Cargando…

Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach

SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this study, we present a simple but comprehensive molecular analysis of gastric carcinoma. The two major existing classification schemes show some discrepancies and are highly technically demanding, which makes them hardly feasible in daily diagnostic routines. Our workflow is bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daun, Till, Nienhold, Ronny, Paasinen-Sohns, Aino, Frank, Angela, Sachs, Melanie, Zlobec, Inti, Cathomas, Gieri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153722
_version_ 1783734577084235776
author Daun, Till
Nienhold, Ronny
Paasinen-Sohns, Aino
Frank, Angela
Sachs, Melanie
Zlobec, Inti
Cathomas, Gieri
author_facet Daun, Till
Nienhold, Ronny
Paasinen-Sohns, Aino
Frank, Angela
Sachs, Melanie
Zlobec, Inti
Cathomas, Gieri
author_sort Daun, Till
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this study, we present a simple but comprehensive molecular analysis of gastric carcinoma. The two major existing classification schemes show some discrepancies and are highly technically demanding, which makes them hardly feasible in daily diagnostic routines. Our workflow is based on simple and commercially available technology and provides a potential consensus approach by integrating the two major classification schemes. Furthermore, our approach allows the molecular subtypes to be assigned to different prognostic groups. We are convinced that our approach may help to better understand the molecular mechanisms of this worldwide health burden and that it could pave the way for new therapeutic targets. ABSTRACT: Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is a heterogeneous disease and at least two major studies have recently provided a molecular classification for this tumor: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Asian Cancer Research Group (ARCG). Both classifications quote four molecular subtypes, but these subtypes only partially overlap. In addition, the classifications are based on complex and cost-intensive technologies, which are hardly feasible for everyday practice. Therefore, simplified approaches using immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH) as well as commercially available next generation sequencing (NGS) have been considered for routine use. In the present study, we screened 115 GAC by IHC for p53, MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1) and E-cadherin and performed ISH for Epstein–Barr virus (EBV). In addition, sequencing by NGS for TP53 and tumor associated genes was performed. With this approach, we were able to define five subtypes of GAC: (1) Microsatellite Instable (MSI), (2) EBV-associated, (3) Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT)-like, (4) p53 aberrant tumors surrogating for chromosomal instability and (5) p53 proficient tumors surrogating for genomics stable cancers. Furthermore, by considering lymph node metastasis in the p53 aberrant GAC, a better prognostic stratification was achieved which finally allowed us to separate the GAC highly significant in a group with poor and good-to-intermediate prognosis, respectively. Our data show that molecular classification of GAC can be achieved by using commercially available assays including IHC, ISH and NGS. Furthermore, we present an integrative workflow, which has the potential to overcome the uncertainty resulting from discrepancies from existing classification schemes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8345215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83452152021-08-07 Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach Daun, Till Nienhold, Ronny Paasinen-Sohns, Aino Frank, Angela Sachs, Melanie Zlobec, Inti Cathomas, Gieri Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this study, we present a simple but comprehensive molecular analysis of gastric carcinoma. The two major existing classification schemes show some discrepancies and are highly technically demanding, which makes them hardly feasible in daily diagnostic routines. Our workflow is based on simple and commercially available technology and provides a potential consensus approach by integrating the two major classification schemes. Furthermore, our approach allows the molecular subtypes to be assigned to different prognostic groups. We are convinced that our approach may help to better understand the molecular mechanisms of this worldwide health burden and that it could pave the way for new therapeutic targets. ABSTRACT: Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is a heterogeneous disease and at least two major studies have recently provided a molecular classification for this tumor: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Asian Cancer Research Group (ARCG). Both classifications quote four molecular subtypes, but these subtypes only partially overlap. In addition, the classifications are based on complex and cost-intensive technologies, which are hardly feasible for everyday practice. Therefore, simplified approaches using immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH) as well as commercially available next generation sequencing (NGS) have been considered for routine use. In the present study, we screened 115 GAC by IHC for p53, MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1) and E-cadherin and performed ISH for Epstein–Barr virus (EBV). In addition, sequencing by NGS for TP53 and tumor associated genes was performed. With this approach, we were able to define five subtypes of GAC: (1) Microsatellite Instable (MSI), (2) EBV-associated, (3) Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT)-like, (4) p53 aberrant tumors surrogating for chromosomal instability and (5) p53 proficient tumors surrogating for genomics stable cancers. Furthermore, by considering lymph node metastasis in the p53 aberrant GAC, a better prognostic stratification was achieved which finally allowed us to separate the GAC highly significant in a group with poor and good-to-intermediate prognosis, respectively. Our data show that molecular classification of GAC can be achieved by using commercially available assays including IHC, ISH and NGS. Furthermore, we present an integrative workflow, which has the potential to overcome the uncertainty resulting from discrepancies from existing classification schemes. MDPI 2021-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8345215/ /pubmed/34359622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153722 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Daun, Till
Nienhold, Ronny
Paasinen-Sohns, Aino
Frank, Angela
Sachs, Melanie
Zlobec, Inti
Cathomas, Gieri
Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach
title Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach
title_full Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach
title_fullStr Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach
title_full_unstemmed Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach
title_short Combined Simplified Molecular Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma, Enhanced by Lymph Node Status: An Integrative Approach
title_sort combined simplified molecular classification of gastric adenocarcinoma, enhanced by lymph node status: an integrative approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153722
work_keys_str_mv AT dauntill combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach
AT nienholdronny combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach
AT paasinensohnsaino combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach
AT frankangela combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach
AT sachsmelanie combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach
AT zlobecinti combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach
AT cathomasgieri combinedsimplifiedmolecularclassificationofgastricadenocarcinomaenhancedbylymphnodestatusanintegrativeapproach