Cargando…

Effect of Microbial Inoculation on Carbon Preservation during Goat Manure Aerobic Composting

Carbon is the crucial source of energy during aerobic composting. There are few studies that explore carbon preservation by inoculation with microbial agents during goat manure composting. Hence, this study inoculated three proportions of microbial agents to investigate the preservation of carbon du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Jiawei, Wang, Jingang, Gao, Qin, Li, Dongxu, Chen, Zili, Wei, Zongyou, Zhang, Yanli, Wang, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8348721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154441
_version_ 1783735409436524544
author Lu, Jiawei
Wang, Jingang
Gao, Qin
Li, Dongxu
Chen, Zili
Wei, Zongyou
Zhang, Yanli
Wang, Feng
author_facet Lu, Jiawei
Wang, Jingang
Gao, Qin
Li, Dongxu
Chen, Zili
Wei, Zongyou
Zhang, Yanli
Wang, Feng
author_sort Lu, Jiawei
collection PubMed
description Carbon is the crucial source of energy during aerobic composting. There are few studies that explore carbon preservation by inoculation with microbial agents during goat manure composting. Hence, this study inoculated three proportions of microbial agents to investigate the preservation of carbon during goat manure composting. The microbial inoculums were composed of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Trichoderma viride, Aspergillus niger, and yeast, and the proportions were B1 treatment (1:1:1:1:2), B2 treatment (2:2:1:1:2), and B3 treatment (3:3:1:1:2). The results showed that the contents of total organic carbon were enriched by 12.21%, 4.87%, and 1.90% in B1 treatment, B2 treatment, and B3 treatment, respectively. The total organic carbon contents of B1 treatment, B2 treatment, and B3 treatment were 402.00 ± 2.65, 366.33 ± 1.53, and 378.33 ± 2.08 g/kg, respectively. B1 treatment significantly increased the content of total organic carbon compared with the other two treatments (p < 0.05). Moreover, the ratio of 1:1:1:1:2 significantly reduced the moisture content, pH value, EC value, hemicellulose, and lignin contents (p < 0.05), and significantly increased the GI value and the content of humic acid carbon (p < 0.05). Consequently, the preservation of carbon might be a result not only of the enrichment of the humic acid carbon and the decomposition of hemicellulose and lignin, but also the increased OTU amount and Lactobacillus abundance. This result provided a ratio of microbial agents to preserve the carbon during goat manure aerobic composting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8348721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83487212021-08-08 Effect of Microbial Inoculation on Carbon Preservation during Goat Manure Aerobic Composting Lu, Jiawei Wang, Jingang Gao, Qin Li, Dongxu Chen, Zili Wei, Zongyou Zhang, Yanli Wang, Feng Molecules Article Carbon is the crucial source of energy during aerobic composting. There are few studies that explore carbon preservation by inoculation with microbial agents during goat manure composting. Hence, this study inoculated three proportions of microbial agents to investigate the preservation of carbon during goat manure composting. The microbial inoculums were composed of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Trichoderma viride, Aspergillus niger, and yeast, and the proportions were B1 treatment (1:1:1:1:2), B2 treatment (2:2:1:1:2), and B3 treatment (3:3:1:1:2). The results showed that the contents of total organic carbon were enriched by 12.21%, 4.87%, and 1.90% in B1 treatment, B2 treatment, and B3 treatment, respectively. The total organic carbon contents of B1 treatment, B2 treatment, and B3 treatment were 402.00 ± 2.65, 366.33 ± 1.53, and 378.33 ± 2.08 g/kg, respectively. B1 treatment significantly increased the content of total organic carbon compared with the other two treatments (p < 0.05). Moreover, the ratio of 1:1:1:1:2 significantly reduced the moisture content, pH value, EC value, hemicellulose, and lignin contents (p < 0.05), and significantly increased the GI value and the content of humic acid carbon (p < 0.05). Consequently, the preservation of carbon might be a result not only of the enrichment of the humic acid carbon and the decomposition of hemicellulose and lignin, but also the increased OTU amount and Lactobacillus abundance. This result provided a ratio of microbial agents to preserve the carbon during goat manure aerobic composting. MDPI 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8348721/ /pubmed/34361594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154441 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lu, Jiawei
Wang, Jingang
Gao, Qin
Li, Dongxu
Chen, Zili
Wei, Zongyou
Zhang, Yanli
Wang, Feng
Effect of Microbial Inoculation on Carbon Preservation during Goat Manure Aerobic Composting
title Effect of Microbial Inoculation on Carbon Preservation during Goat Manure Aerobic Composting
title_full Effect of Microbial Inoculation on Carbon Preservation during Goat Manure Aerobic Composting
title_fullStr Effect of Microbial Inoculation on Carbon Preservation during Goat Manure Aerobic Composting
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Microbial Inoculation on Carbon Preservation during Goat Manure Aerobic Composting
title_short Effect of Microbial Inoculation on Carbon Preservation during Goat Manure Aerobic Composting
title_sort effect of microbial inoculation on carbon preservation during goat manure aerobic composting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8348721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34361594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154441
work_keys_str_mv AT lujiawei effectofmicrobialinoculationoncarbonpreservationduringgoatmanureaerobiccomposting
AT wangjingang effectofmicrobialinoculationoncarbonpreservationduringgoatmanureaerobiccomposting
AT gaoqin effectofmicrobialinoculationoncarbonpreservationduringgoatmanureaerobiccomposting
AT lidongxu effectofmicrobialinoculationoncarbonpreservationduringgoatmanureaerobiccomposting
AT chenzili effectofmicrobialinoculationoncarbonpreservationduringgoatmanureaerobiccomposting
AT weizongyou effectofmicrobialinoculationoncarbonpreservationduringgoatmanureaerobiccomposting
AT zhangyanli effectofmicrobialinoculationoncarbonpreservationduringgoatmanureaerobiccomposting
AT wangfeng effectofmicrobialinoculationoncarbonpreservationduringgoatmanureaerobiccomposting