Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of external vibrating devices and counterstimulation on a child's dental anxiety, apprehension, and pain perception during local anesthetic administration. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blinded interventio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahithi, Varada, Saikiran, Kanamarlapudi Venkata, Nunna, Mahesh, Elicherla, Sainath Reddy, Challa, Ramasubba Reddy, Nuvvula, Sivakumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8349674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395902
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.4.345
_version_ 1783735612256288768
author Sahithi, Varada
Saikiran, Kanamarlapudi Venkata
Nunna, Mahesh
Elicherla, Sainath Reddy
Challa, Ramasubba Reddy
Nuvvula, Sivakumar
author_facet Sahithi, Varada
Saikiran, Kanamarlapudi Venkata
Nunna, Mahesh
Elicherla, Sainath Reddy
Challa, Ramasubba Reddy
Nuvvula, Sivakumar
author_sort Sahithi, Varada
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of external vibrating devices and counterstimulation on a child's dental anxiety, apprehension, and pain perception during local anesthetic administration. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blinded interventional, clinical trial. One hundred children aged 4–11 years, requiring pulp therapy or extraction under local anesthesia (LA), were recruited and allocated equally into two groups (1:1) based on the interventions used: Group BD (n = 50) received vibration using a Buzzy® device {MMJ Labs, Atlanta, GE, USA} as a behavior guidance technique; Group CS (n = 50) received counterstimulation for the same technique. Anxiety levels [Venham's Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale (VCARS), Venham Picture Test (VPT), Pulse oximeter {Gibson, Fingertip Pulse Oximeter}, Beijing, China)] were assessed before, during, and after LA administration, while pain perception [Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] was evaluated immediately after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test to assess the mean difference between the two groups and the repeated measures ANOVA for testing the mean difference in the pulse rates. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Significant differences in mean pulse rate values were observed in both groups. In contrast, the children in the BD group had higher diminution (P < 0.05), whereas the mean VCARS and VPT scores were conspicuous (P < 0.05). Based on the mean WBFPS and VAS scores, delayed pain perception after LA injection was more prominent in the BD group than in the CS group. CONCLUSION: External vibration using a Buzzy® device is comparatively better than counterstimulation in alleviating needle-associated anxiety in children requiring extraction and pulpectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8349674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83496742021-08-12 Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial Sahithi, Varada Saikiran, Kanamarlapudi Venkata Nunna, Mahesh Elicherla, Sainath Reddy Challa, Ramasubba Reddy Nuvvula, Sivakumar J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of external vibrating devices and counterstimulation on a child's dental anxiety, apprehension, and pain perception during local anesthetic administration. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blinded interventional, clinical trial. One hundred children aged 4–11 years, requiring pulp therapy or extraction under local anesthesia (LA), were recruited and allocated equally into two groups (1:1) based on the interventions used: Group BD (n = 50) received vibration using a Buzzy® device {MMJ Labs, Atlanta, GE, USA} as a behavior guidance technique; Group CS (n = 50) received counterstimulation for the same technique. Anxiety levels [Venham's Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale (VCARS), Venham Picture Test (VPT), Pulse oximeter {Gibson, Fingertip Pulse Oximeter}, Beijing, China)] were assessed before, during, and after LA administration, while pain perception [Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] was evaluated immediately after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test to assess the mean difference between the two groups and the repeated measures ANOVA for testing the mean difference in the pulse rates. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Significant differences in mean pulse rate values were observed in both groups. In contrast, the children in the BD group had higher diminution (P < 0.05), whereas the mean VCARS and VPT scores were conspicuous (P < 0.05). Based on the mean WBFPS and VAS scores, delayed pain perception after LA injection was more prominent in the BD group than in the CS group. CONCLUSION: External vibration using a Buzzy® device is comparatively better than counterstimulation in alleviating needle-associated anxiety in children requiring extraction and pulpectomy. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2021-08 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8349674/ /pubmed/34395902 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.4.345 Text en Copyright © 2021 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sahithi, Varada
Saikiran, Kanamarlapudi Venkata
Nunna, Mahesh
Elicherla, Sainath Reddy
Challa, Ramasubba Reddy
Nuvvula, Sivakumar
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial
title Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial
title_full Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial
title_short Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial
title_sort comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8349674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395902
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.4.345
work_keys_str_mv AT sahithivarada comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial
AT saikirankanamarlapudivenkata comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial
AT nunnamahesh comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial
AT elicherlasainathreddy comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial
AT challaramasubbareddy comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial
AT nuvvulasivakumar comparativeevaluationofefficacyofexternalvibratingdeviceandcounterstimulationonchildsdentalanxietyandpainperceptionduringlocalanestheticadministrationaclinicaltrial