Cargando…

Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis

PURPOSE: To define the best possible outcomes for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection (RLAR) using total mesorectal excision (TME) in low-morbid patients, performed by expert robotic surgeons in German robotic centers. The benchmark values were derived from these results. METHODS: The dat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Egberts, Jan-Hendrik, Kersebaum, Jan-Niclas, Mann, Benno, Aselmann, Heiko, Hirschburger, Markus, Graß, Julia, Becker, Thomas, Izbicki, Jakob, Perez, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8346389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03988-6
_version_ 1783734859604164608
author Egberts, Jan-Hendrik
Kersebaum, Jan-Niclas
Mann, Benno
Aselmann, Heiko
Hirschburger, Markus
Graß, Julia
Becker, Thomas
Izbicki, Jakob
Perez, Daniel
author_facet Egberts, Jan-Hendrik
Kersebaum, Jan-Niclas
Mann, Benno
Aselmann, Heiko
Hirschburger, Markus
Graß, Julia
Becker, Thomas
Izbicki, Jakob
Perez, Daniel
author_sort Egberts, Jan-Hendrik
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To define the best possible outcomes for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection (RLAR) using total mesorectal excision (TME) in low-morbid patients, performed by expert robotic surgeons in German robotic centers. The benchmark values were derived from these results. METHODS: The data was retrospectively collected from five German expert centers. After patient exclusion (prior surgery, extended surgery, no prior anastomosis, hand-sewn anastomosis), the benchmark cohort was defined (n = 226). The median with interquartile range was first calculated for the individual centers. The 75th percentile of the median results was defined as the benchmark cutoff and represents the “perfect” achievable outcome. This applied to all benchmark values apart from lymph node yield, where the cutoff was defined as the 25th percentile (more lymph nodes are better). RESULTS: The benchmark values for conversion and intraoperative complication rates were ≤ 4.0% and ≤ 1.4%, respectively. For postoperative complications, the benchmark was ≤ 28% for “any” and ≤ 18.0% for major complications. The R0 and complete TME rate benchmarks were both 100%, with a lymph node yield of > 18. The benchmark for rate of anastomotic insufficiency was < 12.5% and 90-day mortality was 0%. Readmission rates should not exceed 4%. CONCLUSION: This outcome analysis of patients with low comorbidity undergoing RLAR may serve as a reference to evaluate surgical performance in robotic rectum resection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8346389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83463892021-08-20 Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis Egberts, Jan-Hendrik Kersebaum, Jan-Niclas Mann, Benno Aselmann, Heiko Hirschburger, Markus Graß, Julia Becker, Thomas Izbicki, Jakob Perez, Daniel Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article PURPOSE: To define the best possible outcomes for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection (RLAR) using total mesorectal excision (TME) in low-morbid patients, performed by expert robotic surgeons in German robotic centers. The benchmark values were derived from these results. METHODS: The data was retrospectively collected from five German expert centers. After patient exclusion (prior surgery, extended surgery, no prior anastomosis, hand-sewn anastomosis), the benchmark cohort was defined (n = 226). The median with interquartile range was first calculated for the individual centers. The 75th percentile of the median results was defined as the benchmark cutoff and represents the “perfect” achievable outcome. This applied to all benchmark values apart from lymph node yield, where the cutoff was defined as the 25th percentile (more lymph nodes are better). RESULTS: The benchmark values for conversion and intraoperative complication rates were ≤ 4.0% and ≤ 1.4%, respectively. For postoperative complications, the benchmark was ≤ 28% for “any” and ≤ 18.0% for major complications. The R0 and complete TME rate benchmarks were both 100%, with a lymph node yield of > 18. The benchmark for rate of anastomotic insufficiency was < 12.5% and 90-day mortality was 0%. Readmission rates should not exceed 4%. CONCLUSION: This outcome analysis of patients with low comorbidity undergoing RLAR may serve as a reference to evaluate surgical performance in robotic rectum resection. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8346389/ /pubmed/34244856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03988-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Egberts, Jan-Hendrik
Kersebaum, Jan-Niclas
Mann, Benno
Aselmann, Heiko
Hirschburger, Markus
Graß, Julia
Becker, Thomas
Izbicki, Jakob
Perez, Daniel
Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis
title Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis
title_full Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis
title_fullStr Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis
title_full_unstemmed Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis
title_short Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis
title_sort defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8346389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03988-6
work_keys_str_mv AT egbertsjanhendrik definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis
AT kersebaumjanniclas definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis
AT mannbenno definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis
AT aselmannheiko definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis
AT hirschburgermarkus definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis
AT graßjulia definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis
AT beckerthomas definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis
AT izbickijakob definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis
AT perezdaniel definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis