Cargando…
Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review
Background and aim: Over the last decades, the incidence of melanoma has been steadily growing, with 4.2% of the population worldwide affected by cutaneous melanoma (CM) in 2020 and with a higher incidence and mortality in men than in women. We investigated both the risk factors for CM development a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34360236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157945 |
_version_ | 1783734638292762624 |
---|---|
author | D’Ecclesiis, Oriana Caini, Saverio Martinoli, Chiara Raimondi, Sara Gaiaschi, Camilla Tosti, Giulio Queirolo, Paola Veneri, Camilla Saieva, Calogero Gandini, Sara Chiocca, Susanna |
author_facet | D’Ecclesiis, Oriana Caini, Saverio Martinoli, Chiara Raimondi, Sara Gaiaschi, Camilla Tosti, Giulio Queirolo, Paola Veneri, Camilla Saieva, Calogero Gandini, Sara Chiocca, Susanna |
author_sort | D’Ecclesiis, Oriana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and aim: Over the last decades, the incidence of melanoma has been steadily growing, with 4.2% of the population worldwide affected by cutaneous melanoma (CM) in 2020 and with a higher incidence and mortality in men than in women. We investigated both the risk factors for CM development and the prognostic and predictive factors for survival, stratifying for both sex and gender. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies indexed in PUB-MED, EMBASE, and Scopus until 4 February 2021. We included reviews, meta-analyses, and pooled analyses investigating differences between women and men in CM risk factors and in prognostic and predictive factors for CM survival. Data synthesis: Twenty-four studies were included, and relevant data extracted. Of these, 13 studies concerned potential risk factors, six concerned predictive factors, and five addressed prognostic factors of melanoma. Discussion: The systematic review revealed no significant differences in genetic predisposition to CM between males and females, while there appear to be several gender disparities regarding CM risk factors, partly attributable to different lifestyles and behavioral habits between men and women. There is currently no clear evidence of whether the mutational landscapes of CM differ by sex/gender. Prognosis is justified by a complex combination of phenotypes and immune functions, while reported differences between genders in predicting the effectiveness of new treatments are inconsistent. Overall, the results emerging from the literature reveal the importance of considering the sex/gender variable in all studies and pave the way for including it towards precision medicine. Conclusions: Men and women differ genetically, biologically, and by social construct. Our systematic review shows that, although fundamental, the variable sex/gender is not among the ones collected and analyzed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8345480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83454802021-08-07 Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review D’Ecclesiis, Oriana Caini, Saverio Martinoli, Chiara Raimondi, Sara Gaiaschi, Camilla Tosti, Giulio Queirolo, Paola Veneri, Camilla Saieva, Calogero Gandini, Sara Chiocca, Susanna Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Background and aim: Over the last decades, the incidence of melanoma has been steadily growing, with 4.2% of the population worldwide affected by cutaneous melanoma (CM) in 2020 and with a higher incidence and mortality in men than in women. We investigated both the risk factors for CM development and the prognostic and predictive factors for survival, stratifying for both sex and gender. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies indexed in PUB-MED, EMBASE, and Scopus until 4 February 2021. We included reviews, meta-analyses, and pooled analyses investigating differences between women and men in CM risk factors and in prognostic and predictive factors for CM survival. Data synthesis: Twenty-four studies were included, and relevant data extracted. Of these, 13 studies concerned potential risk factors, six concerned predictive factors, and five addressed prognostic factors of melanoma. Discussion: The systematic review revealed no significant differences in genetic predisposition to CM between males and females, while there appear to be several gender disparities regarding CM risk factors, partly attributable to different lifestyles and behavioral habits between men and women. There is currently no clear evidence of whether the mutational landscapes of CM differ by sex/gender. Prognosis is justified by a complex combination of phenotypes and immune functions, while reported differences between genders in predicting the effectiveness of new treatments are inconsistent. Overall, the results emerging from the literature reveal the importance of considering the sex/gender variable in all studies and pave the way for including it towards precision medicine. Conclusions: Men and women differ genetically, biologically, and by social construct. Our systematic review shows that, although fundamental, the variable sex/gender is not among the ones collected and analyzed. MDPI 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8345480/ /pubmed/34360236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157945 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review D’Ecclesiis, Oriana Caini, Saverio Martinoli, Chiara Raimondi, Sara Gaiaschi, Camilla Tosti, Giulio Queirolo, Paola Veneri, Camilla Saieva, Calogero Gandini, Sara Chiocca, Susanna Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review |
title | Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | gender-dependent specificities in cutaneous melanoma predisposition, risk factors, somatic mutations, prognostic and predictive factors: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34360236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157945 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decclesiisoriana genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview AT cainisaverio genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview AT martinolichiara genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview AT raimondisara genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview AT gaiaschicamilla genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview AT tostigiulio genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview AT queirolopaola genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview AT venericamilla genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview AT saievacalogero genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview AT gandinisara genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview AT chioccasusanna genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview |