Cargando…

Determining quarantine length and testing frequency for international border opening during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the closure or partial closure of international borders in almost all countries. Here, we investigate the efficacy of imported case detection considering quarantine length and different testing measures for travellers on arrival. METHODS: We examine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickens, Borame L, Koo, Joel R, Lim, Jue Tao, Park, Minah, Sun, Haoyang, Sun, Yinxiaohe, Zeng, Zitong, Quaye, Sharon Esi Duoduwa, Clapham, Hannah E, Wee, Hwee Lin, Cook, Alex R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taab088
_version_ 1783734481364975616
author Dickens, Borame L
Koo, Joel R
Lim, Jue Tao
Park, Minah
Sun, Haoyang
Sun, Yinxiaohe
Zeng, Zitong
Quaye, Sharon Esi Duoduwa
Clapham, Hannah E
Wee, Hwee Lin
Cook, Alex R
author_facet Dickens, Borame L
Koo, Joel R
Lim, Jue Tao
Park, Minah
Sun, Haoyang
Sun, Yinxiaohe
Zeng, Zitong
Quaye, Sharon Esi Duoduwa
Clapham, Hannah E
Wee, Hwee Lin
Cook, Alex R
author_sort Dickens, Borame L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the closure or partial closure of international borders in almost all countries. Here, we investigate the efficacy of imported case detection considering quarantine length and different testing measures for travellers on arrival. METHODS: We examine eight broad border control strategies from utilizing quarantine alone, pre-testing, entry and exit testing, and testing during quarantine. In comparing the efficacy of these strategies, we calculate the probability of detecting travellers who have been infected up to 2 weeks pre-departure according to their estimated incubation and infectious period. We estimate the number of undetected infected travellers permitted entry for these strategies across a prevalence range of 0.1–2% per million travellers. RESULTS: At 14-day quarantine, on average 2.2% (range: 0.5–8.2%) of imported infections are missed across the strategies, leading to 22 (5–82) imported cases at 0.1% prevalence per million travellers, increasing up to 430 (106–1641) at 2%. The strategy utilizing exit testing results in 3.9% (3.1–4.9%) of imported cases being missed at 7-day quarantine, down to 0.4% (0.3–0.7%) at 21-day quarantine, and the introduction of daily testing, as the most risk averse strategy, reduces the proportion further to 2.5–4.2% at day 7 and 0.1–0.2% at day 21 dependent on the tests used. Rapid antigen testing every 3 days in quarantine leads to 3% being missed at 7 days and 0.7% at 14 days, which is comparable to PCR testing with a 24-hour turnaround. CONCLUSIONS: Mandatory testing, at a minimal of pre-testing and on arrival, is strongly recommended where the length of quarantining should then be determined by the destination country’s level of risk averseness, pandemic preparedness and origin of travellers. Repeated testing during quarantining should also be utilized to mitigate case importation risk and reduce the quarantining duration required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8344539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83445392021-08-10 Determining quarantine length and testing frequency for international border opening during the COVID-19 pandemic Dickens, Borame L Koo, Joel R Lim, Jue Tao Park, Minah Sun, Haoyang Sun, Yinxiaohe Zeng, Zitong Quaye, Sharon Esi Duoduwa Clapham, Hannah E Wee, Hwee Lin Cook, Alex R J Travel Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the closure or partial closure of international borders in almost all countries. Here, we investigate the efficacy of imported case detection considering quarantine length and different testing measures for travellers on arrival. METHODS: We examine eight broad border control strategies from utilizing quarantine alone, pre-testing, entry and exit testing, and testing during quarantine. In comparing the efficacy of these strategies, we calculate the probability of detecting travellers who have been infected up to 2 weeks pre-departure according to their estimated incubation and infectious period. We estimate the number of undetected infected travellers permitted entry for these strategies across a prevalence range of 0.1–2% per million travellers. RESULTS: At 14-day quarantine, on average 2.2% (range: 0.5–8.2%) of imported infections are missed across the strategies, leading to 22 (5–82) imported cases at 0.1% prevalence per million travellers, increasing up to 430 (106–1641) at 2%. The strategy utilizing exit testing results in 3.9% (3.1–4.9%) of imported cases being missed at 7-day quarantine, down to 0.4% (0.3–0.7%) at 21-day quarantine, and the introduction of daily testing, as the most risk averse strategy, reduces the proportion further to 2.5–4.2% at day 7 and 0.1–0.2% at day 21 dependent on the tests used. Rapid antigen testing every 3 days in quarantine leads to 3% being missed at 7 days and 0.7% at 14 days, which is comparable to PCR testing with a 24-hour turnaround. CONCLUSIONS: Mandatory testing, at a minimal of pre-testing and on arrival, is strongly recommended where the length of quarantining should then be determined by the destination country’s level of risk averseness, pandemic preparedness and origin of travellers. Repeated testing during quarantining should also be utilized to mitigate case importation risk and reduce the quarantining duration required. Oxford University Press 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8344539/ /pubmed/34104959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taab088 Text en © International Society of Travel Medicine 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Dickens, Borame L
Koo, Joel R
Lim, Jue Tao
Park, Minah
Sun, Haoyang
Sun, Yinxiaohe
Zeng, Zitong
Quaye, Sharon Esi Duoduwa
Clapham, Hannah E
Wee, Hwee Lin
Cook, Alex R
Determining quarantine length and testing frequency for international border opening during the COVID-19 pandemic
title Determining quarantine length and testing frequency for international border opening during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Determining quarantine length and testing frequency for international border opening during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Determining quarantine length and testing frequency for international border opening during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Determining quarantine length and testing frequency for international border opening during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Determining quarantine length and testing frequency for international border opening during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort determining quarantine length and testing frequency for international border opening during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taab088
work_keys_str_mv AT dickensboramel determiningquarantinelengthandtestingfrequencyforinternationalborderopeningduringthecovid19pandemic
AT koojoelr determiningquarantinelengthandtestingfrequencyforinternationalborderopeningduringthecovid19pandemic
AT limjuetao determiningquarantinelengthandtestingfrequencyforinternationalborderopeningduringthecovid19pandemic
AT parkminah determiningquarantinelengthandtestingfrequencyforinternationalborderopeningduringthecovid19pandemic
AT sunhaoyang determiningquarantinelengthandtestingfrequencyforinternationalborderopeningduringthecovid19pandemic
AT sunyinxiaohe determiningquarantinelengthandtestingfrequencyforinternationalborderopeningduringthecovid19pandemic
AT zengzitong determiningquarantinelengthandtestingfrequencyforinternationalborderopeningduringthecovid19pandemic
AT quayesharonesiduoduwa determiningquarantinelengthandtestingfrequencyforinternationalborderopeningduringthecovid19pandemic
AT claphamhannahe determiningquarantinelengthandtestingfrequencyforinternationalborderopeningduringthecovid19pandemic
AT weehweelin determiningquarantinelengthandtestingfrequencyforinternationalborderopeningduringthecovid19pandemic
AT cookalexr determiningquarantinelengthandtestingfrequencyforinternationalborderopeningduringthecovid19pandemic