Cargando…
Three-dimensional facial scanner in the hands of patients: validation of a novel application on iPad/iPhone for three-dimensional imaging
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) photography plays an important role in surgical planning and postoperative evaluation. Commercial 3D facial scanners are expensive, and they require patients to come to the clinics for 3D photography. To solve this problem, we developed an iPad/iPhone application t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430556 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-1620 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) photography plays an important role in surgical planning and postoperative evaluation. Commercial 3D facial scanners are expensive, and they require patients to come to the clinics for 3D photography. To solve this problem, we developed an iPad/iPhone application to enable patients to capture 3D images of themselves on their own. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of this novel imaging system. METHODS: 3D images were taken on 20 volunteers using the novel imaging system. Twenty-one anthropometric parameters were measured using calipers (direct measurement) and 3D photographs (3D photogrammetry). The results were compared to assess the accuracy and bias of 3D photogrammetry. The reproducibility was evaluated by testing intra- and interobserver reliabilities. Furthermore, 3D virtual models obtained by the novel imaging system and Vectra H1 camera were compared by performing heat map analysis. RESULTS: The 3D photogrammetric results showed excellent correlations with direct measurements. Most anthropometric parameters did not show statistically significant differences between the two methods. The 95% limits of agreement exceeded 2 mm in some parameters, especially those with large numbers, although their relative error measurements were very small. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were high enough to ensure good reproducibility. The comparison of 3D models obtained by the novel imaging system and Vectra H1 camera showed that the mean distance and the mean RMS were 0.08 and 0.67 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The novel 3D facial scanning system is validated to enable patients to take 3D images on their own. The imaging quality of the subnasale region needs further improvement. Future clinical applications include surgical planning, postoperative evaluation, and early diagnosis of diseases that affect facial appearance. |
---|