Cargando…
Clinical importance of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting—a systematic review
Dual antiplatelet therapy is frequently prescribed for patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS), however clopidogrel resistance might cause thromboembolic complications. The role of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing CAS is unclear. In this study, we aimed to review t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430652 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7153 |
_version_ | 1783735825972854784 |
---|---|
author | Collette, Sabine L. Bokkers, Reinoud P. H. Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O. van der Laan, Maarten J. Zeebregts, Clark J. Uyttenboogaart, Maarten |
author_facet | Collette, Sabine L. Bokkers, Reinoud P. H. Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O. van der Laan, Maarten J. Zeebregts, Clark J. Uyttenboogaart, Maarten |
author_sort | Collette, Sabine L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dual antiplatelet therapy is frequently prescribed for patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS), however clopidogrel resistance might cause thromboembolic complications. The role of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing CAS is unclear. In this study, we aimed to review the periprocedural thromboembolic outcomes in clopidogrel resistant patients who underwent CAS. We conducted a review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to October 7, 2020. Studies were included that investigated at least ten patients aged 18 years or older with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis requiring CAS. Studies were excluded that investigated patients with a carotid artery dissection, case reports, case series of less than ten patients, reviews, commentaries, letters to the editors, and conference abstracts. The primary endpoint was the incidence of thromboembolic events. One hundred seventy-seven unique articles were identified of which three studies were included in our systematic review. The sample sizes ranged from 76 to 449 patients and the follow-up duration from 24 hours to 2 years postprocedural. Two retrospective observational studies determined clopidogrel resistance using measurement of P2Y12 reaction units, and one historical cohort study used genetic testing. Two studies concluded that clopidogrel resistance was a risk factor for thromboembolic complications, the other found higher values of P2Y12 reaction units in patients with thromboembolic events compared to those without. In conclusion, current literature supports a possible relationship between clopidogrel resistance and thromboembolic complications in patients who underwent CAS. Preprocedural testing for clopidogrel resistance might therefore be of additional value. Randomized studies using a valid, reliable clopidogrel resistance test and clinical endpoints, are however required to make a definitive statement and to determine the impact of the thromboembolic complications. This study was registered within PROSPERO (CRD42020197318). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8350701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83507012021-08-23 Clinical importance of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting—a systematic review Collette, Sabine L. Bokkers, Reinoud P. H. Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O. van der Laan, Maarten J. Zeebregts, Clark J. Uyttenboogaart, Maarten Ann Transl Med Review Article on Carotid Artery Stenosis and Stroke-Prevention and Treatment Part II Dual antiplatelet therapy is frequently prescribed for patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS), however clopidogrel resistance might cause thromboembolic complications. The role of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing CAS is unclear. In this study, we aimed to review the periprocedural thromboembolic outcomes in clopidogrel resistant patients who underwent CAS. We conducted a review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to October 7, 2020. Studies were included that investigated at least ten patients aged 18 years or older with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis requiring CAS. Studies were excluded that investigated patients with a carotid artery dissection, case reports, case series of less than ten patients, reviews, commentaries, letters to the editors, and conference abstracts. The primary endpoint was the incidence of thromboembolic events. One hundred seventy-seven unique articles were identified of which three studies were included in our systematic review. The sample sizes ranged from 76 to 449 patients and the follow-up duration from 24 hours to 2 years postprocedural. Two retrospective observational studies determined clopidogrel resistance using measurement of P2Y12 reaction units, and one historical cohort study used genetic testing. Two studies concluded that clopidogrel resistance was a risk factor for thromboembolic complications, the other found higher values of P2Y12 reaction units in patients with thromboembolic events compared to those without. In conclusion, current literature supports a possible relationship between clopidogrel resistance and thromboembolic complications in patients who underwent CAS. Preprocedural testing for clopidogrel resistance might therefore be of additional value. Randomized studies using a valid, reliable clopidogrel resistance test and clinical endpoints, are however required to make a definitive statement and to determine the impact of the thromboembolic complications. This study was registered within PROSPERO (CRD42020197318). AME Publishing Company 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8350701/ /pubmed/34430652 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7153 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Carotid Artery Stenosis and Stroke-Prevention and Treatment Part II Collette, Sabine L. Bokkers, Reinoud P. H. Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O. van der Laan, Maarten J. Zeebregts, Clark J. Uyttenboogaart, Maarten Clinical importance of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting—a systematic review |
title | Clinical importance of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting—a systematic review |
title_full | Clinical importance of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting—a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Clinical importance of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting—a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical importance of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting—a systematic review |
title_short | Clinical importance of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting—a systematic review |
title_sort | clinical importance of testing for clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting—a systematic review |
topic | Review Article on Carotid Artery Stenosis and Stroke-Prevention and Treatment Part II |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430652 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT collettesabinel clinicalimportanceoftestingforclopidogrelresistanceinpatientsundergoingcarotidarterystentingasystematicreview AT bokkersreinoudph clinicalimportanceoftestingforclopidogrelresistanceinpatientsundergoingcarotidarterystentingasystematicreview AT dierckxrudiajo clinicalimportanceoftestingforclopidogrelresistanceinpatientsundergoingcarotidarterystentingasystematicreview AT vanderlaanmaartenj clinicalimportanceoftestingforclopidogrelresistanceinpatientsundergoingcarotidarterystentingasystematicreview AT zeebregtsclarkj clinicalimportanceoftestingforclopidogrelresistanceinpatientsundergoingcarotidarterystentingasystematicreview AT uyttenboogaartmaarten clinicalimportanceoftestingforclopidogrelresistanceinpatientsundergoingcarotidarterystentingasystematicreview |