Cargando…

Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding

The nature of halogen-bond interactions was scrutinized from the perspective of astatine, potentially the strongest halogen-bond donor atom. In addition to its remarkable electronic properties (e.g., its higher aromaticity compared to benzene), C(6)At(6) can be involved as a halogen-bond donor and a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarr, Serigne, Pilmé, Julien, Montavon, Gilles, Le Questel, Jean-Yves, Galland, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154568
_version_ 1783735091292274688
author Sarr, Serigne
Pilmé, Julien
Montavon, Gilles
Le Questel, Jean-Yves
Galland, Nicolas
author_facet Sarr, Serigne
Pilmé, Julien
Montavon, Gilles
Le Questel, Jean-Yves
Galland, Nicolas
author_sort Sarr, Serigne
collection PubMed
description The nature of halogen-bond interactions was scrutinized from the perspective of astatine, potentially the strongest halogen-bond donor atom. In addition to its remarkable electronic properties (e.g., its higher aromaticity compared to benzene), C(6)At(6) can be involved as a halogen-bond donor and acceptor. Two-component relativistic calculations and quantum chemical topology analyses were performed on C(6)At(6) and its complexes as well as on their iodinated analogues for comparative purposes. The relativistic spin–orbit interaction was used as a tool to disclose the bonding patterns and the mechanisms that contribute to halogen-bond interactions. Despite the stronger polarizability of astatine, halogen bonds formed by C(6)At(6) can be comparable or weaker than those of C(6)I(6). This unexpected finding comes from the charge-shift bonding character of the C–At bonds. Because charge-shift bonding is connected to the Pauli repulsion between the bonding σ electrons and the σ lone-pair of astatine, it weakens the astatine electrophilicity at its σ-hole (reducing the charge transfer contribution to halogen bonding). These two antinomic characters, charge-shift bonding and halogen bonding, can result in weaker At-mediated interactions than their iodinated counterparts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8347445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83474452021-08-08 Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding Sarr, Serigne Pilmé, Julien Montavon, Gilles Le Questel, Jean-Yves Galland, Nicolas Molecules Article The nature of halogen-bond interactions was scrutinized from the perspective of astatine, potentially the strongest halogen-bond donor atom. In addition to its remarkable electronic properties (e.g., its higher aromaticity compared to benzene), C(6)At(6) can be involved as a halogen-bond donor and acceptor. Two-component relativistic calculations and quantum chemical topology analyses were performed on C(6)At(6) and its complexes as well as on their iodinated analogues for comparative purposes. The relativistic spin–orbit interaction was used as a tool to disclose the bonding patterns and the mechanisms that contribute to halogen-bond interactions. Despite the stronger polarizability of astatine, halogen bonds formed by C(6)At(6) can be comparable or weaker than those of C(6)I(6). This unexpected finding comes from the charge-shift bonding character of the C–At bonds. Because charge-shift bonding is connected to the Pauli repulsion between the bonding σ electrons and the σ lone-pair of astatine, it weakens the astatine electrophilicity at its σ-hole (reducing the charge transfer contribution to halogen bonding). These two antinomic characters, charge-shift bonding and halogen bonding, can result in weaker At-mediated interactions than their iodinated counterparts. MDPI 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8347445/ /pubmed/34361716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154568 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sarr, Serigne
Pilmé, Julien
Montavon, Gilles
Le Questel, Jean-Yves
Galland, Nicolas
Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding
title Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding
title_full Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding
title_fullStr Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding
title_full_unstemmed Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding
title_short Astatine Facing Janus: Halogen Bonding vs. Charge-Shift Bonding
title_sort astatine facing janus: halogen bonding vs. charge-shift bonding
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154568
work_keys_str_mv AT sarrserigne astatinefacingjanushalogenbondingvschargeshiftbonding
AT pilmejulien astatinefacingjanushalogenbondingvschargeshiftbonding
AT montavongilles astatinefacingjanushalogenbondingvschargeshiftbonding
AT lequesteljeanyves astatinefacingjanushalogenbondingvschargeshiftbonding
AT gallandnicolas astatinefacingjanushalogenbondingvschargeshiftbonding