Cargando…

Comparison of Aerial Thermal Infrared Imagery and Helicopter Surveys of Bison (Bison bison) in Grand Canyon National Park, USA

Aerial thermal infrared (TIR) surveys are an attractive option for estimating abundances of large mammals inhabiting extensive and heterogeneous terrain. Compared to standard helicopter or fixed-wing aerial surveys, TIR flights can be conducted at higher altitudes translating into greater spatial co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hennig, Jacob D., Schoenecker, Kathryn A., Terwilliger, Miranda L.N., Holm, Gregory W., Laake, Jeffrey L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8348576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372324
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155087
_version_ 1783735373802766336
author Hennig, Jacob D.
Schoenecker, Kathryn A.
Terwilliger, Miranda L.N.
Holm, Gregory W.
Laake, Jeffrey L.
author_facet Hennig, Jacob D.
Schoenecker, Kathryn A.
Terwilliger, Miranda L.N.
Holm, Gregory W.
Laake, Jeffrey L.
author_sort Hennig, Jacob D.
collection PubMed
description Aerial thermal infrared (TIR) surveys are an attractive option for estimating abundances of large mammals inhabiting extensive and heterogeneous terrain. Compared to standard helicopter or fixed-wing aerial surveys, TIR flights can be conducted at higher altitudes translating into greater spatial coverage and increased observer safety; however, monetary costs are much greater. Further, there is no consensus on whether TIR surveys offer improved detection. Consequently, we performed a study to compare results of a TIR and helicopter survey of bison (Bison bison) on the Powell Plateau in Grand Canyon National Park, USA. We also compared results of both surveys to estimates obtained using a larger dataset of bison helicopter detections along the entire North Rim of the Grand Canyon. Observers in the TIR survey counted fewer individual bison than helicopter observers (101 to 127) and the TIR survey cost was 367% higher. Additionally, the TIR estimate was 18.8% lower than the estimate obtained using a larger dataset, while the comparative helicopter survey was 9.3% lower. Despite our small sample size, we found that helicopter surveys are currently the best method for estimating bison abundances in dense canopy cover sites due to ostensibly more accurate estimates and lower cost compared to TIR surveys. Additional research will be needed to evaluate the efficacy of these methods, as well as very high resolution satellite imagery, for bison populations in more open landscapes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8348576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83485762021-08-08 Comparison of Aerial Thermal Infrared Imagery and Helicopter Surveys of Bison (Bison bison) in Grand Canyon National Park, USA Hennig, Jacob D. Schoenecker, Kathryn A. Terwilliger, Miranda L.N. Holm, Gregory W. Laake, Jeffrey L. Sensors (Basel) Communication Aerial thermal infrared (TIR) surveys are an attractive option for estimating abundances of large mammals inhabiting extensive and heterogeneous terrain. Compared to standard helicopter or fixed-wing aerial surveys, TIR flights can be conducted at higher altitudes translating into greater spatial coverage and increased observer safety; however, monetary costs are much greater. Further, there is no consensus on whether TIR surveys offer improved detection. Consequently, we performed a study to compare results of a TIR and helicopter survey of bison (Bison bison) on the Powell Plateau in Grand Canyon National Park, USA. We also compared results of both surveys to estimates obtained using a larger dataset of bison helicopter detections along the entire North Rim of the Grand Canyon. Observers in the TIR survey counted fewer individual bison than helicopter observers (101 to 127) and the TIR survey cost was 367% higher. Additionally, the TIR estimate was 18.8% lower than the estimate obtained using a larger dataset, while the comparative helicopter survey was 9.3% lower. Despite our small sample size, we found that helicopter surveys are currently the best method for estimating bison abundances in dense canopy cover sites due to ostensibly more accurate estimates and lower cost compared to TIR surveys. Additional research will be needed to evaluate the efficacy of these methods, as well as very high resolution satellite imagery, for bison populations in more open landscapes. MDPI 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8348576/ /pubmed/34372324 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155087 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Hennig, Jacob D.
Schoenecker, Kathryn A.
Terwilliger, Miranda L.N.
Holm, Gregory W.
Laake, Jeffrey L.
Comparison of Aerial Thermal Infrared Imagery and Helicopter Surveys of Bison (Bison bison) in Grand Canyon National Park, USA
title Comparison of Aerial Thermal Infrared Imagery and Helicopter Surveys of Bison (Bison bison) in Grand Canyon National Park, USA
title_full Comparison of Aerial Thermal Infrared Imagery and Helicopter Surveys of Bison (Bison bison) in Grand Canyon National Park, USA
title_fullStr Comparison of Aerial Thermal Infrared Imagery and Helicopter Surveys of Bison (Bison bison) in Grand Canyon National Park, USA
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Aerial Thermal Infrared Imagery and Helicopter Surveys of Bison (Bison bison) in Grand Canyon National Park, USA
title_short Comparison of Aerial Thermal Infrared Imagery and Helicopter Surveys of Bison (Bison bison) in Grand Canyon National Park, USA
title_sort comparison of aerial thermal infrared imagery and helicopter surveys of bison (bison bison) in grand canyon national park, usa
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8348576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372324
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155087
work_keys_str_mv AT hennigjacobd comparisonofaerialthermalinfraredimageryandhelicoptersurveysofbisonbisonbisoningrandcanyonnationalparkusa
AT schoeneckerkathryna comparisonofaerialthermalinfraredimageryandhelicoptersurveysofbisonbisonbisoningrandcanyonnationalparkusa
AT terwilligermirandaln comparisonofaerialthermalinfraredimageryandhelicoptersurveysofbisonbisonbisoningrandcanyonnationalparkusa
AT holmgregoryw comparisonofaerialthermalinfraredimageryandhelicoptersurveysofbisonbisonbisoningrandcanyonnationalparkusa
AT laakejeffreyl comparisonofaerialthermalinfraredimageryandhelicoptersurveysofbisonbisonbisoningrandcanyonnationalparkusa