Cargando…

Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study

Implant stability is one of the main indicators of successful osseointegration. Although it has been measured in numerous studies, there has been little research on implant stability in regenerated bone. The study compares primary and secondary stability between implants placed in regenerated versus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vallecillo-Rivas, Marta, Reyes-Botella, Candela, Vallecillo, Cristina, Lisbona-González, María Jesús, Vallecillo-Capilla, Manuel, Olmedo-Gaya, María Victoria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153220
_version_ 1783735230618664960
author Vallecillo-Rivas, Marta
Reyes-Botella, Candela
Vallecillo, Cristina
Lisbona-González, María Jesús
Vallecillo-Capilla, Manuel
Olmedo-Gaya, María Victoria
author_facet Vallecillo-Rivas, Marta
Reyes-Botella, Candela
Vallecillo, Cristina
Lisbona-González, María Jesús
Vallecillo-Capilla, Manuel
Olmedo-Gaya, María Victoria
author_sort Vallecillo-Rivas, Marta
collection PubMed
description Implant stability is one of the main indicators of successful osseointegration. Although it has been measured in numerous studies, there has been little research on implant stability in regenerated bone. The study compares primary and secondary stability between implants placed in regenerated versus native bone and evaluates the influence of bone quality on the results. Sixty implants were placed in 31 patients: 30 implants inserted in native bone (non-regenerated) after a healing period of at least 6 months post-exodontia and 30 inserted in regenerated bone at 6 months after grafting with xenograft. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was used to obtain implant stability quotient (ISQ) values at baseline (implant placement), 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Statistically significant differences were found between implants placed in regenerated bone and those placed in native bone at all measurement time points (p < 0.05). ISQ values were significantly influenced by bone quality at baseline (p < 0.05) but not at 8 or 12 weeks. Greater stability was obtained in implants placed in native bone; however, those placed in regenerated bone showed adequate primary and secondary stability for prosthetic loading. Bone quality influences the primary but not secondary stability of the implants in both native and regenerated bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8347999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83479992021-08-08 Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study Vallecillo-Rivas, Marta Reyes-Botella, Candela Vallecillo, Cristina Lisbona-González, María Jesús Vallecillo-Capilla, Manuel Olmedo-Gaya, María Victoria J Clin Med Article Implant stability is one of the main indicators of successful osseointegration. Although it has been measured in numerous studies, there has been little research on implant stability in regenerated bone. The study compares primary and secondary stability between implants placed in regenerated versus native bone and evaluates the influence of bone quality on the results. Sixty implants were placed in 31 patients: 30 implants inserted in native bone (non-regenerated) after a healing period of at least 6 months post-exodontia and 30 inserted in regenerated bone at 6 months after grafting with xenograft. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was used to obtain implant stability quotient (ISQ) values at baseline (implant placement), 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Statistically significant differences were found between implants placed in regenerated bone and those placed in native bone at all measurement time points (p < 0.05). ISQ values were significantly influenced by bone quality at baseline (p < 0.05) but not at 8 or 12 weeks. Greater stability was obtained in implants placed in native bone; however, those placed in regenerated bone showed adequate primary and secondary stability for prosthetic loading. Bone quality influences the primary but not secondary stability of the implants in both native and regenerated bone. MDPI 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8347999/ /pubmed/34362004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153220 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vallecillo-Rivas, Marta
Reyes-Botella, Candela
Vallecillo, Cristina
Lisbona-González, María Jesús
Vallecillo-Capilla, Manuel
Olmedo-Gaya, María Victoria
Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study
title Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study
title_short Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study
title_sort comparison of implant stability between regenerated and non-regenerated bone. a prospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8347999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153220
work_keys_str_mv AT vallecillorivasmarta comparisonofimplantstabilitybetweenregeneratedandnonregeneratedboneaprospectivecohortstudy
AT reyesbotellacandela comparisonofimplantstabilitybetweenregeneratedandnonregeneratedboneaprospectivecohortstudy
AT vallecillocristina comparisonofimplantstabilitybetweenregeneratedandnonregeneratedboneaprospectivecohortstudy
AT lisbonagonzalezmariajesus comparisonofimplantstabilitybetweenregeneratedandnonregeneratedboneaprospectivecohortstudy
AT vallecillocapillamanuel comparisonofimplantstabilitybetweenregeneratedandnonregeneratedboneaprospectivecohortstudy
AT olmedogayamariavictoria comparisonofimplantstabilitybetweenregeneratedandnonregeneratedboneaprospectivecohortstudy