Cargando…
Urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization among beneficiaries in China’s new cooperative medical scheme
BACKGROUND: The New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) is a voluntary social health insurance program launched in 2002 for rural Chinese residents where 80% of people were without health insurance of any kind. Over time, several concerns about this program have been raised related to healthcare utili...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8348873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11573-3 |
_version_ | 1783735446932553728 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Dian Deng, Jing Becker, Edmund R. |
author_facet | Luo, Dian Deng, Jing Becker, Edmund R. |
author_sort | Luo, Dian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) is a voluntary social health insurance program launched in 2002 for rural Chinese residents where 80% of people were without health insurance of any kind. Over time, several concerns about this program have been raised related to healthcare utilization disparities for NCMS participants in urban versus rural regions. Our study uses 2015 national survey data to evaluate the extent of these urban and rural disparities among NCMS beneficiaries. METHODS: Data for our study are based on the Chinese Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) for 2015. Our 12,190-patient sample are urban and rural patients insured by NCMS. We use logistic regression analyses to compare the extent of disparities for urban and rural residence of NCMS beneficiaries in (1) whether individuals received any inpatient or outpatient care during 2015 and (2) for those individuals that did receive care, the extent of the variation in the number of inpatient and outpatient visits among each group. RESULTS: Our regression results reveal that for urban and rural NCMS patients in 2015, there were no significant differences in inpatient or outpatient utilization for either of the dependent variables – 1) whether or not the patient had a visit during the last year, or 2) for those that had a visit, the number of visits they had. Patient characteristics: age, sex, employment, health status, chronic conditions, and per capita annual expenditures – all had significant impacts on whether or not there was an inpatient or outpatient visit but less influence on the number of inpatient or outpatient visits. CONCLUSIONS: For both access to inpatient and outpatient facilities and the level of utilization of these facilities, our results reveal that both urban and rural NCMS patients have similar levels of resource utilization. These results from 2015 indicate that utilization angst about urban and rural disparities in NCMS patients do not appear to be a significant concern. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8348873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83488732021-08-09 Urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization among beneficiaries in China’s new cooperative medical scheme Luo, Dian Deng, Jing Becker, Edmund R. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) is a voluntary social health insurance program launched in 2002 for rural Chinese residents where 80% of people were without health insurance of any kind. Over time, several concerns about this program have been raised related to healthcare utilization disparities for NCMS participants in urban versus rural regions. Our study uses 2015 national survey data to evaluate the extent of these urban and rural disparities among NCMS beneficiaries. METHODS: Data for our study are based on the Chinese Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) for 2015. Our 12,190-patient sample are urban and rural patients insured by NCMS. We use logistic regression analyses to compare the extent of disparities for urban and rural residence of NCMS beneficiaries in (1) whether individuals received any inpatient or outpatient care during 2015 and (2) for those individuals that did receive care, the extent of the variation in the number of inpatient and outpatient visits among each group. RESULTS: Our regression results reveal that for urban and rural NCMS patients in 2015, there were no significant differences in inpatient or outpatient utilization for either of the dependent variables – 1) whether or not the patient had a visit during the last year, or 2) for those that had a visit, the number of visits they had. Patient characteristics: age, sex, employment, health status, chronic conditions, and per capita annual expenditures – all had significant impacts on whether or not there was an inpatient or outpatient visit but less influence on the number of inpatient or outpatient visits. CONCLUSIONS: For both access to inpatient and outpatient facilities and the level of utilization of these facilities, our results reveal that both urban and rural NCMS patients have similar levels of resource utilization. These results from 2015 indicate that utilization angst about urban and rural disparities in NCMS patients do not appear to be a significant concern. BioMed Central 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8348873/ /pubmed/34362340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11573-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Luo, Dian Deng, Jing Becker, Edmund R. Urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization among beneficiaries in China’s new cooperative medical scheme |
title | Urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization among beneficiaries in China’s new cooperative medical scheme |
title_full | Urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization among beneficiaries in China’s new cooperative medical scheme |
title_fullStr | Urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization among beneficiaries in China’s new cooperative medical scheme |
title_full_unstemmed | Urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization among beneficiaries in China’s new cooperative medical scheme |
title_short | Urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization among beneficiaries in China’s new cooperative medical scheme |
title_sort | urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization among beneficiaries in china’s new cooperative medical scheme |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8348873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11573-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luodian urbanruraldifferencesinhealthcareutilizationamongbeneficiariesinchinasnewcooperativemedicalscheme AT dengjing urbanruraldifferencesinhealthcareutilizationamongbeneficiariesinchinasnewcooperativemedicalscheme AT beckeredmundr urbanruraldifferencesinhealthcareutilizationamongbeneficiariesinchinasnewcooperativemedicalscheme |