Cargando…

The effects of different surface contaminators on the shear bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin: an experimental study

Background. Contamination of dentin surface is one of the common problems in restorative dentistry. The aim was to investigate the effects of different surface contaminators on the dentin shear bond strength (SBS) of universal adhesive system (UAS) applied in etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahari, Mahmoud, Savadi Oskoee, Siavash, Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel, Molayi, Nasim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8346715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386177
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.014
_version_ 1783734937938034688
author Bahari, Mahmoud
Savadi Oskoee, Siavash
Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel
Molayi, Nasim
author_facet Bahari, Mahmoud
Savadi Oskoee, Siavash
Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel
Molayi, Nasim
author_sort Bahari, Mahmoud
collection PubMed
description Background. Contamination of dentin surface is one of the common problems in restorative dentistry. The aim was to investigate the effects of different surface contaminators on the dentin shear bond strength (SBS) of universal adhesive system (UAS) applied in etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) strategies. Methods. One hundred forty-four maxillary anterior sound human teeth were divided into six groups based on the types of surface contaminators: no surface contaminator (control) and experimental groups contaminated with blood, saliva, aluminium chloride (ALC), ferric sulphate (FS), and caries disclosing agent (CDA). Then, each group was further subdivided into two, based on the application strategy of UAS (ER and SE). After applying the adhesive according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and bonding cylindrical composite samples, the SBS was measured. The data were analysed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD test and t test (P < 0.05). Results. The SBS in all contaminated groups, except for CDA, was significantly lower in both ER and SE strategies compared to control group (P < 0.05). A comparison between the application strategies revealed that ER and SE were only significantly different in the FS contaminated group (P < 0.05). Conclusion. All tested contaminators, except CDA, significantly decreased SBS of UAS in both ER and SE strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8346715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83467152021-08-11 The effects of different surface contaminators on the shear bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin: an experimental study Bahari, Mahmoud Savadi Oskoee, Siavash Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel Molayi, Nasim J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. Contamination of dentin surface is one of the common problems in restorative dentistry. The aim was to investigate the effects of different surface contaminators on the dentin shear bond strength (SBS) of universal adhesive system (UAS) applied in etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) strategies. Methods. One hundred forty-four maxillary anterior sound human teeth were divided into six groups based on the types of surface contaminators: no surface contaminator (control) and experimental groups contaminated with blood, saliva, aluminium chloride (ALC), ferric sulphate (FS), and caries disclosing agent (CDA). Then, each group was further subdivided into two, based on the application strategy of UAS (ER and SE). After applying the adhesive according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and bonding cylindrical composite samples, the SBS was measured. The data were analysed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD test and t test (P < 0.05). Results. The SBS in all contaminated groups, except for CDA, was significantly lower in both ER and SE strategies compared to control group (P < 0.05). A comparison between the application strategies revealed that ER and SE were only significantly different in the FS contaminated group (P < 0.05). Conclusion. All tested contaminators, except CDA, significantly decreased SBS of UAS in both ER and SE strategies. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2021 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8346715/ /pubmed/34386177 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.014 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bahari, Mahmoud
Savadi Oskoee, Siavash
Ebrahimi Chaharom, Mohammad Esmaeel
Molayi, Nasim
The effects of different surface contaminators on the shear bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin: an experimental study
title The effects of different surface contaminators on the shear bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin: an experimental study
title_full The effects of different surface contaminators on the shear bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin: an experimental study
title_fullStr The effects of different surface contaminators on the shear bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin: an experimental study
title_full_unstemmed The effects of different surface contaminators on the shear bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin: an experimental study
title_short The effects of different surface contaminators on the shear bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin: an experimental study
title_sort effects of different surface contaminators on the shear bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin: an experimental study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8346715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34386177
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.014
work_keys_str_mv AT baharimahmoud theeffectsofdifferentsurfacecontaminatorsontheshearbondstrengthofauniversaladhesivesystemtodentinanexperimentalstudy
AT savadioskoeesiavash theeffectsofdifferentsurfacecontaminatorsontheshearbondstrengthofauniversaladhesivesystemtodentinanexperimentalstudy
AT ebrahimichaharommohammadesmaeel theeffectsofdifferentsurfacecontaminatorsontheshearbondstrengthofauniversaladhesivesystemtodentinanexperimentalstudy
AT molayinasim theeffectsofdifferentsurfacecontaminatorsontheshearbondstrengthofauniversaladhesivesystemtodentinanexperimentalstudy
AT baharimahmoud effectsofdifferentsurfacecontaminatorsontheshearbondstrengthofauniversaladhesivesystemtodentinanexperimentalstudy
AT savadioskoeesiavash effectsofdifferentsurfacecontaminatorsontheshearbondstrengthofauniversaladhesivesystemtodentinanexperimentalstudy
AT ebrahimichaharommohammadesmaeel effectsofdifferentsurfacecontaminatorsontheshearbondstrengthofauniversaladhesivesystemtodentinanexperimentalstudy
AT molayinasim effectsofdifferentsurfacecontaminatorsontheshearbondstrengthofauniversaladhesivesystemtodentinanexperimentalstudy