Cargando…
From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients
SIMPLE SUMMARY: An evaluation process and adequate referrals are an important part of a distress screening program but insufficient consideration is given to referrals and uptake of available supportive services. Identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is needed to implement a screeni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153761 |
_version_ | 1783734549394489344 |
---|---|
author | Meggiolaro, Elena De Padova, Silvia Ruffilli, Federica Bertelli, Tatiana Bragagni, Marina Prati, Sabrina Pisotti, Lidia Massa, Ilaria Foca, Flavia Tamberi, Stefano De Giorgi, Ugo Zerbinati, Luigi Tiberto, Elisa Grassi, Luigi |
author_facet | Meggiolaro, Elena De Padova, Silvia Ruffilli, Federica Bertelli, Tatiana Bragagni, Marina Prati, Sabrina Pisotti, Lidia Massa, Ilaria Foca, Flavia Tamberi, Stefano De Giorgi, Ugo Zerbinati, Luigi Tiberto, Elisa Grassi, Luigi |
author_sort | Meggiolaro, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: An evaluation process and adequate referrals are an important part of a distress screening program but insufficient consideration is given to referrals and uptake of available supportive services. Identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is needed to implement a screening-for-distress policy in a clinical cancer setting, as confirmed in the present study. It is vital to reach and motivate the highest possible number of patients to be referred to psycho-oncology services when needed. A multidisciplinary approach could help to raise awareness of the benefit of screening for distress, the implementation of which would improve uptake. ABSTRACT: Introduction: Little consideration is given to the referral and uptake of available supportive services after distress screening. However, identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is mandatory for implementing a screening policy. The present study explored the practical usefulness of and potential barriers to the application of distress management. Methods: 406 cancer patients were consecutively selected and asked to complete the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem Check List (PL). All patients with a DT score ≥6 were invited for a post-DT telephone interview with a trained psychologist. Results: The 112 patients who refused to take part were more often older, retired, at a more advanced stage of illness, and with no previous experience of psychological intervention with respect to those who accepted. Of the 78 patients with a score ≥6 who were referred to the Psycho-Oncology Service, 65.4% accepted the telephone interview. Twenty-two patients rejected the initial invitation immediately for various reasons including logistic difficulties, physical problems, and feeling embarrassed about opening up to a psychologist. Conclusions: Our study confirms that screening per sé is insufficient to deal with the problem of distress and that more emphasis should be placed on implementing referral and treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8345103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83451032021-08-07 From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients Meggiolaro, Elena De Padova, Silvia Ruffilli, Federica Bertelli, Tatiana Bragagni, Marina Prati, Sabrina Pisotti, Lidia Massa, Ilaria Foca, Flavia Tamberi, Stefano De Giorgi, Ugo Zerbinati, Luigi Tiberto, Elisa Grassi, Luigi Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: An evaluation process and adequate referrals are an important part of a distress screening program but insufficient consideration is given to referrals and uptake of available supportive services. Identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is needed to implement a screening-for-distress policy in a clinical cancer setting, as confirmed in the present study. It is vital to reach and motivate the highest possible number of patients to be referred to psycho-oncology services when needed. A multidisciplinary approach could help to raise awareness of the benefit of screening for distress, the implementation of which would improve uptake. ABSTRACT: Introduction: Little consideration is given to the referral and uptake of available supportive services after distress screening. However, identifying the reasons for accepting or refusing help is mandatory for implementing a screening policy. The present study explored the practical usefulness of and potential barriers to the application of distress management. Methods: 406 cancer patients were consecutively selected and asked to complete the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem Check List (PL). All patients with a DT score ≥6 were invited for a post-DT telephone interview with a trained psychologist. Results: The 112 patients who refused to take part were more often older, retired, at a more advanced stage of illness, and with no previous experience of psychological intervention with respect to those who accepted. Of the 78 patients with a score ≥6 who were referred to the Psycho-Oncology Service, 65.4% accepted the telephone interview. Twenty-two patients rejected the initial invitation immediately for various reasons including logistic difficulties, physical problems, and feeling embarrassed about opening up to a psychologist. Conclusions: Our study confirms that screening per sé is insufficient to deal with the problem of distress and that more emphasis should be placed on implementing referral and treatment. MDPI 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8345103/ /pubmed/34359662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153761 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Meggiolaro, Elena De Padova, Silvia Ruffilli, Federica Bertelli, Tatiana Bragagni, Marina Prati, Sabrina Pisotti, Lidia Massa, Ilaria Foca, Flavia Tamberi, Stefano De Giorgi, Ugo Zerbinati, Luigi Tiberto, Elisa Grassi, Luigi From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients |
title | From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients |
title_full | From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients |
title_fullStr | From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients |
title_short | From Distress Screening to Uptake: An Italian Multicenter Study of Cancer Patients |
title_sort | from distress screening to uptake: an italian multicenter study of cancer patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meggiolaroelena fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT depadovasilvia fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT ruffillifederica fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT bertellitatiana fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT bragagnimarina fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT pratisabrina fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT pisottilidia fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT massailaria fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT focaflavia fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT tamberistefano fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT degiorgiugo fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT zerbinatiluigi fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT tibertoelisa fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients AT grassiluigi fromdistressscreeningtouptakeanitalianmulticenterstudyofcancerpatients |