Cargando…
Randomized clinical trial on the use of a colon-occlusion device to assist rectal washout
BACKGROUND: Transrectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery is currently limited by the inherent risk of surgical site infection due to peritoneal contamination after rectotomy. Coloshield has been developed as a temporary colon occlusion device to facilitate rectal washout. However, eff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8346441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32968914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07992-9 |
_version_ | 1783734870158082048 |
---|---|
author | Cordewener, Carolin Zürcher, Manuel Müller, Philip C. Müller-Stich, Beat P. Zerz, Andreas Linke, Georg R. Steinemann, Daniel C. |
author_facet | Cordewener, Carolin Zürcher, Manuel Müller, Philip C. Müller-Stich, Beat P. Zerz, Andreas Linke, Georg R. Steinemann, Daniel C. |
author_sort | Cordewener, Carolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transrectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery is currently limited by the inherent risk of surgical site infection due to peritoneal contamination after rectotomy. Coloshield has been developed as a temporary colon occlusion device to facilitate rectal washout. However, effectiveness and safety has not been evaluated in humans. METHODS: Twenty-two patients have been randomly assigned to undergo proctological intervention with a rectal washout with and without the use of Coloshield. Patients and assessors were blinded. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) has been determined 30 min as well as immediately after rectal washout. Feasibility, pain, intra- and postoperative morbidity as well as bowel function and continence 6 weeks after surgery were assessed. RESULTS: BBPS 30 min after rectal washout with and without Coloshield was in mean 2.42 ± 1.02 and 2.12 ± 0.89 (p = 0.042). Mean BBPS immediately after rectal washout was 2.39 ± 1.02 and 2.24 ± 0.66 (p = 0.269). Mean BBPS immediately after rectal washout and 30 min thereafter did not differ (p = 0.711). Coloshield application was feasible without any complications. The median (interquartile range) numeric rating scale for pain 4 h after surgery was 1 (0–1) and 3 (0–4) (p = 0.212). Six weeks after surgery 0/11 and 1/11 patients suffered from evacuation difficulties (p = 1.0) and the median Vaizey–Wexner score was 1 (0–3) and 1 (0–2) (p = 0.360). CONCLUSIONS: Coloshield application in humans is feasible and safe. Slight benefits in rectal preparation by washout are found when Coloshield is used. Colon occlusion by Coloshield for transrectal NOTES should be evaluated within clinical studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02579330 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8346441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83464412021-08-20 Randomized clinical trial on the use of a colon-occlusion device to assist rectal washout Cordewener, Carolin Zürcher, Manuel Müller, Philip C. Müller-Stich, Beat P. Zerz, Andreas Linke, Georg R. Steinemann, Daniel C. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Transrectal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery is currently limited by the inherent risk of surgical site infection due to peritoneal contamination after rectotomy. Coloshield has been developed as a temporary colon occlusion device to facilitate rectal washout. However, effectiveness and safety has not been evaluated in humans. METHODS: Twenty-two patients have been randomly assigned to undergo proctological intervention with a rectal washout with and without the use of Coloshield. Patients and assessors were blinded. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) has been determined 30 min as well as immediately after rectal washout. Feasibility, pain, intra- and postoperative morbidity as well as bowel function and continence 6 weeks after surgery were assessed. RESULTS: BBPS 30 min after rectal washout with and without Coloshield was in mean 2.42 ± 1.02 and 2.12 ± 0.89 (p = 0.042). Mean BBPS immediately after rectal washout was 2.39 ± 1.02 and 2.24 ± 0.66 (p = 0.269). Mean BBPS immediately after rectal washout and 30 min thereafter did not differ (p = 0.711). Coloshield application was feasible without any complications. The median (interquartile range) numeric rating scale for pain 4 h after surgery was 1 (0–1) and 3 (0–4) (p = 0.212). Six weeks after surgery 0/11 and 1/11 patients suffered from evacuation difficulties (p = 1.0) and the median Vaizey–Wexner score was 1 (0–3) and 1 (0–2) (p = 0.360). CONCLUSIONS: Coloshield application in humans is feasible and safe. Slight benefits in rectal preparation by washout are found when Coloshield is used. Colon occlusion by Coloshield for transrectal NOTES should be evaluated within clinical studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02579330 Springer US 2020-09-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8346441/ /pubmed/32968914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07992-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Cordewener, Carolin Zürcher, Manuel Müller, Philip C. Müller-Stich, Beat P. Zerz, Andreas Linke, Georg R. Steinemann, Daniel C. Randomized clinical trial on the use of a colon-occlusion device to assist rectal washout |
title | Randomized clinical trial on the use of a colon-occlusion device to assist rectal washout |
title_full | Randomized clinical trial on the use of a colon-occlusion device to assist rectal washout |
title_fullStr | Randomized clinical trial on the use of a colon-occlusion device to assist rectal washout |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized clinical trial on the use of a colon-occlusion device to assist rectal washout |
title_short | Randomized clinical trial on the use of a colon-occlusion device to assist rectal washout |
title_sort | randomized clinical trial on the use of a colon-occlusion device to assist rectal washout |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8346441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32968914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07992-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cordewenercarolin randomizedclinicaltrialontheuseofacolonocclusiondevicetoassistrectalwashout AT zurchermanuel randomizedclinicaltrialontheuseofacolonocclusiondevicetoassistrectalwashout AT mullerphilipc randomizedclinicaltrialontheuseofacolonocclusiondevicetoassistrectalwashout AT mullerstichbeatp randomizedclinicaltrialontheuseofacolonocclusiondevicetoassistrectalwashout AT zerzandreas randomizedclinicaltrialontheuseofacolonocclusiondevicetoassistrectalwashout AT linkegeorgr randomizedclinicaltrialontheuseofacolonocclusiondevicetoassistrectalwashout AT steinemanndanielc randomizedclinicaltrialontheuseofacolonocclusiondevicetoassistrectalwashout |