Cargando…

Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Although proteomics has been employed in the study of several models of liver injury, proteomic methods have only recently been applied not only to biomarker discovery and validation but also to improve understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in transplantation. METHODS: The s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López-López, Victor, Pérez-Sánz, Fernando, de Torre-Minguela, Carlos, Marco-Abenza, Josefa, Robles-Campos, Ricardo, Sánchez-Bueno, Francisco, Pons, José A., Ramírez, Pablo, Baroja-Mazo, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.672829
_version_ 1783735738700922880
author López-López, Victor
Pérez-Sánz, Fernando
de Torre-Minguela, Carlos
Marco-Abenza, Josefa
Robles-Campos, Ricardo
Sánchez-Bueno, Francisco
Pons, José A.
Ramírez, Pablo
Baroja-Mazo, Alberto
author_facet López-López, Victor
Pérez-Sánz, Fernando
de Torre-Minguela, Carlos
Marco-Abenza, Josefa
Robles-Campos, Ricardo
Sánchez-Bueno, Francisco
Pons, José A.
Ramírez, Pablo
Baroja-Mazo, Alberto
author_sort López-López, Victor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although proteomics has been employed in the study of several models of liver injury, proteomic methods have only recently been applied not only to biomarker discovery and validation but also to improve understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in transplantation. METHODS: The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology and the guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in bioinformatics (BiSLR). The PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched for publications through April 2020. Proteomics studies designed to understand liver transplant outcomes, including ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), rejection, or operational tolerance in human or rat samples that applied methodologies for differential expression analysis were considered. RESULTS: The analysis included 22 studies after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among the 497 proteins annotated, 68 were shared between species and 10 were shared between sample sources. Among the types of studies analyzed, IRI and rejection shared a higher number of proteins. The most enriched pathway for liver biopsy samples, IRI, and rejection was metabolism, compared to cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions for tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Proteomics is a promising technique to detect large numbers of proteins. However, our study shows that several technical issues such as the identification of proteoforms or the dynamic range of protein concentration in clinical samples hinder the successful identification of biomarkers in liver transplantation. In addition, there is a need to minimize the experimental variability between studies, increase the sample size and remove high-abundance plasma proteins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8350337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83503372021-08-10 Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review López-López, Victor Pérez-Sánz, Fernando de Torre-Minguela, Carlos Marco-Abenza, Josefa Robles-Campos, Ricardo Sánchez-Bueno, Francisco Pons, José A. Ramírez, Pablo Baroja-Mazo, Alberto Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Although proteomics has been employed in the study of several models of liver injury, proteomic methods have only recently been applied not only to biomarker discovery and validation but also to improve understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in transplantation. METHODS: The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology and the guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in bioinformatics (BiSLR). The PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched for publications through April 2020. Proteomics studies designed to understand liver transplant outcomes, including ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), rejection, or operational tolerance in human or rat samples that applied methodologies for differential expression analysis were considered. RESULTS: The analysis included 22 studies after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among the 497 proteins annotated, 68 were shared between species and 10 were shared between sample sources. Among the types of studies analyzed, IRI and rejection shared a higher number of proteins. The most enriched pathway for liver biopsy samples, IRI, and rejection was metabolism, compared to cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions for tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Proteomics is a promising technique to detect large numbers of proteins. However, our study shows that several technical issues such as the identification of proteoforms or the dynamic range of protein concentration in clinical samples hinder the successful identification of biomarkers in liver transplantation. In addition, there is a need to minimize the experimental variability between studies, increase the sample size and remove high-abundance plasma proteins. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8350337/ /pubmed/34381445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.672829 Text en Copyright © 2021 López-López, Pérez-Sánz, de Torre-Minguela, Marco-Abenza, Robles-Campos, Sánchez-Bueno, Pons, Ramírez and Baroja-Mazo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
López-López, Victor
Pérez-Sánz, Fernando
de Torre-Minguela, Carlos
Marco-Abenza, Josefa
Robles-Campos, Ricardo
Sánchez-Bueno, Francisco
Pons, José A.
Ramírez, Pablo
Baroja-Mazo, Alberto
Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title_full Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title_short Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review
title_sort proteomics in liver transplantation: a systematic review
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.672829
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezlopezvictor proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview
AT perezsanzfernando proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview
AT detorreminguelacarlos proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview
AT marcoabenzajosefa proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview
AT roblescamposricardo proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview
AT sanchezbuenofrancisco proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview
AT ponsjosea proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview
AT ramirezpablo proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview
AT barojamazoalberto proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview