Cargando…

Comparison of electrophysiological and motility assays to study anthelmintic effects in Caenorhabditis elegans

Currently, only a few chemical drug classes are available to control the global burden of nematode infections in humans and animals. Most of these drugs exert their anthelmintic activity by interacting with proteins such as ion channels, and the nematode neuromuscular system remains a promising targ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hahnel, Steffen R., Roberts, William M., Heisler, Iring, Kulke, Daniel, Weeks, Janis C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34252686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2021.05.005
_version_ 1783735847343882240
author Hahnel, Steffen R.
Roberts, William M.
Heisler, Iring
Kulke, Daniel
Weeks, Janis C.
author_facet Hahnel, Steffen R.
Roberts, William M.
Heisler, Iring
Kulke, Daniel
Weeks, Janis C.
author_sort Hahnel, Steffen R.
collection PubMed
description Currently, only a few chemical drug classes are available to control the global burden of nematode infections in humans and animals. Most of these drugs exert their anthelmintic activity by interacting with proteins such as ion channels, and the nematode neuromuscular system remains a promising target for novel intervention strategies. Many commonly-used phenotypic readouts such as motility provide only indirect insight into neuromuscular function and the site(s) of action of chemical compounds. Electrophysiological recordings provide more specific information but are typically technically challenging and lack high throughput for drug discovery. Because drug discovery relies strongly on the evaluation and ranking of drug candidates, including closely related chemical derivatives, precise assays and assay combinations are needed for capturing and distinguishing subtle drug effects. Past studies show that nematode motility and pharyngeal pumping (feeding) are inhibited by most anthelmintic drugs. Here we compare two microfluidic devices (“chips”) that record electrophysiological signals from the nematode pharynx (electropharyngeograms; EPGs) ─ the ScreenChip™ and the 8-channel EPG platform ─ to evaluate their respective utility for anthelmintic research. We additionally compared EPG data with whole-worm motility measurements obtained with the wMicroTracker instrument. As references, we used three macrocyclic lactones (ivermectin, moxidectin, and milbemycin oxime), and levamisole, which act on different ion channels. Drug potencies (IC(50) and IC(95) values) from concentration-response curves, and the time-course of drug effects, were compared across platforms and across drugs. Drug effects on pump timing and EPG waveforms were also investigated. These experiments confirmed drug-class specific effects of the tested anthelmintics and illustrated the relative strengths and limitations of the different assays for anthelmintic research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8350797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83507972021-08-15 Comparison of electrophysiological and motility assays to study anthelmintic effects in Caenorhabditis elegans Hahnel, Steffen R. Roberts, William M. Heisler, Iring Kulke, Daniel Weeks, Janis C. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist Regular article Currently, only a few chemical drug classes are available to control the global burden of nematode infections in humans and animals. Most of these drugs exert their anthelmintic activity by interacting with proteins such as ion channels, and the nematode neuromuscular system remains a promising target for novel intervention strategies. Many commonly-used phenotypic readouts such as motility provide only indirect insight into neuromuscular function and the site(s) of action of chemical compounds. Electrophysiological recordings provide more specific information but are typically technically challenging and lack high throughput for drug discovery. Because drug discovery relies strongly on the evaluation and ranking of drug candidates, including closely related chemical derivatives, precise assays and assay combinations are needed for capturing and distinguishing subtle drug effects. Past studies show that nematode motility and pharyngeal pumping (feeding) are inhibited by most anthelmintic drugs. Here we compare two microfluidic devices (“chips”) that record electrophysiological signals from the nematode pharynx (electropharyngeograms; EPGs) ─ the ScreenChip™ and the 8-channel EPG platform ─ to evaluate their respective utility for anthelmintic research. We additionally compared EPG data with whole-worm motility measurements obtained with the wMicroTracker instrument. As references, we used three macrocyclic lactones (ivermectin, moxidectin, and milbemycin oxime), and levamisole, which act on different ion channels. Drug potencies (IC(50) and IC(95) values) from concentration-response curves, and the time-course of drug effects, were compared across platforms and across drugs. Drug effects on pump timing and EPG waveforms were also investigated. These experiments confirmed drug-class specific effects of the tested anthelmintics and illustrated the relative strengths and limitations of the different assays for anthelmintic research. Elsevier 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8350797/ /pubmed/34252686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2021.05.005 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular article
Hahnel, Steffen R.
Roberts, William M.
Heisler, Iring
Kulke, Daniel
Weeks, Janis C.
Comparison of electrophysiological and motility assays to study anthelmintic effects in Caenorhabditis elegans
title Comparison of electrophysiological and motility assays to study anthelmintic effects in Caenorhabditis elegans
title_full Comparison of electrophysiological and motility assays to study anthelmintic effects in Caenorhabditis elegans
title_fullStr Comparison of electrophysiological and motility assays to study anthelmintic effects in Caenorhabditis elegans
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of electrophysiological and motility assays to study anthelmintic effects in Caenorhabditis elegans
title_short Comparison of electrophysiological and motility assays to study anthelmintic effects in Caenorhabditis elegans
title_sort comparison of electrophysiological and motility assays to study anthelmintic effects in caenorhabditis elegans
topic Regular article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8350797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34252686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2021.05.005
work_keys_str_mv AT hahnelsteffenr comparisonofelectrophysiologicalandmotilityassaystostudyanthelminticeffectsincaenorhabditiselegans
AT robertswilliamm comparisonofelectrophysiologicalandmotilityassaystostudyanthelminticeffectsincaenorhabditiselegans
AT heisleriring comparisonofelectrophysiologicalandmotilityassaystostudyanthelminticeffectsincaenorhabditiselegans
AT kulkedaniel comparisonofelectrophysiologicalandmotilityassaystostudyanthelminticeffectsincaenorhabditiselegans
AT weeksjanisc comparisonofelectrophysiologicalandmotilityassaystostudyanthelminticeffectsincaenorhabditiselegans