Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of external vibrating devices and counterstimulation on a child's dental anxiety, apprehension, and pain perception during local anesthetic administration. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blinded interventio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8349674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395902 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.4.345 |
_version_ | 1783735612256288768 |
---|---|
author | Sahithi, Varada Saikiran, Kanamarlapudi Venkata Nunna, Mahesh Elicherla, Sainath Reddy Challa, Ramasubba Reddy Nuvvula, Sivakumar |
author_facet | Sahithi, Varada Saikiran, Kanamarlapudi Venkata Nunna, Mahesh Elicherla, Sainath Reddy Challa, Ramasubba Reddy Nuvvula, Sivakumar |
author_sort | Sahithi, Varada |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of external vibrating devices and counterstimulation on a child's dental anxiety, apprehension, and pain perception during local anesthetic administration. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blinded interventional, clinical trial. One hundred children aged 4–11 years, requiring pulp therapy or extraction under local anesthesia (LA), were recruited and allocated equally into two groups (1:1) based on the interventions used: Group BD (n = 50) received vibration using a Buzzy® device {MMJ Labs, Atlanta, GE, USA} as a behavior guidance technique; Group CS (n = 50) received counterstimulation for the same technique. Anxiety levels [Venham's Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale (VCARS), Venham Picture Test (VPT), Pulse oximeter {Gibson, Fingertip Pulse Oximeter}, Beijing, China)] were assessed before, during, and after LA administration, while pain perception [Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] was evaluated immediately after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test to assess the mean difference between the two groups and the repeated measures ANOVA for testing the mean difference in the pulse rates. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Significant differences in mean pulse rate values were observed in both groups. In contrast, the children in the BD group had higher diminution (P < 0.05), whereas the mean VCARS and VPT scores were conspicuous (P < 0.05). Based on the mean WBFPS and VAS scores, delayed pain perception after LA injection was more prominent in the BD group than in the CS group. CONCLUSION: External vibration using a Buzzy® device is comparatively better than counterstimulation in alleviating needle-associated anxiety in children requiring extraction and pulpectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8349674 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83496742021-08-12 Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial Sahithi, Varada Saikiran, Kanamarlapudi Venkata Nunna, Mahesh Elicherla, Sainath Reddy Challa, Ramasubba Reddy Nuvvula, Sivakumar J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of external vibrating devices and counterstimulation on a child's dental anxiety, apprehension, and pain perception during local anesthetic administration. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blinded interventional, clinical trial. One hundred children aged 4–11 years, requiring pulp therapy or extraction under local anesthesia (LA), were recruited and allocated equally into two groups (1:1) based on the interventions used: Group BD (n = 50) received vibration using a Buzzy® device {MMJ Labs, Atlanta, GE, USA} as a behavior guidance technique; Group CS (n = 50) received counterstimulation for the same technique. Anxiety levels [Venham's Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale (VCARS), Venham Picture Test (VPT), Pulse oximeter {Gibson, Fingertip Pulse Oximeter}, Beijing, China)] were assessed before, during, and after LA administration, while pain perception [Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] was evaluated immediately after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test to assess the mean difference between the two groups and the repeated measures ANOVA for testing the mean difference in the pulse rates. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Significant differences in mean pulse rate values were observed in both groups. In contrast, the children in the BD group had higher diminution (P < 0.05), whereas the mean VCARS and VPT scores were conspicuous (P < 0.05). Based on the mean WBFPS and VAS scores, delayed pain perception after LA injection was more prominent in the BD group than in the CS group. CONCLUSION: External vibration using a Buzzy® device is comparatively better than counterstimulation in alleviating needle-associated anxiety in children requiring extraction and pulpectomy. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2021-08 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8349674/ /pubmed/34395902 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.4.345 Text en Copyright © 2021 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sahithi, Varada Saikiran, Kanamarlapudi Venkata Nunna, Mahesh Elicherla, Sainath Reddy Challa, Ramasubba Reddy Nuvvula, Sivakumar Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial |
title | Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8349674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395902 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.4.345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahithivarada comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial AT saikirankanamarlapudivenkata comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial AT nunnamahesh comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial AT elicherlasainathreddy comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial AT challaramasubbareddy comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial AT nuvvulasivakumar comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial |