Cargando…
Meiotic Crossover Patterning
Proper number and placement of meiotic crossovers is vital to chromosome segregation, with failures in normal crossover distribution often resulting in aneuploidy and infertility. Meiotic crossovers are formed via homologous repair of programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs). Although DSBs occur throu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34368131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.681123 |
_version_ | 1783734507405312000 |
---|---|
author | Pazhayam, Nila M. Turcotte, Carolyn A. Sekelsky, Jeff |
author_facet | Pazhayam, Nila M. Turcotte, Carolyn A. Sekelsky, Jeff |
author_sort | Pazhayam, Nila M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Proper number and placement of meiotic crossovers is vital to chromosome segregation, with failures in normal crossover distribution often resulting in aneuploidy and infertility. Meiotic crossovers are formed via homologous repair of programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs). Although DSBs occur throughout the genome, crossover placement is intricately patterned, as observed first in early genetic studies by Muller and Sturtevant. Three types of patterning events have been identified. Interference, first described by Sturtevant in 1915, is a phenomenon in which crossovers on the same chromosome do not occur near one another. Assurance, initially identified by Owen in 1949, describes the phenomenon in which a minimum of one crossover is formed per chromosome pair. Suppression, first observed by Beadle in 1932, dictates that crossovers do not occur in regions surrounding the centromere and telomeres. The mechanisms behind crossover patterning remain largely unknown, and key players appear to act at all scales, from the DNA level to inter-chromosome interactions. There is also considerable overlap between the known players that drive each patterning phenomenon. In this review we discuss the history of studies of crossover patterning, developments in methods used in the field, and our current understanding of the interplay between patterning phenomena. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8344875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83448752021-08-07 Meiotic Crossover Patterning Pazhayam, Nila M. Turcotte, Carolyn A. Sekelsky, Jeff Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology Proper number and placement of meiotic crossovers is vital to chromosome segregation, with failures in normal crossover distribution often resulting in aneuploidy and infertility. Meiotic crossovers are formed via homologous repair of programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs). Although DSBs occur throughout the genome, crossover placement is intricately patterned, as observed first in early genetic studies by Muller and Sturtevant. Three types of patterning events have been identified. Interference, first described by Sturtevant in 1915, is a phenomenon in which crossovers on the same chromosome do not occur near one another. Assurance, initially identified by Owen in 1949, describes the phenomenon in which a minimum of one crossover is formed per chromosome pair. Suppression, first observed by Beadle in 1932, dictates that crossovers do not occur in regions surrounding the centromere and telomeres. The mechanisms behind crossover patterning remain largely unknown, and key players appear to act at all scales, from the DNA level to inter-chromosome interactions. There is also considerable overlap between the known players that drive each patterning phenomenon. In this review we discuss the history of studies of crossover patterning, developments in methods used in the field, and our current understanding of the interplay between patterning phenomena. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8344875/ /pubmed/34368131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.681123 Text en Copyright © 2021 Pazhayam, Turcotte and Sekelsky. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cell and Developmental Biology Pazhayam, Nila M. Turcotte, Carolyn A. Sekelsky, Jeff Meiotic Crossover Patterning |
title | Meiotic Crossover Patterning |
title_full | Meiotic Crossover Patterning |
title_fullStr | Meiotic Crossover Patterning |
title_full_unstemmed | Meiotic Crossover Patterning |
title_short | Meiotic Crossover Patterning |
title_sort | meiotic crossover patterning |
topic | Cell and Developmental Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34368131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.681123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pazhayamnilam meioticcrossoverpatterning AT turcottecarolyna meioticcrossoverpatterning AT sekelskyjeff meioticcrossoverpatterning |