Cargando…

Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review

BACKGROUND: N95 respiratory protection masks are used by healthcare professionals to prevent contamination from infectious microorganisms transmitted by droplets or aerosols. METHODS: We conducted a rapid review of the literature analyzing the effectiveness of decontamination methods for mask reuse....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Probst, Livia Fernandes, Guerrero, Ana Tereza Gomes, Cardoso, Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz, Grande, Antonio Jose, Croda, Mariana Garcia, Venturini, James, Fonseca, Maria Cristina de Camargo, Paniago, Anamaria Mello Miranda, Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia, de Oliveira, Sandra Maria do Vale Leone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8349237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01742-1
_version_ 1783735525004279808
author Probst, Livia Fernandes
Guerrero, Ana Tereza Gomes
Cardoso, Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz
Grande, Antonio Jose
Croda, Mariana Garcia
Venturini, James
Fonseca, Maria Cristina de Camargo
Paniago, Anamaria Mello Miranda
Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia
de Oliveira, Sandra Maria do Vale Leone
author_facet Probst, Livia Fernandes
Guerrero, Ana Tereza Gomes
Cardoso, Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz
Grande, Antonio Jose
Croda, Mariana Garcia
Venturini, James
Fonseca, Maria Cristina de Camargo
Paniago, Anamaria Mello Miranda
Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia
de Oliveira, Sandra Maria do Vale Leone
author_sort Probst, Livia Fernandes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: N95 respiratory protection masks are used by healthcare professionals to prevent contamination from infectious microorganisms transmitted by droplets or aerosols. METHODS: We conducted a rapid review of the literature analyzing the effectiveness of decontamination methods for mask reuse. The database searches were carried out up to September 2020. The systematic review was conducted in a way which simplified the stages of a complete systematic review, due to the worldwide necessity for reliable fast evidences on this matter. RESULTS: A total of 563 articles were retrieved of which 48 laboratory-based studies were selected. Fifteen decontamination methods were included in the studies. A total of 19 laboratory studies used hydrogen peroxide, 21 studies used ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, 4 studies used ethylene oxide, 11 studies used dry heat, 9 studies used moist heat, 5 studies used ethanol, two studies used isopropanol solution, 11 studies used microwave oven, 10 studies used sodium hypochlorite, 7 studies used autoclave, 3 studies used an electric rice cooker, 1 study used cleaning wipes, 1 study used bar soap, 1 study used water, 1 study used multi-purpose high-level disinfection cabinet, and another 1 study used chlorine dioxide. Five methods that are promising are as follows: hydrogen peroxide vapor, ultraviolet irradiation, dry heat, wet heat/pasteurization, and microwave ovens. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented the best available evidence on mask decontamination; nevertheless, its applicability is limited due to few studies on the topic and the lack of studies on real environments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01742-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8349237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83492372021-08-09 Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review Probst, Livia Fernandes Guerrero, Ana Tereza Gomes Cardoso, Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz Grande, Antonio Jose Croda, Mariana Garcia Venturini, James Fonseca, Maria Cristina de Camargo Paniago, Anamaria Mello Miranda Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia de Oliveira, Sandra Maria do Vale Leone Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: N95 respiratory protection masks are used by healthcare professionals to prevent contamination from infectious microorganisms transmitted by droplets or aerosols. METHODS: We conducted a rapid review of the literature analyzing the effectiveness of decontamination methods for mask reuse. The database searches were carried out up to September 2020. The systematic review was conducted in a way which simplified the stages of a complete systematic review, due to the worldwide necessity for reliable fast evidences on this matter. RESULTS: A total of 563 articles were retrieved of which 48 laboratory-based studies were selected. Fifteen decontamination methods were included in the studies. A total of 19 laboratory studies used hydrogen peroxide, 21 studies used ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, 4 studies used ethylene oxide, 11 studies used dry heat, 9 studies used moist heat, 5 studies used ethanol, two studies used isopropanol solution, 11 studies used microwave oven, 10 studies used sodium hypochlorite, 7 studies used autoclave, 3 studies used an electric rice cooker, 1 study used cleaning wipes, 1 study used bar soap, 1 study used water, 1 study used multi-purpose high-level disinfection cabinet, and another 1 study used chlorine dioxide. Five methods that are promising are as follows: hydrogen peroxide vapor, ultraviolet irradiation, dry heat, wet heat/pasteurization, and microwave ovens. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented the best available evidence on mask decontamination; nevertheless, its applicability is limited due to few studies on the topic and the lack of studies on real environments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01742-1. BioMed Central 2021-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8349237/ /pubmed/34364396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01742-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Probst, Livia Fernandes
Guerrero, Ana Tereza Gomes
Cardoso, Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz
Grande, Antonio Jose
Croda, Mariana Garcia
Venturini, James
Fonseca, Maria Cristina de Camargo
Paniago, Anamaria Mello Miranda
Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia
de Oliveira, Sandra Maria do Vale Leone
Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review
title Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review
title_full Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review
title_fullStr Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review
title_full_unstemmed Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review
title_short Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review
title_sort mask decontamination methods (model n95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8349237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34364396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01742-1
work_keys_str_mv AT probstliviafernandes maskdecontaminationmethodsmodeln95forrespiratoryprotectionarapidreview
AT guerreroanaterezagomes maskdecontaminationmethodsmodeln95forrespiratoryprotectionarapidreview
AT cardosoandreiainsabraldedequeiroz maskdecontaminationmethodsmodeln95forrespiratoryprotectionarapidreview
AT grandeantoniojose maskdecontaminationmethodsmodeln95forrespiratoryprotectionarapidreview
AT crodamarianagarcia maskdecontaminationmethodsmodeln95forrespiratoryprotectionarapidreview
AT venturinijames maskdecontaminationmethodsmodeln95forrespiratoryprotectionarapidreview
AT fonsecamariacristinadecamargo maskdecontaminationmethodsmodeln95forrespiratoryprotectionarapidreview
AT paniagoanamariamellomiranda maskdecontaminationmethodsmodeln95forrespiratoryprotectionarapidreview
AT barretojorgeotaviomaia maskdecontaminationmethodsmodeln95forrespiratoryprotectionarapidreview
AT deoliveirasandramariadovaleleone maskdecontaminationmethodsmodeln95forrespiratoryprotectionarapidreview