Cargando…

Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area

Landslide inventories could provide fundamental data for analyzing the causative factors and deformation mechanisms of landslide events. Considering that it is still hard to detect landslides automatically from remote sensing images, endeavors have been carried out to explore the potential of DCNNs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Chang, Yi, Bangjin, Gao, Peng, Li, Hui, Sun, Jixing, Chen, Xueye, Zhong, Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8348725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372428
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155191
_version_ 1783735410457837568
author Li, Chang
Yi, Bangjin
Gao, Peng
Li, Hui
Sun, Jixing
Chen, Xueye
Zhong, Cheng
author_facet Li, Chang
Yi, Bangjin
Gao, Peng
Li, Hui
Sun, Jixing
Chen, Xueye
Zhong, Cheng
author_sort Li, Chang
collection PubMed
description Landslide inventories could provide fundamental data for analyzing the causative factors and deformation mechanisms of landslide events. Considering that it is still hard to detect landslides automatically from remote sensing images, endeavors have been carried out to explore the potential of DCNNs on landslide detection, and obtained better performance than shallow machine learning methods. However, there is often confusion as to which structure, layer number, and sample size are better for a project. To fill this gap, this study conducted a comparative test on typical models for landside detection in the Wenchuan earthquake area, where about 200,000 secondary landslides were available. Multiple structures and layer numbers, including VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, ResNet101, DenseNet120, DenseNet201, UNet−, UNet+, and ResUNet were investigated with different sample numbers (100, 1000, and 10,000). Results indicate that VGG models have the highest precision (about 0.9) but the lowest recall (below 0.76); ResNet models display the lowest precision (below 0.86) and a high recall (about 0.85); DenseNet models obtain moderate precision (below 0.88) and recall (about 0.8); while UNet+ also achieves moderate precision (0.8) and recall (0.84). Generally, a larger sample set can lead to better performance for VGG, ResNet, and DenseNet, and deeper layers could improve the detection results for ResNet and DenseNet. This study provides valuable clues for designing models’ type, layers, and sample set, based on tests with a large number of samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8348725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83487252021-08-08 Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area Li, Chang Yi, Bangjin Gao, Peng Li, Hui Sun, Jixing Chen, Xueye Zhong, Cheng Sensors (Basel) Communication Landslide inventories could provide fundamental data for analyzing the causative factors and deformation mechanisms of landslide events. Considering that it is still hard to detect landslides automatically from remote sensing images, endeavors have been carried out to explore the potential of DCNNs on landslide detection, and obtained better performance than shallow machine learning methods. However, there is often confusion as to which structure, layer number, and sample size are better for a project. To fill this gap, this study conducted a comparative test on typical models for landside detection in the Wenchuan earthquake area, where about 200,000 secondary landslides were available. Multiple structures and layer numbers, including VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, ResNet101, DenseNet120, DenseNet201, UNet−, UNet+, and ResUNet were investigated with different sample numbers (100, 1000, and 10,000). Results indicate that VGG models have the highest precision (about 0.9) but the lowest recall (below 0.76); ResNet models display the lowest precision (below 0.86) and a high recall (about 0.85); DenseNet models obtain moderate precision (below 0.88) and recall (about 0.8); while UNet+ also achieves moderate precision (0.8) and recall (0.84). Generally, a larger sample set can lead to better performance for VGG, ResNet, and DenseNet, and deeper layers could improve the detection results for ResNet and DenseNet. This study provides valuable clues for designing models’ type, layers, and sample set, based on tests with a large number of samples. MDPI 2021-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8348725/ /pubmed/34372428 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155191 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Li, Chang
Yi, Bangjin
Gao, Peng
Li, Hui
Sun, Jixing
Chen, Xueye
Zhong, Cheng
Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area
title Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area
title_full Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area
title_fullStr Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area
title_full_unstemmed Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area
title_short Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area
title_sort valuable clues for dcnn-based landslide detection from a comparative assessment in the wenchuan earthquake area
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8348725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372428
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155191
work_keys_str_mv AT lichang valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea
AT yibangjin valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea
AT gaopeng valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea
AT lihui valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea
AT sunjixing valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea
AT chenxueye valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea
AT zhongcheng valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea