Cargando…

Demographic, clinical, and functional determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the sociodemographic, functional, and clinical determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) attended in the internal medicine setting. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in NVAF patients who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mostaza, Jose María, Suarez, Carmen, Cepeda, Jose María, Manzano, Luis, Sánchez, Demetrio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02019-0
_version_ 1783735906927116288
author Mostaza, Jose María
Suarez, Carmen
Cepeda, Jose María
Manzano, Luis
Sánchez, Demetrio
author_facet Mostaza, Jose María
Suarez, Carmen
Cepeda, Jose María
Manzano, Luis
Sánchez, Demetrio
author_sort Mostaza, Jose María
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study assessed the sociodemographic, functional, and clinical determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) attended in the internal medicine setting. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in NVAF patients who attended internal medicine departments for either a routine visit (outpatients) or hospitalization (inpatients). RESULTS: A total of 961 patients were evaluated. Their antithrombotic management included: no treatment (4.7%), vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (59.6%), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (21.6%), antiplatelets (6.6%), and antiplatelets plus anticoagulants (7.5%). Permanent NVAF and congestive heart failure were associated with preferential use of oral anticoagulation over antiplatelets, while intermediate-to high-mortality risk according to the PROFUND index was associated with a higher likelihood of using antiplatelet therapy instead of oral anticoagulation. Longer disease duration and institutionalization were identified as determinants of VKA use over DOACs. Female gender, higher education, and having suffered a stroke determined a preferential use of DOACs. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study showed that most elderly NVAF patients received oral anticoagulation, mainly VKAs, while DOACs remained underused. Antiplatelets were still offered to a proportion of patients. Longer duration of NVAF and institutionalization were identified as determinants of VKA use over DOACs. A poor prognosis according to the PROFUND index was identified as a factor preventing the use of oral anticoagulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8351138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83511382021-08-09 Demographic, clinical, and functional determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation Mostaza, Jose María Suarez, Carmen Cepeda, Jose María Manzano, Luis Sánchez, Demetrio BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: This study assessed the sociodemographic, functional, and clinical determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) attended in the internal medicine setting. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in NVAF patients who attended internal medicine departments for either a routine visit (outpatients) or hospitalization (inpatients). RESULTS: A total of 961 patients were evaluated. Their antithrombotic management included: no treatment (4.7%), vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (59.6%), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (21.6%), antiplatelets (6.6%), and antiplatelets plus anticoagulants (7.5%). Permanent NVAF and congestive heart failure were associated with preferential use of oral anticoagulation over antiplatelets, while intermediate-to high-mortality risk according to the PROFUND index was associated with a higher likelihood of using antiplatelet therapy instead of oral anticoagulation. Longer disease duration and institutionalization were identified as determinants of VKA use over DOACs. Female gender, higher education, and having suffered a stroke determined a preferential use of DOACs. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study showed that most elderly NVAF patients received oral anticoagulation, mainly VKAs, while DOACs remained underused. Antiplatelets were still offered to a proportion of patients. Longer duration of NVAF and institutionalization were identified as determinants of VKA use over DOACs. A poor prognosis according to the PROFUND index was identified as a factor preventing the use of oral anticoagulation. BioMed Central 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8351138/ /pubmed/34372782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02019-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mostaza, Jose María
Suarez, Carmen
Cepeda, Jose María
Manzano, Luis
Sánchez, Demetrio
Demographic, clinical, and functional determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title Demographic, clinical, and functional determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_full Demographic, clinical, and functional determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Demographic, clinical, and functional determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Demographic, clinical, and functional determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_short Demographic, clinical, and functional determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_sort demographic, clinical, and functional determinants of antithrombotic treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02019-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mostazajosemaria demographicclinicalandfunctionaldeterminantsofantithrombotictreatmentinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT suarezcarmen demographicclinicalandfunctionaldeterminantsofantithrombotictreatmentinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT cepedajosemaria demographicclinicalandfunctionaldeterminantsofantithrombotictreatmentinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT manzanoluis demographicclinicalandfunctionaldeterminantsofantithrombotictreatmentinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT sanchezdemetrio demographicclinicalandfunctionaldeterminantsofantithrombotictreatmentinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT demographicclinicalandfunctionaldeterminantsofantithrombotictreatmentinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation