Cargando…

Rates, Indications, and Speech Perception Outcomes of Revision Cochlear Implantations

Revision cochlear implant (RCI) is a growing burden on cochlear implant programs. While reports on RCI rate are frequent, outcome measures are limited. The objectives of the current study were to: (1) evaluate RCI rate, (2) classify indications, (3) delineate the pre-RCI clinical course, and (4) mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sagiv, Doron, Yaar-Soffer, Yifat, Yakir, Ziva, Henkin, Yael, Shapira, Yisgav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153215
_version_ 1783735113946759168
author Sagiv, Doron
Yaar-Soffer, Yifat
Yakir, Ziva
Henkin, Yael
Shapira, Yisgav
author_facet Sagiv, Doron
Yaar-Soffer, Yifat
Yakir, Ziva
Henkin, Yael
Shapira, Yisgav
author_sort Sagiv, Doron
collection PubMed
description Revision cochlear implant (RCI) is a growing burden on cochlear implant programs. While reports on RCI rate are frequent, outcome measures are limited. The objectives of the current study were to: (1) evaluate RCI rate, (2) classify indications, (3) delineate the pre-RCI clinical course, and (4) measure surgical and speech perception outcomes, in a large cohort of patients implanted in a tertiary referral center between 1989–2018. Retrospective data review was performed and included patient demographics, medical records, and audiologic outcomes. Results indicated that RCI rate was 11.7% (172/1465), with a trend of increased RCI load over the years. The main indications for RCI were device-related failures (soft-45.4%, hard-23.8%), medical failure (14%), trauma (8.1%), and surgical failure (6.4%). Success rate was 98.8%. Children comprised 78% (134) of the cohort and were more likely than adults to undergo RCI. Most (70%) of the RCIs were performed within 10 years from primary implantation. Speech perception outcome analysis revealed unchanged or improved performance in 85% of the cases and declined performance in 15%. Current findings confirm that RCI is a safe with high clinical efficacy; however, the non-negligible percentage of patients that exhibited declined performance post-RCI should be considered in decision-making processes regarding RCI. Routine follow-up during their first years post-implantation is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8347537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83475372021-08-08 Rates, Indications, and Speech Perception Outcomes of Revision Cochlear Implantations Sagiv, Doron Yaar-Soffer, Yifat Yakir, Ziva Henkin, Yael Shapira, Yisgav J Clin Med Article Revision cochlear implant (RCI) is a growing burden on cochlear implant programs. While reports on RCI rate are frequent, outcome measures are limited. The objectives of the current study were to: (1) evaluate RCI rate, (2) classify indications, (3) delineate the pre-RCI clinical course, and (4) measure surgical and speech perception outcomes, in a large cohort of patients implanted in a tertiary referral center between 1989–2018. Retrospective data review was performed and included patient demographics, medical records, and audiologic outcomes. Results indicated that RCI rate was 11.7% (172/1465), with a trend of increased RCI load over the years. The main indications for RCI were device-related failures (soft-45.4%, hard-23.8%), medical failure (14%), trauma (8.1%), and surgical failure (6.4%). Success rate was 98.8%. Children comprised 78% (134) of the cohort and were more likely than adults to undergo RCI. Most (70%) of the RCIs were performed within 10 years from primary implantation. Speech perception outcome analysis revealed unchanged or improved performance in 85% of the cases and declined performance in 15%. Current findings confirm that RCI is a safe with high clinical efficacy; however, the non-negligible percentage of patients that exhibited declined performance post-RCI should be considered in decision-making processes regarding RCI. Routine follow-up during their first years post-implantation is warranted. MDPI 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8347537/ /pubmed/34361999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153215 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sagiv, Doron
Yaar-Soffer, Yifat
Yakir, Ziva
Henkin, Yael
Shapira, Yisgav
Rates, Indications, and Speech Perception Outcomes of Revision Cochlear Implantations
title Rates, Indications, and Speech Perception Outcomes of Revision Cochlear Implantations
title_full Rates, Indications, and Speech Perception Outcomes of Revision Cochlear Implantations
title_fullStr Rates, Indications, and Speech Perception Outcomes of Revision Cochlear Implantations
title_full_unstemmed Rates, Indications, and Speech Perception Outcomes of Revision Cochlear Implantations
title_short Rates, Indications, and Speech Perception Outcomes of Revision Cochlear Implantations
title_sort rates, indications, and speech perception outcomes of revision cochlear implantations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153215
work_keys_str_mv AT sagivdoron ratesindicationsandspeechperceptionoutcomesofrevisioncochlearimplantations
AT yaarsofferyifat ratesindicationsandspeechperceptionoutcomesofrevisioncochlearimplantations
AT yakirziva ratesindicationsandspeechperceptionoutcomesofrevisioncochlearimplantations
AT henkinyael ratesindicationsandspeechperceptionoutcomesofrevisioncochlearimplantations
AT shapirayisgav ratesindicationsandspeechperceptionoutcomesofrevisioncochlearimplantations