Cargando…

Effects of Non-thermal Ultrasound on a Fibroblast Monolayer Culture: Influence of Pulse Number and Pulse Repetition Frequency

Despite the use of therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of soft tissue pathologies, there remains some controversy regarding its efficacy. In order to develop new treatment protocols, it is a common practice to carry out in vitro studies in cell cultures before conducting animal tests. The lack o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ronda Peñacoba, Silvia, Fernández Gutiérrez, Mar, San Román del Barrio, Julio, Montero de Espinosa, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155040
_version_ 1783735134147575808
author Ronda Peñacoba, Silvia
Fernández Gutiérrez, Mar
San Román del Barrio, Julio
Montero de Espinosa, Francisco
author_facet Ronda Peñacoba, Silvia
Fernández Gutiérrez, Mar
San Román del Barrio, Julio
Montero de Espinosa, Francisco
author_sort Ronda Peñacoba, Silvia
collection PubMed
description Despite the use of therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of soft tissue pathologies, there remains some controversy regarding its efficacy. In order to develop new treatment protocols, it is a common practice to carry out in vitro studies in cell cultures before conducting animal tests. The lack of reproducibility of the experimental results observed in the literature concerning in vitro experiments motivated us to establish a methodology for characterizing the acoustic field in culture plate wells. In this work, such acoustic fields are fully characterized in a real experimental configuration, with the transducer being placed in contact with the surface of a standard 12-well culture plate. To study the non-thermal effects of ultrasound on fibroblasts, two different treatment protocols are proposed: long pulse (200 cycles) signals, which give rise to a standing wave in the well with the presence of cavitation (I(SPTP) (max) = 19.25 W/cm(2)), and a short pulse (five cycles) of high acoustic pressure, which produces a number of echoes in the cavity (I(SPTP) = 33.1 W/cm(2), with P(max) = 1.01 MPa). The influence of the acoustic intensity, the number of pulses, and the pulse repetition frequency was studied. We further analyzed the correlation of these acoustic parameters with cell viability, population, occupied surface, and cell morphology. Lytic effects when cavitation was present, as well as mechanotransduction reactions, were observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8347617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83476172021-08-08 Effects of Non-thermal Ultrasound on a Fibroblast Monolayer Culture: Influence of Pulse Number and Pulse Repetition Frequency Ronda Peñacoba, Silvia Fernández Gutiérrez, Mar San Román del Barrio, Julio Montero de Espinosa, Francisco Sensors (Basel) Article Despite the use of therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of soft tissue pathologies, there remains some controversy regarding its efficacy. In order to develop new treatment protocols, it is a common practice to carry out in vitro studies in cell cultures before conducting animal tests. The lack of reproducibility of the experimental results observed in the literature concerning in vitro experiments motivated us to establish a methodology for characterizing the acoustic field in culture plate wells. In this work, such acoustic fields are fully characterized in a real experimental configuration, with the transducer being placed in contact with the surface of a standard 12-well culture plate. To study the non-thermal effects of ultrasound on fibroblasts, two different treatment protocols are proposed: long pulse (200 cycles) signals, which give rise to a standing wave in the well with the presence of cavitation (I(SPTP) (max) = 19.25 W/cm(2)), and a short pulse (five cycles) of high acoustic pressure, which produces a number of echoes in the cavity (I(SPTP) = 33.1 W/cm(2), with P(max) = 1.01 MPa). The influence of the acoustic intensity, the number of pulses, and the pulse repetition frequency was studied. We further analyzed the correlation of these acoustic parameters with cell viability, population, occupied surface, and cell morphology. Lytic effects when cavitation was present, as well as mechanotransduction reactions, were observed. MDPI 2021-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8347617/ /pubmed/34372277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155040 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ronda Peñacoba, Silvia
Fernández Gutiérrez, Mar
San Román del Barrio, Julio
Montero de Espinosa, Francisco
Effects of Non-thermal Ultrasound on a Fibroblast Monolayer Culture: Influence of Pulse Number and Pulse Repetition Frequency
title Effects of Non-thermal Ultrasound on a Fibroblast Monolayer Culture: Influence of Pulse Number and Pulse Repetition Frequency
title_full Effects of Non-thermal Ultrasound on a Fibroblast Monolayer Culture: Influence of Pulse Number and Pulse Repetition Frequency
title_fullStr Effects of Non-thermal Ultrasound on a Fibroblast Monolayer Culture: Influence of Pulse Number and Pulse Repetition Frequency
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Non-thermal Ultrasound on a Fibroblast Monolayer Culture: Influence of Pulse Number and Pulse Repetition Frequency
title_short Effects of Non-thermal Ultrasound on a Fibroblast Monolayer Culture: Influence of Pulse Number and Pulse Repetition Frequency
title_sort effects of non-thermal ultrasound on a fibroblast monolayer culture: influence of pulse number and pulse repetition frequency
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155040
work_keys_str_mv AT rondapenacobasilvia effectsofnonthermalultrasoundonafibroblastmonolayercultureinfluenceofpulsenumberandpulserepetitionfrequency
AT fernandezgutierrezmar effectsofnonthermalultrasoundonafibroblastmonolayercultureinfluenceofpulsenumberandpulserepetitionfrequency
AT sanromandelbarriojulio effectsofnonthermalultrasoundonafibroblastmonolayercultureinfluenceofpulsenumberandpulserepetitionfrequency
AT monterodeespinosafrancisco effectsofnonthermalultrasoundonafibroblastmonolayercultureinfluenceofpulsenumberandpulserepetitionfrequency