Cargando…

From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients

SIMPLE SUMMARY: An evaluation process and adequate referrals are an important part of a distress screening program but insufficient consideration is given to referrals and uptake of available supportive services. Identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is needed to implement a screeni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meggiolaro, Elena, De Padova, Silvia, Ruffilli, Federica, Bertelli, Tatiana, Bragagni, Marina, Prati, Sabrina, Pisotti, Lidia, Massa, Ilaria, Foca, Flavia, Tamberi, Stefano, De Giorgi, Ugo, Zerbinati, Luigi, Tiberto, Elisa, Grassi, Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153761
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: An evaluation process and adequate referrals are an important part of a distress screening program but insufficient consideration is given to referrals and uptake of available supportive services. Identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is needed to implement a screening-for-distress policy in a clinical cancer setting, as confirmed in the present study. It is vital to reach and motivate the highest possible number of patients to be referred to psycho-oncology services when needed. A multidisciplinary approach could help to raise awareness of the benefit of screening for distress, the implementation of which would improve uptake. ABSTRACT: Introduction: Little consideration is given to the referral and uptake of available supportive services after distress screening. However, identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is mandatory for implementing a screening policy. The present study explored the practical usefulness of and potential barriers to the application of distress management. Methods: 406 cancer patients were consecutively selected and asked to complete the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem Check List (PL). All patients with a DT score ≥6 were invited for a post-DT telephone interview with a trained psychologist. Results: The 112 patients who refused to take part were more often older, retired, at a more advanced stage of illness, and with no previous experience of psychological intervention with respect to those who accepted. Of the 78 patients with a score ≥6 who were referred to the Psycho-Oncology Service, 65.4% accepted the telephone interview. Twenty-two patients rejected the initial invitation immediately for various reasons including logistic difficulties, physical problems, and feeling embarrassed about opening up to a psychologist. Conclusions: Our study confirms that screening per sé is insufficient to deal with the problem of distress and that more emphasis should be placed on implementing referral and treatment.