Cargando…
Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review
This report surveyed the image reject rates of intra-oral, extra-oral, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in the academic literature. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were queried in mid-April 2021. Manual screening of the reference lists of the identified publications was...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34360368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158076 |
_version_ | 1783734674036621312 |
---|---|
author | Yeung, Andy Wai Kan Wong, Natalie Sui Miu |
author_facet | Yeung, Andy Wai Kan Wong, Natalie Sui Miu |
author_sort | Yeung, Andy Wai Kan |
collection | PubMed |
description | This report surveyed the image reject rates of intra-oral, extra-oral, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in the academic literature. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were queried in mid-April 2021. Manual screening of the reference lists of the identified publications was performed to identify papers missed from the database search. All publications returned by the searches were initially included. Exclusion criteria included irrelevance, no reporting of reject rate, no access to the article, and not original article. The total number of images and the number of rejects were recorded for each type of radiographic images. Factors and commonest errors associated with the rejects were recorded. Twenty-six original articles were identified and reviewed. The average reject rate was 11.25% for bitewings, 16.38% for periapicals, 4.10% for panoramics, 6.08% for lateral cephalography, and 2.77% for CBCT. Positioning error and patient movement were two common reasons for the rejects. The average reject rates computed from data pooled across studies should form the reference values for quality assurance programs to follow. Future reject analysis studies should report more radiographic parameters such as type of collimation for intra-oral radiography and patient posture for CBCT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8345626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83456262021-08-07 Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review Yeung, Andy Wai Kan Wong, Natalie Sui Miu Int J Environ Res Public Health Review This report surveyed the image reject rates of intra-oral, extra-oral, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in the academic literature. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were queried in mid-April 2021. Manual screening of the reference lists of the identified publications was performed to identify papers missed from the database search. All publications returned by the searches were initially included. Exclusion criteria included irrelevance, no reporting of reject rate, no access to the article, and not original article. The total number of images and the number of rejects were recorded for each type of radiographic images. Factors and commonest errors associated with the rejects were recorded. Twenty-six original articles were identified and reviewed. The average reject rate was 11.25% for bitewings, 16.38% for periapicals, 4.10% for panoramics, 6.08% for lateral cephalography, and 2.77% for CBCT. Positioning error and patient movement were two common reasons for the rejects. The average reject rates computed from data pooled across studies should form the reference values for quality assurance programs to follow. Future reject analysis studies should report more radiographic parameters such as type of collimation for intra-oral radiography and patient posture for CBCT. MDPI 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8345626/ /pubmed/34360368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158076 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Yeung, Andy Wai Kan Wong, Natalie Sui Miu Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review |
title | Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review |
title_full | Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review |
title_short | Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review |
title_sort | reject rates of radiographic images in dentomaxillofacial radiology: a literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34360368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeungandywaikan rejectratesofradiographicimagesindentomaxillofacialradiologyaliteraturereview AT wongnataliesuimiu rejectratesofradiographicimagesindentomaxillofacialradiologyaliteraturereview |