Cargando…

Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE: Functional results after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are generally good. However, some patients suffer from high stool frequency or fecal incontinence. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) may represent a therapeutic alternative in these patients, but little is known a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seifarth, C., Slavova, N., Degro, C., Lehmann, K. S., Kreis, M. E., Weixler, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8346414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34160664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03981-z
_version_ 1783734865057808384
author Seifarth, C.
Slavova, N.
Degro, C.
Lehmann, K. S.
Kreis, M. E.
Weixler, B.
author_facet Seifarth, C.
Slavova, N.
Degro, C.
Lehmann, K. S.
Kreis, M. E.
Weixler, B.
author_sort Seifarth, C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Functional results after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are generally good. However, some patients suffer from high stool frequency or fecal incontinence. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) may represent a therapeutic alternative in these patients, but little is known about indication and results. The aim of this study was to evaluate incontinence after IPAA and demonstrate SNS feasibility in these patients. METHODS: This retrospective study includes patients who received a SNS between 1993 and 2020 for increased stool frequency or fecal incontinence after proctocolectomy with IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Proctocolectomy was performed in a two- or three-step approach with ileostomy closure as the last step. Demographic, follow-up data and functional results were obtained from the hospital database. RESULTS: SNS was performed in 23 patients. Median follow-up time after SNS was 6.5 years (min. 4.2–max. 8.8). Two patients were lost to follow-up. The median time from ileostomy closure to SNS implantation was 6 years (min. 0.5–max. 14.5). Continence after SNS improved in 16 patients (69%) with a median St. Marks score for anal incontinence of 19 (min. 4–max. 22) before SNS compared to 4 (0–10) after SNS placement (p = 0.012). In seven patients, SNS therapy was not successful. CONCLUSION: SNS implantation improves symptoms in over two-thirds of patients suffering from high stool frequency or fecal incontinence after proctocolectomy with IPAA. Awareness of the beneficial effects of SNS should be increased in physicians involved in the management of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8346414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83464142021-08-20 Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Seifarth, C. Slavova, N. Degro, C. Lehmann, K. S. Kreis, M. E. Weixler, B. Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article PURPOSE: Functional results after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are generally good. However, some patients suffer from high stool frequency or fecal incontinence. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) may represent a therapeutic alternative in these patients, but little is known about indication and results. The aim of this study was to evaluate incontinence after IPAA and demonstrate SNS feasibility in these patients. METHODS: This retrospective study includes patients who received a SNS between 1993 and 2020 for increased stool frequency or fecal incontinence after proctocolectomy with IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Proctocolectomy was performed in a two- or three-step approach with ileostomy closure as the last step. Demographic, follow-up data and functional results were obtained from the hospital database. RESULTS: SNS was performed in 23 patients. Median follow-up time after SNS was 6.5 years (min. 4.2–max. 8.8). Two patients were lost to follow-up. The median time from ileostomy closure to SNS implantation was 6 years (min. 0.5–max. 14.5). Continence after SNS improved in 16 patients (69%) with a median St. Marks score for anal incontinence of 19 (min. 4–max. 22) before SNS compared to 4 (0–10) after SNS placement (p = 0.012). In seven patients, SNS therapy was not successful. CONCLUSION: SNS implantation improves symptoms in over two-thirds of patients suffering from high stool frequency or fecal incontinence after proctocolectomy with IPAA. Awareness of the beneficial effects of SNS should be increased in physicians involved in the management of these patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8346414/ /pubmed/34160664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03981-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Seifarth, C.
Slavova, N.
Degro, C.
Lehmann, K. S.
Kreis, M. E.
Weixler, B.
Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
title Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
title_full Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
title_fullStr Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
title_full_unstemmed Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
title_short Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
title_sort sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8346414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34160664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03981-z
work_keys_str_mv AT seifarthc sacralnervestimulationinpatientswithilealpouchanalanastomosis
AT slavovan sacralnervestimulationinpatientswithilealpouchanalanastomosis
AT degroc sacralnervestimulationinpatientswithilealpouchanalanastomosis
AT lehmannks sacralnervestimulationinpatientswithilealpouchanalanastomosis
AT kreisme sacralnervestimulationinpatientswithilealpouchanalanastomosis
AT weixlerb sacralnervestimulationinpatientswithilealpouchanalanastomosis