Cargando…
Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Although proteomics has been employed in the study of several models of liver injury, proteomic methods have only recently been applied not only to biomarker discovery and validation but also to improve understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in transplantation. METHODS: The s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.672829 |
_version_ | 1783735738700922880 |
---|---|
author | López-López, Victor Pérez-Sánz, Fernando de Torre-Minguela, Carlos Marco-Abenza, Josefa Robles-Campos, Ricardo Sánchez-Bueno, Francisco Pons, José A. Ramírez, Pablo Baroja-Mazo, Alberto |
author_facet | López-López, Victor Pérez-Sánz, Fernando de Torre-Minguela, Carlos Marco-Abenza, Josefa Robles-Campos, Ricardo Sánchez-Bueno, Francisco Pons, José A. Ramírez, Pablo Baroja-Mazo, Alberto |
author_sort | López-López, Victor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although proteomics has been employed in the study of several models of liver injury, proteomic methods have only recently been applied not only to biomarker discovery and validation but also to improve understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in transplantation. METHODS: The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology and the guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in bioinformatics (BiSLR). The PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched for publications through April 2020. Proteomics studies designed to understand liver transplant outcomes, including ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), rejection, or operational tolerance in human or rat samples that applied methodologies for differential expression analysis were considered. RESULTS: The analysis included 22 studies after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among the 497 proteins annotated, 68 were shared between species and 10 were shared between sample sources. Among the types of studies analyzed, IRI and rejection shared a higher number of proteins. The most enriched pathway for liver biopsy samples, IRI, and rejection was metabolism, compared to cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions for tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Proteomics is a promising technique to detect large numbers of proteins. However, our study shows that several technical issues such as the identification of proteoforms or the dynamic range of protein concentration in clinical samples hinder the successful identification of biomarkers in liver transplantation. In addition, there is a need to minimize the experimental variability between studies, increase the sample size and remove high-abundance plasma proteins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8350337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83503372021-08-10 Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review López-López, Victor Pérez-Sánz, Fernando de Torre-Minguela, Carlos Marco-Abenza, Josefa Robles-Campos, Ricardo Sánchez-Bueno, Francisco Pons, José A. Ramírez, Pablo Baroja-Mazo, Alberto Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Although proteomics has been employed in the study of several models of liver injury, proteomic methods have only recently been applied not only to biomarker discovery and validation but also to improve understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in transplantation. METHODS: The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology and the guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in bioinformatics (BiSLR). The PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched for publications through April 2020. Proteomics studies designed to understand liver transplant outcomes, including ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), rejection, or operational tolerance in human or rat samples that applied methodologies for differential expression analysis were considered. RESULTS: The analysis included 22 studies after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among the 497 proteins annotated, 68 were shared between species and 10 were shared between sample sources. Among the types of studies analyzed, IRI and rejection shared a higher number of proteins. The most enriched pathway for liver biopsy samples, IRI, and rejection was metabolism, compared to cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions for tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Proteomics is a promising technique to detect large numbers of proteins. However, our study shows that several technical issues such as the identification of proteoforms or the dynamic range of protein concentration in clinical samples hinder the successful identification of biomarkers in liver transplantation. In addition, there is a need to minimize the experimental variability between studies, increase the sample size and remove high-abundance plasma proteins. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8350337/ /pubmed/34381445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.672829 Text en Copyright © 2021 López-López, Pérez-Sánz, de Torre-Minguela, Marco-Abenza, Robles-Campos, Sánchez-Bueno, Pons, Ramírez and Baroja-Mazo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology López-López, Victor Pérez-Sánz, Fernando de Torre-Minguela, Carlos Marco-Abenza, Josefa Robles-Campos, Ricardo Sánchez-Bueno, Francisco Pons, José A. Ramírez, Pablo Baroja-Mazo, Alberto Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review |
title | Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Proteomics in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | proteomics in liver transplantation: a systematic review |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.672829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezlopezvictor proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview AT perezsanzfernando proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview AT detorreminguelacarlos proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview AT marcoabenzajosefa proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview AT roblescamposricardo proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview AT sanchezbuenofrancisco proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview AT ponsjosea proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview AT ramirezpablo proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview AT barojamazoalberto proteomicsinlivertransplantationasystematicreview |