Cargando…
Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding
The nature of halogen-bond interactions was scrutinized from the perspective of astatine, potentially the strongest halogen-bond donor atom. In addition to its remarkable electronic properties (e.g., its higher aromaticity compared to benzene), C(6)At(6) can be involved as a halogen-bond donor and a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154568 |
_version_ | 1783735091292274688 |
---|---|
author | Sarr, Serigne Pilmé, Julien Montavon, Gilles Le Questel, Jean-Yves Galland, Nicolas |
author_facet | Sarr, Serigne Pilmé, Julien Montavon, Gilles Le Questel, Jean-Yves Galland, Nicolas |
author_sort | Sarr, Serigne |
collection | PubMed |
description | The nature of halogen-bond interactions was scrutinized from the perspective of astatine, potentially the strongest halogen-bond donor atom. In addition to its remarkable electronic properties (e.g., its higher aromaticity compared to benzene), C(6)At(6) can be involved as a halogen-bond donor and acceptor. Two-component relativistic calculations and quantum chemical topology analyses were performed on C(6)At(6) and its complexes as well as on their iodinated analogues for comparative purposes. The relativistic spin–orbit interaction was used as a tool to disclose the bonding patterns and the mechanisms that contribute to halogen-bond interactions. Despite the stronger polarizability of astatine, halogen bonds formed by C(6)At(6) can be comparable or weaker than those of C(6)I(6). This unexpected finding comes from the charge-shift bonding character of the C–At bonds. Because charge-shift bonding is connected to the Pauli repulsion between the bonding σ electrons and the σ lone-pair of astatine, it weakens the astatine electrophilicity at its σ-hole (reducing the charge transfer contribution to halogen bonding). These two antinomic characters, charge-shift bonding and halogen bonding, can result in weaker At-mediated interactions than their iodinated counterparts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8347445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83474452021-08-08 Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding Sarr, Serigne Pilmé, Julien Montavon, Gilles Le Questel, Jean-Yves Galland, Nicolas Molecules Article The nature of halogen-bond interactions was scrutinized from the perspective of astatine, potentially the strongest halogen-bond donor atom. In addition to its remarkable electronic properties (e.g., its higher aromaticity compared to benzene), C(6)At(6) can be involved as a halogen-bond donor and acceptor. Two-component relativistic calculations and quantum chemical topology analyses were performed on C(6)At(6) and its complexes as well as on their iodinated analogues for comparative purposes. The relativistic spin–orbit interaction was used as a tool to disclose the bonding patterns and the mechanisms that contribute to halogen-bond interactions. Despite the stronger polarizability of astatine, halogen bonds formed by C(6)At(6) can be comparable or weaker than those of C(6)I(6). This unexpected finding comes from the charge-shift bonding character of the C–At bonds. Because charge-shift bonding is connected to the Pauli repulsion between the bonding σ electrons and the σ lone-pair of astatine, it weakens the astatine electrophilicity at its σ-hole (reducing the charge transfer contribution to halogen bonding). These two antinomic characters, charge-shift bonding and halogen bonding, can result in weaker At-mediated interactions than their iodinated counterparts. MDPI 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8347445/ /pubmed/34361716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154568 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sarr, Serigne Pilmé, Julien Montavon, Gilles Le Questel, Jean-Yves Galland, Nicolas Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding |
title | Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding |
title_full | Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding |
title_fullStr | Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding |
title_full_unstemmed | Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding |
title_short | Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding |
title_sort | astatine facing janus: halogen bonding vs. charge-shift bonding |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sarrserigne astatinefacingjanushalogenbondingvschargeshiftbonding AT pilmejulien astatinefacingjanushalogenbondingvschargeshiftbonding AT montavongilles astatinefacingjanushalogenbondingvschargeshiftbonding AT lequesteljeanyves astatinefacingjanushalogenbondingvschargeshiftbonding AT gallandnicolas astatinefacingjanushalogenbondingvschargeshiftbonding |