Cargando…
Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis
PURPOSE: To define the best possible outcomes for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection (RLAR) using total mesorectal excision (TME) in low-morbid patients, performed by expert robotic surgeons in German robotic centers. The benchmark values were derived from these results. METHODS: The dat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8346389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03988-6 |
_version_ | 1783734859604164608 |
---|---|
author | Egberts, Jan-Hendrik Kersebaum, Jan-Niclas Mann, Benno Aselmann, Heiko Hirschburger, Markus Graß, Julia Becker, Thomas Izbicki, Jakob Perez, Daniel |
author_facet | Egberts, Jan-Hendrik Kersebaum, Jan-Niclas Mann, Benno Aselmann, Heiko Hirschburger, Markus Graß, Julia Becker, Thomas Izbicki, Jakob Perez, Daniel |
author_sort | Egberts, Jan-Hendrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To define the best possible outcomes for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection (RLAR) using total mesorectal excision (TME) in low-morbid patients, performed by expert robotic surgeons in German robotic centers. The benchmark values were derived from these results. METHODS: The data was retrospectively collected from five German expert centers. After patient exclusion (prior surgery, extended surgery, no prior anastomosis, hand-sewn anastomosis), the benchmark cohort was defined (n = 226). The median with interquartile range was first calculated for the individual centers. The 75th percentile of the median results was defined as the benchmark cutoff and represents the “perfect” achievable outcome. This applied to all benchmark values apart from lymph node yield, where the cutoff was defined as the 25th percentile (more lymph nodes are better). RESULTS: The benchmark values for conversion and intraoperative complication rates were ≤ 4.0% and ≤ 1.4%, respectively. For postoperative complications, the benchmark was ≤ 28% for “any” and ≤ 18.0% for major complications. The R0 and complete TME rate benchmarks were both 100%, with a lymph node yield of > 18. The benchmark for rate of anastomotic insufficiency was < 12.5% and 90-day mortality was 0%. Readmission rates should not exceed 4%. CONCLUSION: This outcome analysis of patients with low comorbidity undergoing RLAR may serve as a reference to evaluate surgical performance in robotic rectum resection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8346389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83463892021-08-20 Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis Egberts, Jan-Hendrik Kersebaum, Jan-Niclas Mann, Benno Aselmann, Heiko Hirschburger, Markus Graß, Julia Becker, Thomas Izbicki, Jakob Perez, Daniel Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article PURPOSE: To define the best possible outcomes for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection (RLAR) using total mesorectal excision (TME) in low-morbid patients, performed by expert robotic surgeons in German robotic centers. The benchmark values were derived from these results. METHODS: The data was retrospectively collected from five German expert centers. After patient exclusion (prior surgery, extended surgery, no prior anastomosis, hand-sewn anastomosis), the benchmark cohort was defined (n = 226). The median with interquartile range was first calculated for the individual centers. The 75th percentile of the median results was defined as the benchmark cutoff and represents the “perfect” achievable outcome. This applied to all benchmark values apart from lymph node yield, where the cutoff was defined as the 25th percentile (more lymph nodes are better). RESULTS: The benchmark values for conversion and intraoperative complication rates were ≤ 4.0% and ≤ 1.4%, respectively. For postoperative complications, the benchmark was ≤ 28% for “any” and ≤ 18.0% for major complications. The R0 and complete TME rate benchmarks were both 100%, with a lymph node yield of > 18. The benchmark for rate of anastomotic insufficiency was < 12.5% and 90-day mortality was 0%. Readmission rates should not exceed 4%. CONCLUSION: This outcome analysis of patients with low comorbidity undergoing RLAR may serve as a reference to evaluate surgical performance in robotic rectum resection. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8346389/ /pubmed/34244856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03988-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Egberts, Jan-Hendrik Kersebaum, Jan-Niclas Mann, Benno Aselmann, Heiko Hirschburger, Markus Graß, Julia Becker, Thomas Izbicki, Jakob Perez, Daniel Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis |
title | Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis |
title_full | Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis |
title_fullStr | Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis |
title_short | Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis |
title_sort | defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8346389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03988-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT egbertsjanhendrik definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis AT kersebaumjanniclas definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis AT mannbenno definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis AT aselmannheiko definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis AT hirschburgermarkus definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis AT graßjulia definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis AT beckerthomas definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis AT izbickijakob definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis AT perezdaniel definingbenchmarksforroboticassistedlowanteriorrectumresectioninlowmorbidpatientsamulticenteranalysis |