Cargando…

Airway Care Interventions for Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Adults—A Dutch National Survey

Airway care interventions may prevent accumulation of airway secretions and promote their evacuation, but evidence is scarce. Interventions include heated humidification, nebulization of mucolytics and/or bronchodilators, manual hyperinflation and use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stilma, Willemke, van der Hoeven, Sophia M., Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M., Schultz, Marcus J., Rose, Louise, Paulus, Frederique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153381
_version_ 1783735211095228416
author Stilma, Willemke
van der Hoeven, Sophia M.
Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M.
Schultz, Marcus J.
Rose, Louise
Paulus, Frederique
author_facet Stilma, Willemke
van der Hoeven, Sophia M.
Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M.
Schultz, Marcus J.
Rose, Louise
Paulus, Frederique
author_sort Stilma, Willemke
collection PubMed
description Airway care interventions may prevent accumulation of airway secretions and promote their evacuation, but evidence is scarce. Interventions include heated humidification, nebulization of mucolytics and/or bronchodilators, manual hyperinflation and use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E). Our aim is to identify current airway care practices for invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICU) in the Netherlands. A self–administered web-based survey was sent to a single pre–appointed representative of all ICUs in the Netherlands. Response rate was 85% (72 ICUs). We found substantial heterogeneity in the intensity and combinations of airway care interventions used. Most (81%) ICUs reported using heated humidification as a routine prophylactic intervention. All (100%) responding ICUs used nebulized mucolytics and/or bronchodilators; however, only 43% ICUs reported nebulization as a routine prophylactic intervention. Most (81%) ICUs used manual hyperinflation, although only initiated with a clinical indication like difficult oxygenation. Few (22%) ICUs used MI-E for invasively ventilated patients. Use was always based on the indication of insufficient cough strength or as a continuation of home use. In the Netherlands, use of routine prophylactic airway care interventions is common despite evidence of no benefit. There is an urgent need for evidence of the benefit of these interventions to inform evidence-based guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8347919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83479192021-08-08 Airway Care Interventions for Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Adults—A Dutch National Survey Stilma, Willemke van der Hoeven, Sophia M. Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M. Schultz, Marcus J. Rose, Louise Paulus, Frederique J Clin Med Article Airway care interventions may prevent accumulation of airway secretions and promote their evacuation, but evidence is scarce. Interventions include heated humidification, nebulization of mucolytics and/or bronchodilators, manual hyperinflation and use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E). Our aim is to identify current airway care practices for invasively ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICU) in the Netherlands. A self–administered web-based survey was sent to a single pre–appointed representative of all ICUs in the Netherlands. Response rate was 85% (72 ICUs). We found substantial heterogeneity in the intensity and combinations of airway care interventions used. Most (81%) ICUs reported using heated humidification as a routine prophylactic intervention. All (100%) responding ICUs used nebulized mucolytics and/or bronchodilators; however, only 43% ICUs reported nebulization as a routine prophylactic intervention. Most (81%) ICUs used manual hyperinflation, although only initiated with a clinical indication like difficult oxygenation. Few (22%) ICUs used MI-E for invasively ventilated patients. Use was always based on the indication of insufficient cough strength or as a continuation of home use. In the Netherlands, use of routine prophylactic airway care interventions is common despite evidence of no benefit. There is an urgent need for evidence of the benefit of these interventions to inform evidence-based guidelines. MDPI 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8347919/ /pubmed/34362165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153381 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stilma, Willemke
van der Hoeven, Sophia M.
Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M.
Schultz, Marcus J.
Rose, Louise
Paulus, Frederique
Airway Care Interventions for Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Adults—A Dutch National Survey
title Airway Care Interventions for Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Adults—A Dutch National Survey
title_full Airway Care Interventions for Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Adults—A Dutch National Survey
title_fullStr Airway Care Interventions for Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Adults—A Dutch National Survey
title_full_unstemmed Airway Care Interventions for Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Adults—A Dutch National Survey
title_short Airway Care Interventions for Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Adults—A Dutch National Survey
title_sort airway care interventions for invasively ventilated critically ill adults—a dutch national survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153381
work_keys_str_mv AT stilmawillemke airwaycareinterventionsforinvasivelyventilatedcriticallyilladultsadutchnationalsurvey
AT vanderhoevensophiam airwaycareinterventionsforinvasivelyventilatedcriticallyilladultsadutchnationalsurvey
AT scholteopreimerwilmajm airwaycareinterventionsforinvasivelyventilatedcriticallyilladultsadutchnationalsurvey
AT schultzmarcusj airwaycareinterventionsforinvasivelyventilatedcriticallyilladultsadutchnationalsurvey
AT roselouise airwaycareinterventionsforinvasivelyventilatedcriticallyilladultsadutchnationalsurvey
AT paulusfrederique airwaycareinterventionsforinvasivelyventilatedcriticallyilladultsadutchnationalsurvey