Cargando…

A Bibliometric Analysis of 14,822 Researches on Myocardial Reperfusion Injury by Machine Learning

Myocardial ischemia is the major cause of death worldwide, and reperfusion is the standard intervention for myocardial ischemia. However, reperfusion may cause additional damage, known as myocardial reperfusion injury, for which there is still no effective therapy. This study aims to analyze the lan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Chan, Liu, Zhaoya, Shi, Ruizheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34360526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158231
_version_ 1783734759803846656
author Li, Chan
Liu, Zhaoya
Shi, Ruizheng
author_facet Li, Chan
Liu, Zhaoya
Shi, Ruizheng
author_sort Li, Chan
collection PubMed
description Myocardial ischemia is the major cause of death worldwide, and reperfusion is the standard intervention for myocardial ischemia. However, reperfusion may cause additional damage, known as myocardial reperfusion injury, for which there is still no effective therapy. This study aims to analyze the landscape of researches concerning myocardial reperfusion injury over the past three decades by machine learning. PubMed was searched for publications from 1990 to 2020 indexed under the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term “myocardial reperfusion injury” on 13 April 2021. MeSH analysis and Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) analyses were applied to reveal research hotspots. In total, 14,822 publications were collected and analyzed in this study. MeSH analyses revealed that time factors and apoptosis were the leading terms of the pathogenesis and treatment of myocardial reperfusion injury, respectively. In LDA analyses, research topics were classified into three clusters. Complex correlations were observed between topics of different clusters, and the prognosis is the most concerned field of the researchers. In conclusion, the number of publications on myocardial reperfusion injury increases during the past three decades, which mainly focused on prognosis, mechanism, and treatment. Prognosis is the most concerned field, whereas studies on mechanism and treatment are relatively lacking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8345983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83459832021-08-07 A Bibliometric Analysis of 14,822 Researches on Myocardial Reperfusion Injury by Machine Learning Li, Chan Liu, Zhaoya Shi, Ruizheng Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Myocardial ischemia is the major cause of death worldwide, and reperfusion is the standard intervention for myocardial ischemia. However, reperfusion may cause additional damage, known as myocardial reperfusion injury, for which there is still no effective therapy. This study aims to analyze the landscape of researches concerning myocardial reperfusion injury over the past three decades by machine learning. PubMed was searched for publications from 1990 to 2020 indexed under the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term “myocardial reperfusion injury” on 13 April 2021. MeSH analysis and Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) analyses were applied to reveal research hotspots. In total, 14,822 publications were collected and analyzed in this study. MeSH analyses revealed that time factors and apoptosis were the leading terms of the pathogenesis and treatment of myocardial reperfusion injury, respectively. In LDA analyses, research topics were classified into three clusters. Complex correlations were observed between topics of different clusters, and the prognosis is the most concerned field of the researchers. In conclusion, the number of publications on myocardial reperfusion injury increases during the past three decades, which mainly focused on prognosis, mechanism, and treatment. Prognosis is the most concerned field, whereas studies on mechanism and treatment are relatively lacking. MDPI 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8345983/ /pubmed/34360526 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158231 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Chan
Liu, Zhaoya
Shi, Ruizheng
A Bibliometric Analysis of 14,822 Researches on Myocardial Reperfusion Injury by Machine Learning
title A Bibliometric Analysis of 14,822 Researches on Myocardial Reperfusion Injury by Machine Learning
title_full A Bibliometric Analysis of 14,822 Researches on Myocardial Reperfusion Injury by Machine Learning
title_fullStr A Bibliometric Analysis of 14,822 Researches on Myocardial Reperfusion Injury by Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed A Bibliometric Analysis of 14,822 Researches on Myocardial Reperfusion Injury by Machine Learning
title_short A Bibliometric Analysis of 14,822 Researches on Myocardial Reperfusion Injury by Machine Learning
title_sort bibliometric analysis of 14,822 researches on myocardial reperfusion injury by machine learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34360526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158231
work_keys_str_mv AT lichan abibliometricanalysisof14822researchesonmyocardialreperfusioninjurybymachinelearning
AT liuzhaoya abibliometricanalysisof14822researchesonmyocardialreperfusioninjurybymachinelearning
AT shiruizheng abibliometricanalysisof14822researchesonmyocardialreperfusioninjurybymachinelearning
AT lichan bibliometricanalysisof14822researchesonmyocardialreperfusioninjurybymachinelearning
AT liuzhaoya bibliometricanalysisof14822researchesonmyocardialreperfusioninjurybymachinelearning
AT shiruizheng bibliometricanalysisof14822researchesonmyocardialreperfusioninjurybymachinelearning