Cargando…
Stimulus-induced EEG-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest
OBJECTIVE: EEG is commonly used to predict prognosis in post anoxic coma. We investigated if stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) add prognostic information after cardiac arrest. METHODS: In the multicenter Targeted Temperature Management trial, routine-EEGs were prospec...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34401610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.07.001 |
_version_ | 1783735765683929088 |
---|---|
author | Broman, N.Jaffer Backman, S. Westhall, E. |
author_facet | Broman, N.Jaffer Backman, S. Westhall, E. |
author_sort | Broman, N.Jaffer |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: EEG is commonly used to predict prognosis in post anoxic coma. We investigated if stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) add prognostic information after cardiac arrest. METHODS: In the multicenter Targeted Temperature Management trial, routine-EEGs were prospectively recorded after rewarming (≥36 h). Presence and subtype of SIRPIDs and main EEG-pattern (benign, malignant, highly malignant) were retrospectively reported according to a standardised classification. Patients were followed up after 180 days. Poor outcome was defined as severe neurological disability or death (Cerebral Performance Category 3–5). RESULTS: Of 142 patients, 71% had poor outcome and 14% had SIRPIDs. There was no significant difference in outcome between patients with and without SIRPIDs, even when subgrouped according to underlying main EEG-pattern. Comparing subtypes of SIRPIDs, 82% of patients with stimulus-induced periodic discharges had poor outcome compared to 44% of patients with stimulus-induced rhythmic delta activity, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: In EEGs performed ≥36 h after cardiac arrest, SIRPIDs cannot be used to reliably predict poor outcome. Whether certain subtypes of SIRPIDs indicate worse prognosis needs further investigation. SIGNIFICANCE: Categorising the main EEG-pattern has important prognostic implications, but assessment of late appearing SIRPIDs does not seem to add prognostic information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8350459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83504592021-08-15 Stimulus-induced EEG-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest Broman, N.Jaffer Backman, S. Westhall, E. Clin Neurophysiol Pract Research Paper OBJECTIVE: EEG is commonly used to predict prognosis in post anoxic coma. We investigated if stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs) add prognostic information after cardiac arrest. METHODS: In the multicenter Targeted Temperature Management trial, routine-EEGs were prospectively recorded after rewarming (≥36 h). Presence and subtype of SIRPIDs and main EEG-pattern (benign, malignant, highly malignant) were retrospectively reported according to a standardised classification. Patients were followed up after 180 days. Poor outcome was defined as severe neurological disability or death (Cerebral Performance Category 3–5). RESULTS: Of 142 patients, 71% had poor outcome and 14% had SIRPIDs. There was no significant difference in outcome between patients with and without SIRPIDs, even when subgrouped according to underlying main EEG-pattern. Comparing subtypes of SIRPIDs, 82% of patients with stimulus-induced periodic discharges had poor outcome compared to 44% of patients with stimulus-induced rhythmic delta activity, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: In EEGs performed ≥36 h after cardiac arrest, SIRPIDs cannot be used to reliably predict poor outcome. Whether certain subtypes of SIRPIDs indicate worse prognosis needs further investigation. SIGNIFICANCE: Categorising the main EEG-pattern has important prognostic implications, but assessment of late appearing SIRPIDs does not seem to add prognostic information. Elsevier 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8350459/ /pubmed/34401610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.07.001 Text en © 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Broman, N.Jaffer Backman, S. Westhall, E. Stimulus-induced EEG-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest |
title | Stimulus-induced EEG-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest |
title_full | Stimulus-induced EEG-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest |
title_fullStr | Stimulus-induced EEG-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest |
title_full_unstemmed | Stimulus-induced EEG-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest |
title_short | Stimulus-induced EEG-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest |
title_sort | stimulus-induced eeg-patterns and outcome after cardiac arrest |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34401610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.07.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bromannjaffer stimulusinducedeegpatternsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest AT backmans stimulusinducedeegpatternsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest AT westhalle stimulusinducedeegpatternsandoutcomeaftercardiacarrest |