Cargando…
The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to estimate whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion biopsy (FUS-TB) increases the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) compared with TRUS-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-GB). METHODS: Thi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430401 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-250 |
_version_ | 1783735712267370496 |
---|---|
author | Uno, Hiromi Taniguchi, Tomoki Seike, Kensaku Kato, Daiki Takai, Manabu Iinuma, Koji Horie, Kengo Nakane, Keita Koie, Takuya |
author_facet | Uno, Hiromi Taniguchi, Tomoki Seike, Kensaku Kato, Daiki Takai, Manabu Iinuma, Koji Horie, Kengo Nakane, Keita Koie, Takuya |
author_sort | Uno, Hiromi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to estimate whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion biopsy (FUS-TB) increases the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) compared with TRUS-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-GB). METHODS: This retrospective study focused on patients who underwent mpMRI before prostate biopsy (PB) with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) scores ≥3 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level between 2.5 and 20 ng/mL. Before FUS-TB, the biopsy needle position was checked virtually using three-dimensional mapping. After confirming the position of the target within the prostate, biopsy needle was inserted and PB was performed. Suspicious lesions were generally targeted with 2 to 4 cores. Subsequently, 10–12 cores were biopsied for TRUS-GB. The primary endpoint was the PCa detection rate (PCDR) for patients with PCa who underwent combined FUS-TB and TRUS-GB. RESULTS: According to PI-RADS v2, 76.7% of the patients with PI-RADS v2 score ≥3 were diagnosed with PCa. The PCDRs in patients with PI-RADS v2 score of 4 or 5 were significantly higher than those in patients with PI-RADS v2 score of 3 (3 vs. 4, P<0.001; 3 vs. 5, P<0.001; 4 vs. 5, P=0.073). According to PCDR, the detection rates of PCa and csPCa in the FUS-TB were significantly higher than that in the TRUS-GB. CONCLUSIONS: Following detection of suspicious tumor lesions on mpMRI, FUS-TB use detects a higher number of PCa cases compared with TRUS-GB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8350232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83502322021-08-23 The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy Uno, Hiromi Taniguchi, Tomoki Seike, Kensaku Kato, Daiki Takai, Manabu Iinuma, Koji Horie, Kengo Nakane, Keita Koie, Takuya Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to estimate whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion biopsy (FUS-TB) increases the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) compared with TRUS-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-GB). METHODS: This retrospective study focused on patients who underwent mpMRI before prostate biopsy (PB) with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) scores ≥3 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level between 2.5 and 20 ng/mL. Before FUS-TB, the biopsy needle position was checked virtually using three-dimensional mapping. After confirming the position of the target within the prostate, biopsy needle was inserted and PB was performed. Suspicious lesions were generally targeted with 2 to 4 cores. Subsequently, 10–12 cores were biopsied for TRUS-GB. The primary endpoint was the PCa detection rate (PCDR) for patients with PCa who underwent combined FUS-TB and TRUS-GB. RESULTS: According to PI-RADS v2, 76.7% of the patients with PI-RADS v2 score ≥3 were diagnosed with PCa. The PCDRs in patients with PI-RADS v2 score of 4 or 5 were significantly higher than those in patients with PI-RADS v2 score of 3 (3 vs. 4, P<0.001; 3 vs. 5, P<0.001; 4 vs. 5, P=0.073). According to PCDR, the detection rates of PCa and csPCa in the FUS-TB were significantly higher than that in the TRUS-GB. CONCLUSIONS: Following detection of suspicious tumor lesions on mpMRI, FUS-TB use detects a higher number of PCa cases compared with TRUS-GB. AME Publishing Company 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8350232/ /pubmed/34430401 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-250 Text en 2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Uno, Hiromi Taniguchi, Tomoki Seike, Kensaku Kato, Daiki Takai, Manabu Iinuma, Koji Horie, Kengo Nakane, Keita Koie, Takuya The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy |
title | The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy |
title_full | The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy |
title_fullStr | The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy |
title_full_unstemmed | The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy |
title_short | The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy |
title_sort | accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430401 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT unohiromi theaccuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT taniguchitomoki theaccuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT seikekensaku theaccuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT katodaiki theaccuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT takaimanabu theaccuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT iinumakoji theaccuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT horiekengo theaccuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT nakanekeita theaccuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT koietakuya theaccuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT unohiromi accuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT taniguchitomoki accuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT seikekensaku accuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT katodaiki accuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT takaimanabu accuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT iinumakoji accuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT horiekengo accuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT nakanekeita accuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy AT koietakuya accuracyofprostatecancerdiagnosisinbiopsynaivepatientsusingcombinedmagneticresonanceimagingandtransrectalultrasoundfusiontargetedprostatebiopsy |