Cargando…

Detection and diagnosis of large airway collapse: a systematic review

Large airway collapse (LAC) is a frequently encountered clinical problem, caused by tracheobronchomalacia +/− excessive dynamic airway collapse, yet there are currently no universally accepted diagnostic criteria. We systematically reviewed studies reporting a diagnostic approach to LAC in healthy a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitropoulos, Alexandros, Song, Woo-Jung, Almaghlouth, Fatma, Kemp, Samuel, Polkey, Michael, Hull, James H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00055-2021
_version_ 1783735687110983680
author Mitropoulos, Alexandros
Song, Woo-Jung
Almaghlouth, Fatma
Kemp, Samuel
Polkey, Michael
Hull, James H.
author_facet Mitropoulos, Alexandros
Song, Woo-Jung
Almaghlouth, Fatma
Kemp, Samuel
Polkey, Michael
Hull, James H.
author_sort Mitropoulos, Alexandros
collection PubMed
description Large airway collapse (LAC) is a frequently encountered clinical problem, caused by tracheobronchomalacia +/− excessive dynamic airway collapse, yet there are currently no universally accepted diagnostic criteria. We systematically reviewed studies reporting a diagnostic approach to LAC in healthy adults and patients, to compare diagnostic modalities and criteria used. Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies between 1989 and 2019. Studies that reported a diagnostic approach using computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging or flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy were included. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate the prevalence of LAC in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic obstructive airway diseases. We included 41 studies, describing 10 071 subjects (47% female) with a mean±sd age of 59±9 years. Most studies (n=35) reported CT findings, and only three studies reported bronchoscopic findings. The most reported diagnostic criterion was a ≥50% reduction in tracheal or main bronchi calibre at end-expiration on dynamic expiratory CT. Meta-analyses of relevant studies found that 17% (95% CI: 0–61%) of healthy subjects and 27% (95% CI: 11–46%) of patients with chronic airways disease were classified as having LAC, using this threshold. The most reported approach to diagnose LAC utilises CT diagnostics, and at a threshold used by most clinicians (i.e., ≥50%) may classify a considerable proportion of healthy individuals as being abnormal and having LAC in a quarter of patients with chronic airways disease. Future work should focus on establishing more precise diagnostic criteria for LAC, relating this to relevant physiological and disease sequelae.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8350125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83501252021-08-10 Detection and diagnosis of large airway collapse: a systematic review Mitropoulos, Alexandros Song, Woo-Jung Almaghlouth, Fatma Kemp, Samuel Polkey, Michael Hull, James H. ERJ Open Res Reviews Large airway collapse (LAC) is a frequently encountered clinical problem, caused by tracheobronchomalacia +/− excessive dynamic airway collapse, yet there are currently no universally accepted diagnostic criteria. We systematically reviewed studies reporting a diagnostic approach to LAC in healthy adults and patients, to compare diagnostic modalities and criteria used. Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies between 1989 and 2019. Studies that reported a diagnostic approach using computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging or flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy were included. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate the prevalence of LAC in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic obstructive airway diseases. We included 41 studies, describing 10 071 subjects (47% female) with a mean±sd age of 59±9 years. Most studies (n=35) reported CT findings, and only three studies reported bronchoscopic findings. The most reported diagnostic criterion was a ≥50% reduction in tracheal or main bronchi calibre at end-expiration on dynamic expiratory CT. Meta-analyses of relevant studies found that 17% (95% CI: 0–61%) of healthy subjects and 27% (95% CI: 11–46%) of patients with chronic airways disease were classified as having LAC, using this threshold. The most reported approach to diagnose LAC utilises CT diagnostics, and at a threshold used by most clinicians (i.e., ≥50%) may classify a considerable proportion of healthy individuals as being abnormal and having LAC in a quarter of patients with chronic airways disease. Future work should focus on establishing more precise diagnostic criteria for LAC, relating this to relevant physiological and disease sequelae. European Respiratory Society 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8350125/ /pubmed/34381840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00055-2021 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org)
spellingShingle Reviews
Mitropoulos, Alexandros
Song, Woo-Jung
Almaghlouth, Fatma
Kemp, Samuel
Polkey, Michael
Hull, James H.
Detection and diagnosis of large airway collapse: a systematic review
title Detection and diagnosis of large airway collapse: a systematic review
title_full Detection and diagnosis of large airway collapse: a systematic review
title_fullStr Detection and diagnosis of large airway collapse: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Detection and diagnosis of large airway collapse: a systematic review
title_short Detection and diagnosis of large airway collapse: a systematic review
title_sort detection and diagnosis of large airway collapse: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00055-2021
work_keys_str_mv AT mitropoulosalexandros detectionanddiagnosisoflargeairwaycollapseasystematicreview
AT songwoojung detectionanddiagnosisoflargeairwaycollapseasystematicreview
AT almaghlouthfatma detectionanddiagnosisoflargeairwaycollapseasystematicreview
AT kempsamuel detectionanddiagnosisoflargeairwaycollapseasystematicreview
AT polkeymichael detectionanddiagnosisoflargeairwaycollapseasystematicreview
AT hulljamesh detectionanddiagnosisoflargeairwaycollapseasystematicreview