Cargando…
Development and Psychometric Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Arm Lymphedema: The LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module
BACKGROUND: A multiphased mixed-methods study was performed to develop and validate a comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for arm lymphedema in women with breast cancer (i.e., the LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module). METHODS: Qualitative interviews (January 2017 and June 2018) were per...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8349351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34224044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09887-y |
_version_ | 1783735550859018240 |
---|---|
author | Klassen, Anne F. Tsangaris, Elena Kaur, Manraj N. Poulsen, Lotte Beelen, Louise M. Jacobsen, Amalie Lind Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf Sørensen, Jens Ahm Vasilic, Dalibor Dayan, Joseph Mehrara, Babak Pusic, Andrea L. |
author_facet | Klassen, Anne F. Tsangaris, Elena Kaur, Manraj N. Poulsen, Lotte Beelen, Louise M. Jacobsen, Amalie Lind Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf Sørensen, Jens Ahm Vasilic, Dalibor Dayan, Joseph Mehrara, Babak Pusic, Andrea L. |
author_sort | Klassen, Anne F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A multiphased mixed-methods study was performed to develop and validate a comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for arm lymphedema in women with breast cancer (i.e., the LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module). METHODS: Qualitative interviews (January 2017 and June 2018) were performed with 15 women to elicit concepts specific to arm lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded. Scales were refined through cognitive interviews (October and Decemeber 2018) with 16 patients and input from 12 clinical experts. The scales were field-tested (October 2019 and January 2020) with an international sample of 3222 women in the United States and Denmark. Rasch measurement theory (RMT) analysis was used to examine reliability and validity. RESULTS: The qualitative phase resulted in six independently functioning scales that measure arm symptoms, function, appearance, psychological function, and satisfaction with information and with arm sleeves. In the RMT analysis, all items in each scale had ordered thresholds and nonsignificant chi-square p values. For all the scales, the reliability statistics with and without extremes for the Person Separation Index were 0.80 or higher, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.89 or higher, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were 0.92 or higher. Lower (worse) scores on the LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity scales were associated with reporting of more severe arm swelling, an arm problem caused by cancer and/or its treatment, and wearing of an arm sleeve in the past 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module can be used to measure outcomes that matter to women with upper extremity lymphedema. This new PROM was designed using a modern psychometric approach and, as such, can be used in research and in clinical care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8349351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83493512021-08-20 Development and Psychometric Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Arm Lymphedema: The LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module Klassen, Anne F. Tsangaris, Elena Kaur, Manraj N. Poulsen, Lotte Beelen, Louise M. Jacobsen, Amalie Lind Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf Sørensen, Jens Ahm Vasilic, Dalibor Dayan, Joseph Mehrara, Babak Pusic, Andrea L. Ann Surg Oncol Reconstructive Oncology BACKGROUND: A multiphased mixed-methods study was performed to develop and validate a comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for arm lymphedema in women with breast cancer (i.e., the LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module). METHODS: Qualitative interviews (January 2017 and June 2018) were performed with 15 women to elicit concepts specific to arm lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded. Scales were refined through cognitive interviews (October and Decemeber 2018) with 16 patients and input from 12 clinical experts. The scales were field-tested (October 2019 and January 2020) with an international sample of 3222 women in the United States and Denmark. Rasch measurement theory (RMT) analysis was used to examine reliability and validity. RESULTS: The qualitative phase resulted in six independently functioning scales that measure arm symptoms, function, appearance, psychological function, and satisfaction with information and with arm sleeves. In the RMT analysis, all items in each scale had ordered thresholds and nonsignificant chi-square p values. For all the scales, the reliability statistics with and without extremes for the Person Separation Index were 0.80 or higher, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.89 or higher, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were 0.92 or higher. Lower (worse) scores on the LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity scales were associated with reporting of more severe arm swelling, an arm problem caused by cancer and/or its treatment, and wearing of an arm sleeve in the past 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module can be used to measure outcomes that matter to women with upper extremity lymphedema. This new PROM was designed using a modern psychometric approach and, as such, can be used in research and in clinical care. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8349351/ /pubmed/34224044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09887-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Reconstructive Oncology Klassen, Anne F. Tsangaris, Elena Kaur, Manraj N. Poulsen, Lotte Beelen, Louise M. Jacobsen, Amalie Lind Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf Sørensen, Jens Ahm Vasilic, Dalibor Dayan, Joseph Mehrara, Babak Pusic, Andrea L. Development and Psychometric Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Arm Lymphedema: The LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module |
title | Development and Psychometric Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Arm Lymphedema: The LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module |
title_full | Development and Psychometric Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Arm Lymphedema: The LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module |
title_fullStr | Development and Psychometric Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Arm Lymphedema: The LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Psychometric Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Arm Lymphedema: The LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module |
title_short | Development and Psychometric Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Arm Lymphedema: The LYMPH-Q Upper Extremity Module |
title_sort | development and psychometric validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for arm lymphedema: the lymph-q upper extremity module |
topic | Reconstructive Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8349351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34224044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09887-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klassenannef developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule AT tsangariselena developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule AT kaurmanrajn developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule AT poulsenlotte developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule AT beelenlouisem developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule AT jacobsenamalielind developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule AT jørgensenmadsgustaf developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule AT sørensenjensahm developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule AT vasilicdalibor developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule AT dayanjoseph developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule AT mehrarababak developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule AT pusicandreal developmentandpsychometricvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureforarmlymphedemathelymphqupperextremitymodule |