Cargando…

Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review

Background and aim: Over the last decades, the incidence of melanoma has been steadily growing, with 4.2% of the population worldwide affected by cutaneous melanoma (CM) in 2020 and with a higher incidence and mortality in men than in women. We investigated both the risk factors for CM development a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Ecclesiis, Oriana, Caini, Saverio, Martinoli, Chiara, Raimondi, Sara, Gaiaschi, Camilla, Tosti, Giulio, Queirolo, Paola, Veneri, Camilla, Saieva, Calogero, Gandini, Sara, Chiocca, Susanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34360236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157945
_version_ 1783734638292762624
author D’Ecclesiis, Oriana
Caini, Saverio
Martinoli, Chiara
Raimondi, Sara
Gaiaschi, Camilla
Tosti, Giulio
Queirolo, Paola
Veneri, Camilla
Saieva, Calogero
Gandini, Sara
Chiocca, Susanna
author_facet D’Ecclesiis, Oriana
Caini, Saverio
Martinoli, Chiara
Raimondi, Sara
Gaiaschi, Camilla
Tosti, Giulio
Queirolo, Paola
Veneri, Camilla
Saieva, Calogero
Gandini, Sara
Chiocca, Susanna
author_sort D’Ecclesiis, Oriana
collection PubMed
description Background and aim: Over the last decades, the incidence of melanoma has been steadily growing, with 4.2% of the population worldwide affected by cutaneous melanoma (CM) in 2020 and with a higher incidence and mortality in men than in women. We investigated both the risk factors for CM development and the prognostic and predictive factors for survival, stratifying for both sex and gender. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies indexed in PUB-MED, EMBASE, and Scopus until 4 February 2021. We included reviews, meta-analyses, and pooled analyses investigating differences between women and men in CM risk factors and in prognostic and predictive factors for CM survival. Data synthesis: Twenty-four studies were included, and relevant data extracted. Of these, 13 studies concerned potential risk factors, six concerned predictive factors, and five addressed prognostic factors of melanoma. Discussion: The systematic review revealed no significant differences in genetic predisposition to CM between males and females, while there appear to be several gender disparities regarding CM risk factors, partly attributable to different lifestyles and behavioral habits between men and women. There is currently no clear evidence of whether the mutational landscapes of CM differ by sex/gender. Prognosis is justified by a complex combination of phenotypes and immune functions, while reported differences between genders in predicting the effectiveness of new treatments are inconsistent. Overall, the results emerging from the literature reveal the importance of considering the sex/gender variable in all studies and pave the way for including it towards precision medicine. Conclusions: Men and women differ genetically, biologically, and by social construct. Our systematic review shows that, although fundamental, the variable sex/gender is not among the ones collected and analyzed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8345480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83454802021-08-07 Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review D’Ecclesiis, Oriana Caini, Saverio Martinoli, Chiara Raimondi, Sara Gaiaschi, Camilla Tosti, Giulio Queirolo, Paola Veneri, Camilla Saieva, Calogero Gandini, Sara Chiocca, Susanna Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Background and aim: Over the last decades, the incidence of melanoma has been steadily growing, with 4.2% of the population worldwide affected by cutaneous melanoma (CM) in 2020 and with a higher incidence and mortality in men than in women. We investigated both the risk factors for CM development and the prognostic and predictive factors for survival, stratifying for both sex and gender. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies indexed in PUB-MED, EMBASE, and Scopus until 4 February 2021. We included reviews, meta-analyses, and pooled analyses investigating differences between women and men in CM risk factors and in prognostic and predictive factors for CM survival. Data synthesis: Twenty-four studies were included, and relevant data extracted. Of these, 13 studies concerned potential risk factors, six concerned predictive factors, and five addressed prognostic factors of melanoma. Discussion: The systematic review revealed no significant differences in genetic predisposition to CM between males and females, while there appear to be several gender disparities regarding CM risk factors, partly attributable to different lifestyles and behavioral habits between men and women. There is currently no clear evidence of whether the mutational landscapes of CM differ by sex/gender. Prognosis is justified by a complex combination of phenotypes and immune functions, while reported differences between genders in predicting the effectiveness of new treatments are inconsistent. Overall, the results emerging from the literature reveal the importance of considering the sex/gender variable in all studies and pave the way for including it towards precision medicine. Conclusions: Men and women differ genetically, biologically, and by social construct. Our systematic review shows that, although fundamental, the variable sex/gender is not among the ones collected and analyzed. MDPI 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8345480/ /pubmed/34360236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157945 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
D’Ecclesiis, Oriana
Caini, Saverio
Martinoli, Chiara
Raimondi, Sara
Gaiaschi, Camilla
Tosti, Giulio
Queirolo, Paola
Veneri, Camilla
Saieva, Calogero
Gandini, Sara
Chiocca, Susanna
Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review
title Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review
title_full Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review
title_short Gender-Dependent Specificities in Cutaneous Melanoma Predisposition, Risk Factors, Somatic Mutations, Prognostic and Predictive Factors: A Systematic Review
title_sort gender-dependent specificities in cutaneous melanoma predisposition, risk factors, somatic mutations, prognostic and predictive factors: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34360236
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157945
work_keys_str_mv AT decclesiisoriana genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview
AT cainisaverio genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview
AT martinolichiara genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview
AT raimondisara genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview
AT gaiaschicamilla genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview
AT tostigiulio genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview
AT queirolopaola genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview
AT venericamilla genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview
AT saievacalogero genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview
AT gandinisara genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview
AT chioccasusanna genderdependentspecificitiesincutaneousmelanomapredispositionriskfactorssomaticmutationsprognosticandpredictivefactorsasystematicreview