Cargando…
Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area
Landslide inventories could provide fundamental data for analyzing the causative factors and deformation mechanisms of landslide events. Considering that it is still hard to detect landslides automatically from remote sensing images, endeavors have been carried out to explore the potential of DCNNs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8348725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372428 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155191 |
_version_ | 1783735410457837568 |
---|---|
author | Li, Chang Yi, Bangjin Gao, Peng Li, Hui Sun, Jixing Chen, Xueye Zhong, Cheng |
author_facet | Li, Chang Yi, Bangjin Gao, Peng Li, Hui Sun, Jixing Chen, Xueye Zhong, Cheng |
author_sort | Li, Chang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Landslide inventories could provide fundamental data for analyzing the causative factors and deformation mechanisms of landslide events. Considering that it is still hard to detect landslides automatically from remote sensing images, endeavors have been carried out to explore the potential of DCNNs on landslide detection, and obtained better performance than shallow machine learning methods. However, there is often confusion as to which structure, layer number, and sample size are better for a project. To fill this gap, this study conducted a comparative test on typical models for landside detection in the Wenchuan earthquake area, where about 200,000 secondary landslides were available. Multiple structures and layer numbers, including VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, ResNet101, DenseNet120, DenseNet201, UNet−, UNet+, and ResUNet were investigated with different sample numbers (100, 1000, and 10,000). Results indicate that VGG models have the highest precision (about 0.9) but the lowest recall (below 0.76); ResNet models display the lowest precision (below 0.86) and a high recall (about 0.85); DenseNet models obtain moderate precision (below 0.88) and recall (about 0.8); while UNet+ also achieves moderate precision (0.8) and recall (0.84). Generally, a larger sample set can lead to better performance for VGG, ResNet, and DenseNet, and deeper layers could improve the detection results for ResNet and DenseNet. This study provides valuable clues for designing models’ type, layers, and sample set, based on tests with a large number of samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8348725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83487252021-08-08 Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area Li, Chang Yi, Bangjin Gao, Peng Li, Hui Sun, Jixing Chen, Xueye Zhong, Cheng Sensors (Basel) Communication Landslide inventories could provide fundamental data for analyzing the causative factors and deformation mechanisms of landslide events. Considering that it is still hard to detect landslides automatically from remote sensing images, endeavors have been carried out to explore the potential of DCNNs on landslide detection, and obtained better performance than shallow machine learning methods. However, there is often confusion as to which structure, layer number, and sample size are better for a project. To fill this gap, this study conducted a comparative test on typical models for landside detection in the Wenchuan earthquake area, where about 200,000 secondary landslides were available. Multiple structures and layer numbers, including VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, ResNet101, DenseNet120, DenseNet201, UNet−, UNet+, and ResUNet were investigated with different sample numbers (100, 1000, and 10,000). Results indicate that VGG models have the highest precision (about 0.9) but the lowest recall (below 0.76); ResNet models display the lowest precision (below 0.86) and a high recall (about 0.85); DenseNet models obtain moderate precision (below 0.88) and recall (about 0.8); while UNet+ also achieves moderate precision (0.8) and recall (0.84). Generally, a larger sample set can lead to better performance for VGG, ResNet, and DenseNet, and deeper layers could improve the detection results for ResNet and DenseNet. This study provides valuable clues for designing models’ type, layers, and sample set, based on tests with a large number of samples. MDPI 2021-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8348725/ /pubmed/34372428 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155191 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Li, Chang Yi, Bangjin Gao, Peng Li, Hui Sun, Jixing Chen, Xueye Zhong, Cheng Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area |
title | Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area |
title_full | Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area |
title_fullStr | Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area |
title_full_unstemmed | Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area |
title_short | Valuable Clues for DCNN-Based Landslide Detection from a Comparative Assessment in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area |
title_sort | valuable clues for dcnn-based landslide detection from a comparative assessment in the wenchuan earthquake area |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8348725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372428 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21155191 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lichang valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea AT yibangjin valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea AT gaopeng valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea AT lihui valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea AT sunjixing valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea AT chenxueye valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea AT zhongcheng valuablecluesfordcnnbasedlandslidedetectionfromacomparativeassessmentinthewenchuanearthquakearea |