Cargando…
Experts in science communication: A shift from neutral encyclopedia to equal participant in dialogue
Even if the predominant model of science communication with the public is now based on dialogue, many experts still adhere to the outdated deficit model of informing the public.[Image: see text]
Autores principales: | Houtman, Diewertje, Vijlbrief, Boy, Riedijk, Sam |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269513 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.202152988 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Changes in opinions about human germline gene editing as a result of the Dutch DNA-dialogue project
por: Houtman, Diewertje, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
“What if” should precede “whether” and “how” in the social conversation around human germline gene editing
por: Houtman, Diewertje, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
From deficit to dialogue in science communication: The dialogue communication model requires additional roles from scientists
por: Reincke, Cathelijne M, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Science dialogues: basic concepts and tools for effective science communication
por: Cerrato, Simona
Publicado: (2015) -
Un intense dialogue entre science et religion ouvrirait á l'humanité des perspectives fécondes
por: Ferrier, J C
Publicado: (1982)