Cargando…

Identification of Failure Origin Through Testing and the Weibull Risk-of-Rupture

The stress distribution in bond layers of two different thicknesses (50 μm and 200 μm) was calculated by finite element analysis for pairs of rectangular cross section metal bars bonded to each other and subjected to four point bending. These stresses were used to aid in identification of the failur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tesk, John A., Chiang, Martin Y. M., Keeny, Spurgeon M., Tang, Jun, Sato, Yuuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405302
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.099.048
_version_ 1783734591335432192
author Tesk, John A.
Chiang, Martin Y. M.
Keeny, Spurgeon M.
Tang, Jun
Sato, Yuuji
author_facet Tesk, John A.
Chiang, Martin Y. M.
Keeny, Spurgeon M.
Tang, Jun
Sato, Yuuji
author_sort Tesk, John A.
collection PubMed
description The stress distribution in bond layers of two different thicknesses (50 μm and 200 μm) was calculated by finite element analysis for pairs of rectangular cross section metal bars bonded to each other and subjected to four point bending. These stresses were used to aid in identification of the failure origin by use of the Weibull risk-of-rupture (RR) function. By use of the stress distributions, the characteristic strength from 50 μm bond test specimens could be correlated with that for 200 μm bond test specimens when the failure was assumed to have an interfacial origin. The finite element meshes were refined twice and the ratios of characteristic strengths were recalculated and remained virtually unchanged by each of the mesh refinements. Hence, the identification of the interface as the failure origin remained consistent. Further, the use of stresses extrapolated to zero mesh size also produced the same ratios. Therefore, the RR calculations do not appear to be sensitive to the mesh sizes used for the stress calculations when the meshes are comparable or when changed in a comparable manner. The results show this method can be consistent and a useful adjunct for identification of failure origins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8345284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1994
publisher [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83452842023-07-03 Identification of Failure Origin Through Testing and the Weibull Risk-of-Rupture Tesk, John A. Chiang, Martin Y. M. Keeny, Spurgeon M. Tang, Jun Sato, Yuuji J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol Article The stress distribution in bond layers of two different thicknesses (50 μm and 200 μm) was calculated by finite element analysis for pairs of rectangular cross section metal bars bonded to each other and subjected to four point bending. These stresses were used to aid in identification of the failure origin by use of the Weibull risk-of-rupture (RR) function. By use of the stress distributions, the characteristic strength from 50 μm bond test specimens could be correlated with that for 200 μm bond test specimens when the failure was assumed to have an interfacial origin. The finite element meshes were refined twice and the ratios of characteristic strengths were recalculated and remained virtually unchanged by each of the mesh refinements. Hence, the identification of the interface as the failure origin remained consistent. Further, the use of stresses extrapolated to zero mesh size also produced the same ratios. Therefore, the RR calculations do not appear to be sensitive to the mesh sizes used for the stress calculations when the meshes are comparable or when changed in a comparable manner. The results show this method can be consistent and a useful adjunct for identification of failure origins. [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 1994 /pmc/articles/PMC8345284/ /pubmed/37405302 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.099.048 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is a publication of the U.S. Government. The papers are in the public domain and are not subject to copyright in the United States. Articles from J Res may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Article
Tesk, John A.
Chiang, Martin Y. M.
Keeny, Spurgeon M.
Tang, Jun
Sato, Yuuji
Identification of Failure Origin Through Testing and the Weibull Risk-of-Rupture
title Identification of Failure Origin Through Testing and the Weibull Risk-of-Rupture
title_full Identification of Failure Origin Through Testing and the Weibull Risk-of-Rupture
title_fullStr Identification of Failure Origin Through Testing and the Weibull Risk-of-Rupture
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Failure Origin Through Testing and the Weibull Risk-of-Rupture
title_short Identification of Failure Origin Through Testing and the Weibull Risk-of-Rupture
title_sort identification of failure origin through testing and the weibull risk-of-rupture
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405302
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.099.048
work_keys_str_mv AT teskjohna identificationoffailureoriginthroughtestingandtheweibullriskofrupture
AT chiangmartinym identificationoffailureoriginthroughtestingandtheweibullriskofrupture
AT keenyspurgeonm identificationoffailureoriginthroughtestingandtheweibullriskofrupture
AT tangjun identificationoffailureoriginthroughtestingandtheweibullriskofrupture
AT satoyuuji identificationoffailureoriginthroughtestingandtheweibullriskofrupture