Cargando…

From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients

SIMPLE SUMMARY: An evaluation process and adequate referrals are an important part of a distress screening program but insufficient consideration is given to referrals and uptake of available supportive services. Identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is needed to implement a screeni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meggiolaro, Elena, De Padova, Silvia, Ruffilli, Federica, Bertelli, Tatiana, Bragagni, Marina, Prati, Sabrina, Pisotti, Lidia, Massa, Ilaria, Foca, Flavia, Tamberi, Stefano, De Giorgi, Ugo, Zerbinati, Luigi, Tiberto, Elisa, Grassi, Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153761
_version_ 1783734549394489344
author Meggiolaro, Elena
De Padova, Silvia
Ruffilli, Federica
Bertelli, Tatiana
Bragagni, Marina
Prati, Sabrina
Pisotti, Lidia
Massa, Ilaria
Foca, Flavia
Tamberi, Stefano
De Giorgi, Ugo
Zerbinati, Luigi
Tiberto, Elisa
Grassi, Luigi
author_facet Meggiolaro, Elena
De Padova, Silvia
Ruffilli, Federica
Bertelli, Tatiana
Bragagni, Marina
Prati, Sabrina
Pisotti, Lidia
Massa, Ilaria
Foca, Flavia
Tamberi, Stefano
De Giorgi, Ugo
Zerbinati, Luigi
Tiberto, Elisa
Grassi, Luigi
author_sort Meggiolaro, Elena
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: An evaluation process and adequate referrals are an important part of a distress screening program but insufficient consideration is given to referrals and uptake of available supportive services. Identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is needed to implement a screening-for-distress policy in a clinical cancer setting, as confirmed in the present study. It is vital to reach and motivate the highest possible number of patients to be referred to psycho-oncology services when needed. A multidisciplinary approach could help to raise awareness of the benefit of screening for distress, the implementation of which would improve uptake. ABSTRACT: Introduction: Little consideration is given to the referral and uptake of available supportive services after distress screening. However, identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is mandatory for implementing a screening policy. The present study explored the practical usefulness of and potential barriers to the application of distress management. Methods: 406 cancer patients were consecutively selected and asked to complete the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem Check List (PL). All patients with a DT score ≥6 were invited for a post-DT telephone interview with a trained psychologist. Results: The 112 patients who refused to take part were more often older, retired, at a more advanced stage of illness, and with no previous experience of psychological intervention with respect to those who accepted. Of the 78 patients with a score ≥6 who were referred to the Psycho-Oncology Service, 65.4% accepted the telephone interview. Twenty-two patients rejected the initial invitation immediately for various reasons including logistic difficulties, physical problems, and feeling embarrassed about opening up to a psychologist. Conclusions: Our study confirms that screening per sé is insufficient to deal with the problem of distress and that more emphasis should be placed on implementing referral and treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8345103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83451032021-08-07 From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients Meggiolaro, Elena De Padova, Silvia Ruffilli, Federica Bertelli, Tatiana Bragagni, Marina Prati, Sabrina Pisotti, Lidia Massa, Ilaria Foca, Flavia Tamberi, Stefano De Giorgi, Ugo Zerbinati, Luigi Tiberto, Elisa Grassi, Luigi Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: An evaluation process and adequate referrals are an important part of a distress screening program but insufficient consideration is given to referrals and uptake of available supportive services. Identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is needed to implement a screening-for-distress policy in a clinical cancer setting, as confirmed in the present study. It is vital to reach and motivate the highest possible number of patients to be referred to psycho-oncology services when needed. A multidisciplinary approach could help to raise awareness of the benefit of screening for distress, the implementation of which would improve uptake. ABSTRACT: Introduction: Little consideration is given to the referral and uptake of available supportive services after distress screening. However, identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is mandatory for implementing a screening policy. The present study explored the practical usefulness of and potential barriers to the application of distress management. Methods: 406 cancer patients were consecutively selected and asked to complete the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem Check List (PL). All patients with a DT score ≥6 were invited for a post-DT telephone interview with a trained psychologist. Results: The 112 patients who refused to take part were more often older, retired, at a more advanced stage of illness, and with no previous experience of psychological intervention with respect to those who accepted. Of the 78 patients with a score ≥6 who were referred to the Psycho-Oncology Service, 65.4% accepted the telephone interview. Twenty-two patients rejected the initial invitation immediately for various reasons including logistic difficulties, physical problems, and feeling embarrassed about opening up to a psychologist. Conclusions: Our study confirms that screening per sé is insufficient to deal with the problem of distress and that more emphasis should be placed on implementing referral and treatment. MDPI 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8345103/ /pubmed/34359662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153761 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Meggiolaro, Elena
De Padova, Silvia
Ruffilli, Federica
Bertelli, Tatiana
Bragagni, Marina
Prati, Sabrina
Pisotti, Lidia
Massa, Ilaria
Foca, Flavia
Tamberi, Stefano
De Giorgi, Ugo
Zerbinati, Luigi
Tiberto, Elisa
Grassi, Luigi
From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients
title From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients
title_full From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients
title_fullStr From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients
title_short From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients
title_sort from distress screening to uptake: an italian multicenter study of cancer patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153761
work_keys_str_mv AT meggiolaroelena fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT depadovasilvia fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT ruffillifederica fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT bertellitatiana fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT bragagnimarina fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT pratisabrina fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT pisottilidia fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT massailaria fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT focaflavia fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT tamberistefano fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT degiorgiugo fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT zerbinatiluigi fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT tibertoelisa fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients
AT grassiluigi fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients