Cargando…

Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study

INTRODUCTION: The Salford Lung Studies (SLS) were real-world randomised controlled trials set within UK primary care that assessed the effectiveness and safety of initiating once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol versus continuing usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meeraus, Wilhelmine, Fry, Mark, Yeatman, Richard, Pimenta, Jeanne M., Astrom, Jamila, Barth, Alan, McCorkindale, Sheila, Jones, Rupert, Leather, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34357561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01827-2
_version_ 1783734465075347456
author Meeraus, Wilhelmine
Fry, Mark
Yeatman, Richard
Pimenta, Jeanne M.
Astrom, Jamila
Barth, Alan
McCorkindale, Sheila
Jones, Rupert
Leather, David
author_facet Meeraus, Wilhelmine
Fry, Mark
Yeatman, Richard
Pimenta, Jeanne M.
Astrom, Jamila
Barth, Alan
McCorkindale, Sheila
Jones, Rupert
Leather, David
author_sort Meeraus, Wilhelmine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Salford Lung Studies (SLS) were real-world randomised controlled trials set within UK primary care that assessed the effectiveness and safety of initiating once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol versus continuing usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Data were collected for a relatively short period, limiting the study of long-term outcomes. To broaden the capture of SLS patients’ data, we undertook the Extended SLS (Ext-SLS), aiming to better understand the patient disease journey and the effects of treatment in a real-world setting, through collection of patient-level data. Here, we present study design information and the challenges and learnings gathered in creating the Ext-SLS. METHODS: The Ext-SLS was intended to augment the SLS by collecting retrospective and prospective (up to 10 years from consent) primary and secondary care electronic health record (EHR) data and patient questionnaires. After ethics approval, general practitioners (GPs) obtained consent from SLS patients remotely (mean 3.2 years post-SLS completion). To facilitate GPs identifying eligible patients, a novel EHR-based approach flagged SLS patients who were alive and registered with their original GP. An automated system sent consent forms/questionnaires to patients. Medical data were collected via EHRs; primary care data were extracted from GPs’ systems whilst secondary care data were sourced from the UK NHS. RESULTS: Of the 75 GP sites from the SLS, 35 (47%) declined Ext-SLS participation leaving 4158 potentially eligible patients; 1169 (28%) patients were excluded as GPs could not confirm them as SLS participants or due to incapacity. Of 2989 patients invited, 1189 (40%) consented. CONCLUSIONS: Developing an EHR-based trial extension was achieved, with reasonable consent rates amongst invited patients. The resulting Ext-SLS is a unique and valuable research resource. Leveraging EHRs and technology reduced GP burden, facilitating participation. Initiation of extension studies prior to study close-out may help increase GP and patient participation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01827-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8344325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83443252021-08-09 Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study Meeraus, Wilhelmine Fry, Mark Yeatman, Richard Pimenta, Jeanne M. Astrom, Jamila Barth, Alan McCorkindale, Sheila Jones, Rupert Leather, David Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The Salford Lung Studies (SLS) were real-world randomised controlled trials set within UK primary care that assessed the effectiveness and safety of initiating once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol versus continuing usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Data were collected for a relatively short period, limiting the study of long-term outcomes. To broaden the capture of SLS patients’ data, we undertook the Extended SLS (Ext-SLS), aiming to better understand the patient disease journey and the effects of treatment in a real-world setting, through collection of patient-level data. Here, we present study design information and the challenges and learnings gathered in creating the Ext-SLS. METHODS: The Ext-SLS was intended to augment the SLS by collecting retrospective and prospective (up to 10 years from consent) primary and secondary care electronic health record (EHR) data and patient questionnaires. After ethics approval, general practitioners (GPs) obtained consent from SLS patients remotely (mean 3.2 years post-SLS completion). To facilitate GPs identifying eligible patients, a novel EHR-based approach flagged SLS patients who were alive and registered with their original GP. An automated system sent consent forms/questionnaires to patients. Medical data were collected via EHRs; primary care data were extracted from GPs’ systems whilst secondary care data were sourced from the UK NHS. RESULTS: Of the 75 GP sites from the SLS, 35 (47%) declined Ext-SLS participation leaving 4158 potentially eligible patients; 1169 (28%) patients were excluded as GPs could not confirm them as SLS participants or due to incapacity. Of 2989 patients invited, 1189 (40%) consented. CONCLUSIONS: Developing an EHR-based trial extension was achieved, with reasonable consent rates amongst invited patients. The resulting Ext-SLS is a unique and valuable research resource. Leveraging EHRs and technology reduced GP burden, facilitating participation. Initiation of extension studies prior to study close-out may help increase GP and patient participation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01827-2. Springer Healthcare 2021-08-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8344325/ /pubmed/34357561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01827-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Meeraus, Wilhelmine
Fry, Mark
Yeatman, Richard
Pimenta, Jeanne M.
Astrom, Jamila
Barth, Alan
McCorkindale, Sheila
Jones, Rupert
Leather, David
Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study
title Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study
title_full Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study
title_fullStr Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study
title_full_unstemmed Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study
title_short Key Learnings from Running an Extension Study to a Real-World Effectiveness Trial: The Extended Salford Lung Study
title_sort key learnings from running an extension study to a real-world effectiveness trial: the extended salford lung study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34357561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01827-2
work_keys_str_mv AT meerauswilhelmine keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy
AT frymark keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy
AT yeatmanrichard keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy
AT pimentajeannem keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy
AT astromjamila keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy
AT barthalan keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy
AT mccorkindalesheila keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy
AT jonesrupert keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy
AT leatherdavid keylearningsfromrunninganextensionstudytoarealworldeffectivenesstrialtheextendedsalfordlungstudy