Cargando…
Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach
SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this study, we present a simple but comprehensive molecular analysis of gastric carcinoma. The two major existing classification schemes show some discrepancies and are highly technically demanding, which makes them hardly feasible in daily diagnostic routines. Our workflow is bas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153722 |
_version_ | 1783734577084235776 |
---|---|
author | Daun, Till Nienhold, Ronny Paasinen-Sohns, Aino Frank, Angela Sachs, Melanie Zlobec, Inti Cathomas, Gieri |
author_facet | Daun, Till Nienhold, Ronny Paasinen-Sohns, Aino Frank, Angela Sachs, Melanie Zlobec, Inti Cathomas, Gieri |
author_sort | Daun, Till |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this study, we present a simple but comprehensive molecular analysis of gastric carcinoma. The two major existing classification schemes show some discrepancies and are highly technically demanding, which makes them hardly feasible in daily diagnostic routines. Our workflow is based on simple and commercially available technology and provides a potential consensus approach by integrating the two major classification schemes. Furthermore, our approach allows the molecular subtypes to be assigned to different prognostic groups. We are convinced that our approach may help to better understand the molecular mechanisms of this worldwide health burden and that it could pave the way for new therapeutic targets. ABSTRACT: Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is a heterogeneous disease and at least two major studies have recently provided a molecular classification for this tumor: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Asian Cancer Research Group (ARCG). Both classifications quote four molecular subtypes, but these subtypes only partially overlap. In addition, the classifications are based on complex and cost-intensive technologies, which are hardly feasible for everyday practice. Therefore, simplified approaches using immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH) as well as commercially available next generation sequencing (NGS) have been considered for routine use. In the present study, we screened 115 GAC by IHC for p53, MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1) and E-cadherin and performed ISH for Epstein–Barr virus (EBV). In addition, sequencing by NGS for TP53 and tumor associated genes was performed. With this approach, we were able to define five subtypes of GAC: (1) Microsatellite Instable (MSI), (2) EBV-associated, (3) Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT)-like, (4) p53 aberrant tumors surrogating for chromosomal instability and (5) p53 proficient tumors surrogating for genomics stable cancers. Furthermore, by considering lymph node metastasis in the p53 aberrant GAC, a better prognostic stratification was achieved which finally allowed us to separate the GAC highly significant in a group with poor and good-to-intermediate prognosis, respectively. Our data show that molecular classification of GAC can be achieved by using commercially available assays including IHC, ISH and NGS. Furthermore, we present an integrative workflow, which has the potential to overcome the uncertainty resulting from discrepancies from existing classification schemes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8345215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83452152021-08-07 Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach Daun, Till Nienhold, Ronny Paasinen-Sohns, Aino Frank, Angela Sachs, Melanie Zlobec, Inti Cathomas, Gieri Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this study, we present a simple but comprehensive molecular analysis of gastric carcinoma. The two major existing classification schemes show some discrepancies and are highly technically demanding, which makes them hardly feasible in daily diagnostic routines. Our workflow is based on simple and commercially available technology and provides a potential consensus approach by integrating the two major classification schemes. Furthermore, our approach allows the molecular subtypes to be assigned to different prognostic groups. We are convinced that our approach may help to better understand the molecular mechanisms of this worldwide health burden and that it could pave the way for new therapeutic targets. ABSTRACT: Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is a heterogeneous disease and at least two major studies have recently provided a molecular classification for this tumor: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Asian Cancer Research Group (ARCG). Both classifications quote four molecular subtypes, but these subtypes only partially overlap. In addition, the classifications are based on complex and cost-intensive technologies, which are hardly feasible for everyday practice. Therefore, simplified approaches using immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH) as well as commercially available next generation sequencing (NGS) have been considered for routine use. In the present study, we screened 115 GAC by IHC for p53, MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1) and E-cadherin and performed ISH for Epstein–Barr virus (EBV). In addition, sequencing by NGS for TP53 and tumor associated genes was performed. With this approach, we were able to define five subtypes of GAC: (1) Microsatellite Instable (MSI), (2) EBV-associated, (3) Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT)-like, (4) p53 aberrant tumors surrogating for chromosomal instability and (5) p53 proficient tumors surrogating for genomics stable cancers. Furthermore, by considering lymph node metastasis in the p53 aberrant GAC, a better prognostic stratification was achieved which finally allowed us to separate the GAC highly significant in a group with poor and good-to-intermediate prognosis, respectively. Our data show that molecular classification of GAC can be achieved by using commercially available assays including IHC, ISH and NGS. Furthermore, we present an integrative workflow, which has the potential to overcome the uncertainty resulting from discrepancies from existing classification schemes. MDPI 2021-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8345215/ /pubmed/34359622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153722 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Daun, Till Nienhold, Ronny Paasinen-Sohns, Aino Frank, Angela Sachs, Melanie Zlobec, Inti Cathomas, Gieri Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach |
title | Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach |
title_full | Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach |
title_fullStr | Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach |
title_short | Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach |
title_sort | combined simplified molecular classification of gastric adenocarcinoma, enhanced by lymph node status: an integrative approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153722 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dauntill combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach AT nienholdronny combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach AT paasinensohnsaino combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach AT frankangela combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach AT sachsmelanie combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach AT zlobecinti combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach AT cathomasgieri combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach |