary care data were sourced from the UK NHS. RESULTS: Of the 75 GP sites from the SLS, 35 (47%) declined Ext-SLS participation leaving 4158 potentially eligible patients; 1169 (28%) patients were excluded as GPs could not confirm them as SLS participants or due to incapacity. Of 2989 patients invited, 1189 (40%) consented. CONCLUSIONS: Developing an EHR-based trial extension was achieved, with reasonable consent rates amongst invited patients. The resulting Ext-SLS is a unique and valuable research resource. Leveraging EHRs and technology reduced GP burden, facilitating participation. Initiation of extension studies prior to study close-out may help increase GP and patient participation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01827-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8344325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83443252021-08-09 Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study Meeraus, Wilhelmine Fry, Mark Yeatman, Richard Pimenta, Jeanne M. Astrom, Jamila Barth, Alan McCorkindale, Sheila Jones, Rupert Leather, David Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The Salford Lung Studies (SLS) were real-world randomised controlled trials set within UK primary care that assessed the effectiveness and safety of initiating once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol versus continuing usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Data were collected for a relatively short period, limiting the study of long-term outcomes. To broaden the capture of SLS patients’ data, we undertook the Extended SLS (Ext-SLS), aiming to better understand the patient disease journey and the effects of treatment in a real-world setting, through collection of patient-level data. Here, we present study design information and the challenges and learnings gathered in creating the Ext-SLS. METHODS: The Ext-SLS was intended to augment the SLS by collecting retrospective and prospective (up to 10 years from consent) primary and secondary care electronic health record (EHR) data and patient questionnaires. After ethics approval, general practitioners (GPs) obtained consent from SLS patients remotely (mean 3.2 years post-SLS completion). To facilitate GPs identifying eligible patients, a novel EHR-based approach flagged SLS patients who were alive and registered with their original GP. An automated system sent consent forms/questionnaires to patients. Medical data were collected via EHRs; primary care data were extracted from GPs’ systems whilst secondary care data were sourced from the UK NHS. RESULTS: Of the 75 GP sites from the SLS, 35 (47%) declined Ext-SLS participation leaving 4158 potentially eligible patients; 1169 (28%) patients were excluded as GPs could not confirm them as SLS participants or due to incapacity. Of 2989 patients invited, 1189 (40%) consented. CONCLUSIONS: Developing an EHR-based trial extension was achieved, with reasonable consent rates amongst invited patients. The resulting Ext-SLS is a unique and valuable research resource. Leveraging EHRs and technology reduced GP burden, facilitating participation. Initiation of extension studies prior to study close-out may help increase GP and patient participation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01827-2. Springer Healthcare 2021-08-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8344325/ /pubmed/34357561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01827-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Meeraus, Wilhelmine Fry, Mark Yeatman, Richard Pimenta, Jeanne M. Astrom, Jamila Barth, Alan McCorkindale, Sheila Jones, Rupert Leather, David Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study |
title | Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study |
title_full | Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study |
title_fullStr | Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study |
title_short | Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study |
title_sort | key learnings from running an extension study to a real-world effectiveness trial: the extended salford lung study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34357561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01827-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meerauswilhelmine keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy AT frymark keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy AT yeatmanrichard keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy AT pimentajeannem keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy AT astromjamila keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy AT barthalan keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy AT mccorkindalesheila keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy AT jonesrupert keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy AT leatherdavid keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy |